• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类观察学习中选择模仿与目标模拟之间的仲裁的神经计算解释。

A Neuro-computational Account of Arbitration between Choice Imitation and Goal Emulation during Human Observational Learning.

机构信息

Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.

Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.

出版信息

Neuron. 2020 May 20;106(4):687-699.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.02.028
PMID:32187528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7244377/
Abstract

When individuals learn from observing the behavior of others, they deploy at least two distinct strategies. Choice imitation involves repeating other agents' previous actions, whereas emulation proceeds from inferring their goals and intentions. Despite the prevalence of observational learning in humans and other social animals, a fundamental question remains unaddressed: how does the brain decide which strategy to use in a given situation? In two fMRI studies (the second a pre-registered replication of the first), we identify a neuro-computational mechanism underlying arbitration between choice imitation and goal emulation. Computational modeling, combined with a behavioral task that dissociated the two strategies, revealed that control over behavior was adaptively and dynamically weighted toward the most reliable strategy. Emulation reliability, the model's arbitration signal, was represented in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, and rostral cingulate cortex. Our replicated findings illuminate the computations by which the brain decides to imitate or emulate others.

摘要

当个体通过观察他人的行为进行学习时,他们至少会运用两种不同的策略。选择模仿涉及重复其他主体之前的行为,而效仿则是从推断他们的目标和意图开始。尽管观察学习在人类和其他社会性动物中非常普遍,但一个基本问题仍未得到解决:大脑如何在特定情况下决定使用哪种策略?在两项 fMRI 研究中(第二项是第一项的预先注册复制),我们确定了在选择模仿和目标效仿之间进行仲裁的神经计算机制。计算模型与能够区分两种策略的行为任务相结合,揭示了行为控制被适应性地和动态地加权到最可靠的策略。效仿可靠性,即模型的仲裁信号,在腹外侧前额叶皮层、颞顶联合区和额前扣带皮层中得到了体现。我们复制的发现阐明了大脑决定模仿或效仿他人的计算过程。

