• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用惩罚期望最大化算法推断潜在转变 CDM 中的学习轨迹。

Using Penalized EM Algorithm to Infer Learning Trajectories in Latent Transition CDM.

机构信息

Measurement and Statistics, College of Education, University of Washington, 312E Miller Hall, 2012 Skagit Ln, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

出版信息

Psychometrika. 2021 Mar;86(1):167-189. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09742-1. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11336-020-09742-1
PMID:33449306
Abstract

Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) have arisen as advanced psychometric models in the past few decades for assessments that intend to measure students' mastery of a set of attributes. Recently, quite a few studies attempted to extend CDMs to longitudinal versions, and they all tended to model transition probabilities from non-mastery to mastery or vice versa for each attribute separately, with an exception of a few studies (e.g., Chen et al. 2018; Madison & Bradshaw 2018). However, these pioneering works have not taken into consideration the attribute relationships and the ever-changing attributes in a learning period. In this paper, we consider a profile-level latent transition CDM (TCDM hereafter), which can not only identify transition probabilities across the same attributes over time, but also the transition pathways across different attributes. Two versions of the penalized expectation-maximization (PEM) algorithms are proposed to shrink the probabilities associated with impermissible transition pathways to 0 and, thereby, help explore attribute relationships in a longitudinal setting. Simulation results reveal that PEM with group penalty holds great promise for identifying learning trajectories.

摘要

认知诊断模型 (CDMs) 在过去几十年中作为先进的心理测量模型出现,旨在衡量学生对一组属性的掌握程度。最近,相当多的研究试图将 CDMs 扩展到纵向版本,它们都倾向于分别为每个属性建模从非掌握到掌握或反之的转变概率,只有少数研究例外(例如,Chen 等人,2018 年;Madison 和 Bradshaw,2018 年)。然而,这些开创性的工作没有考虑属性关系和学习期间不断变化的属性。在本文中,我们考虑了一种基于剖面的潜在转变 CDM(以下简称 TCDM),它不仅可以识别随时间在同一属性上的转变概率,还可以识别不同属性之间的转变途径。提出了两种惩罚期望最大化 (PEM) 算法版本,将与不允许的转变途径相关的概率收缩到 0,从而有助于在纵向设置中探索属性关系。模拟结果表明,具有组惩罚的 PEM 有望识别学习轨迹。

相似文献

1
Using Penalized EM Algorithm to Infer Learning Trajectories in Latent Transition CDM.使用惩罚期望最大化算法推断潜在转变 CDM 中的学习轨迹。
Psychometrika. 2021 Mar;86(1):167-189. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09742-1. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models.学习认知诊断模型中的潜在和层次结构。
Psychometrika. 2023 Mar;88(1):175-207. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09867-5. Epub 2022 May 20.
3
Measuring Skill Growth and Evaluating Change: Unconditional and Conditional Approaches to Latent Growth Cognitive Diagnostic Models.测量技能增长与评估变化:潜在增长认知诊断模型的无条件和有条件方法
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 11;11:2205. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02205. eCollection 2020.
4
A Higher-Order Cognitive Diagnosis Model with Ordinal Attributes for Dichotomous Response Data.具有二项式反应数据的阶属性的高阶认知诊断模型。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Mar-May;57(2-3):408-421. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1860731. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
First-Order Learning Models With the GDINA: Estimation With the EM Algorithm and Applications.基于GDINA的一阶学习模型:使用期望最大化算法的估计及应用
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 May;45(3):143-158. doi: 10.1177/0146621621990746. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
6
Cognitive diagnosis models for multiple strategies.多策略认知诊断模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2019 May;72(2):370-392. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12155. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
7
A Diagnostic Facet Status Model (DFSM) for Extracting Instructionally Useful Information from Diagnostic Assessment.用于从诊断评估中提取具有教学意义信息的诊断面状态模型(DFSM)。
Psychometrika. 2024 Sep;89(3):747-773. doi: 10.1007/s11336-024-09971-8. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
8
International comparative study of learning trajectories based on TIMSS 2019 G4 data on cognitive diagnostic models.基于2019年国际数学和科学趋势研究(TIMSS)四年级数据的认知诊断模型的学习轨迹国际比较研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1241656. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1241656. eCollection 2023.
9
Learning Large Q-Matrix by Restricted Boltzmann Machines.通过受限玻尔兹曼机学习大 Q 矩阵。
Psychometrika. 2022 Sep;87(3):1010-1041. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09828-4. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
10
Using Response Times and Response Accuracy to Measure Fluency Within Cognitive Diagnosis Models.利用反应时和反应准确率衡量认知诊断模型中的流畅性。
Psychometrika. 2020 Sep;85(3):600-629. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09717-2. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

本文引用的文献

1
A Hidden Markov Model for Learning Trajectories in Cognitive Diagnosis With Application to Spatial Rotation Skills.一种用于认知诊断中学习轨迹的隐马尔可夫模型及其在空间旋转技能中的应用
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Jan;42(1):5-23. doi: 10.1177/0146621617721250. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
2
Comparing Two Algorithms for Calibrating the Restricted Non-Compensatory Multidimensional IRT Model.比较两种用于校准受限非补偿多维IRT模型的算法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Mar;39(2):119-134. doi: 10.1177/0146621614545983. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
3
Assessing Change in Latent Skills Across Time With Longitudinal Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling: An Evaluation of Model Performance.
使用纵向认知诊断模型评估潜在技能随时间的变化:模型性能评估
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jun;77(3):369-388. doi: 10.1177/0013164416659314. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
4
A Latent Transition Analysis Model for Assessing Change in Cognitive Skills.一种用于评估认知技能变化的潜在转变分析模型。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Apr;76(2):181-204. doi: 10.1177/0013164415588946. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
5
A multicomponent latent trait model for diagnosis.一种用于诊断的多成分潜在特质模型。
Psychometrika. 2013 Jan;78(1):14-36. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9296-y. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
6
Latent transition analysis: inference and estimation.潜在转变分析:推断与估计
Stat Med. 2008 May 20;27(11):1834-54. doi: 10.1002/sim.3130.
7
Using data augmentation to obtain standard errors and conduct hypothesis tests in latent class and latent transition analysis.在潜在类别和潜在转变分析中使用数据增强来获取标准误差并进行假设检验。
Psychol Methods. 2005 Mar;10(1):84-100. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.84.