相似文献

1
A Neuro-computational Account of Arbitration between Choice Imitation and Goal Emulation during Human Observational Learning.人类观察学习中选择模仿与目标模拟之间的仲裁的神经计算解释。
Neuron. 2020 May 20;106(4):687-699.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
2
The cognitive structure of goal emulation during the preschool years.学龄前儿童目标模仿的认知结构。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2016 Mar;34(1):132-49. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12111. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
3
Social learning of goal-directed actions in dogs (Canis familiaris): Imitation or emulation?犬类(家犬)目标导向行为的社会学习:模仿还是仿效?
J Comp Psychol. 2019 May;133(2):244-251. doi: 10.1037/com0000149. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
4
The application of computational models to social neuroscience: promises and pitfalls.计算模型在社会神经科学中的应用:前景与陷阱。
Soc Neurosci. 2018 Dec;13(6):637-647. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2018.1518834. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Neural computations underlying arbitration between model-based and model-free learning.基于模型和无模型学习之间仲裁的神经计算。
Neuron. 2014 Feb 5;81(3):687-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.028.
6
A Bayesian Developmental Approach to Robotic Goal-Based Imitation Learning.一种基于贝叶斯发展方法的机器人目标导向模仿学习
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 4;10(11):e0141965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141965. eCollection 2015.
7
The ontogeny of cumulative culture: Individual toddlers vary in faithful imitation and goal emulation.累积文化的个体发生:个别幼儿在忠实模仿和目标模拟方面存在差异。
Dev Sci. 2020 Jan;23(1):e12862. doi: 10.1111/desc.12862. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
8
Differential activation of brain regions involved with error-feedback and imitation based motor simulation when observing self and an expert's actions in pilots and non-pilots on a complex glider landing task.在执行复杂滑翔机着陆任务时,观察自身和专家的动作时,飞行员和非飞行员大脑中与错误反馈和基于模仿的运动模拟相关的区域的差异激活。
Neuroimage. 2013 May 15;72:55-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.028. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
9
Arbitrating Computational Models of Observational Learning.裁判观测学习的计算模型。
Neuron. 2020 May 20;106(4):558-560. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.04.028.
10
The reliability of a model influences 14-month-olds' imitation.模型的可靠性影响 14 个月大婴儿的模仿行为。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Aug;106(4):208-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A computational cognitive neuroscience approach for characterizing individual differences in autism: Introduction to Special Issue.一种用于刻画自闭症个体差异的计算认知神经科学方法:特刊引言
Personal Neurosci. 2025 Apr 10;8:e2. doi: 10.1017/pen.2025.2. eCollection 2025.
2
Dorsomedial and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions differentially impact social influence and temporal discounting.背内侧和腹内侧前额叶皮层损伤对社会影响和时间折扣有不同影响。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Apr 28;23(4):e3003079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003079. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Individual differences in autism-like traits are associated with reduced goal emulation in a computational model of observational learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Biological mechanisms for observational learning.观察学习的生物学机制。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019 Feb;54:178-185. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
2
The application of computational models to social neuroscience: promises and pitfalls.计算模型在社会神经科学中的应用:前景与陷阱。
Soc Neurosci. 2018 Dec;13(6):637-647. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2018.1518834. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
MACS - a new SPM toolbox for model assessment, comparison and selection.MACS - 一个用于模型评估、比较和选择的新 SPM 工具箱。
在观察学习的计算模型中,类自闭症特征的个体差异与目标模仿减少有关。
Nat Ment Health. 2024 Sep;2(9):1032-1044. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00287-1. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
4
Causal involvement of dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in learning the predictability of observable actions.背内侧前额叶皮质在学习可观察动作的可预测性中的因果作用。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 27;15(1):8305. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52559-0.
5
Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward.人类在奖励存在个体差异的情况下,仍能灵活地整合社会信息。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 24;121(39):e2404928121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404928121. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
6
Group Coordination Catalyzes Individual and Cultural Intelligence.团队协作催化个人与文化智慧。
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Aug 31;8:1037-1057. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00155. eCollection 2024.
7
Transmission of social bias through observational learning.通过观察学习传递社会偏见。
Sci Adv. 2024 Jun 28;10(26):eadk2030. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk2030.
8
Humans can infer social preferences from decision speed alone.人类仅凭决策速度就能推断出社会偏好。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jun 20;22(6):e3002686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002686. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Heterogeneity in strategy use during arbitration between experiential and observational learning.在经验学习和观察学习之间的仲裁中策略使用的异质性。
Nat Commun. 2024 May 24;15(1):4436. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48548-y.
10
The influence of social feedback on reward learning in the Iowa gambling task.社会反馈对爱荷华赌博任务中奖励学习的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 2;15:1292808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1292808. eCollection 2024.
J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Aug 1;306:19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 May 26.
4
Neural computations underlying inverse reinforcement learning in the human brain.人类大脑中反向强化学习的神经计算。
Elife. 2017 Oct 30;6:e29718. doi: 10.7554/eLife.29718.
5
A causal account of the brain network computations underlying strategic social behavior.战略社会行为的大脑网络计算的因果解释。
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Aug;20(8):1142-1149. doi: 10.1038/nn.4602. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
6
The Importance of Falsification in Computational Cognitive Modeling.计算认知建模中伪造的重要性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jun;21(6):425-433. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 May 2.
7
Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research.审视前沿:迈向透明且可重复的神经影像学研究。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb;18(2):115-126. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.167. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
8
How to avoid mismodelling in GLM-based fMRI data analysis: cross-validated Bayesian model selection.如何在基于广义线性模型的功能磁共振成像数据分析中避免模型误设:交叉验证贝叶斯模型选择
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 1;141:469-489. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.047. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
9
In vivo delineation of subdivisions of the human amygdaloid complex in a high-resolution group template.在高分辨率群体模板中对人类杏仁核复合体亚区进行体内描绘。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Nov;37(11):3979-3998. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23289.
10
The Human Brainnetome Atlas: A New Brain Atlas Based on Connectional Architecture.人类脑网络组图谱:基于连接结构的新脑图谱。
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Aug;26(8):3508-26. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw157. Epub 2016 May 26.