• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

步行安全:基于模糊逻辑应用的安全路由规划算法和行人穿越意图检测器。

Walking Secure: Safe Routing Planning Algorithm and Pedestrian's Crossing Intention Detector Based on Fuzzy Logic App.

机构信息

Department of Electronic Engineering, Computer Systems and Automatics, University of Huelva, Av. de las Artes s/n, 21007 Huelva, Spain.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 13;21(2):529. doi: 10.3390/s21020529.

DOI:10.3390/s21020529
PMID:33451012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7828533/
Abstract

Improving road safety through artificial intelligence is now crucial to achieving more secure smart cities. With this objective, a mobile app based on the integration of the smartphone sensors and a fuzzy logic strategy to determine the pedestrian's crossing intention around crosswalks is presented. The app developed also allows the calculation, tracing and guidance of safe routes thanks to an optimization algorithm that includes pedestrian areas on the paths generated over the whole city through a cloud database (i.e., zebra crossings, pedestrian streets and walkways). The experimentation carried out consisted in testing the fuzzy logic strategy with a total of 31 volunteers crossing and walking around a crosswalk. For that, the fuzzy logic approach was subjected to a total of 3120 samples generated by the volunteers. It has been proven that a smartphone can be successfully used as a crossing intention detector system with an accuracy of 98.63%, obtaining a true positive rate of 98.27% and a specificity of 99.39% according to a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Finally, a total of 30 routes were calculated by the proposed algorithm and compared with Google Maps considering the values of time, distance and safety along the routes. As a result, the routes generated by the proposed algorithm were safer than the routes obtained with Google Maps, achieving an increase in the use of safe pedestrian areas of at least 183%.

摘要

通过人工智能提高道路安全对于实现更安全的智慧城市至关重要。为此,提出了一种基于智能手机传感器集成和模糊逻辑策略的移动应用程序,用于确定行人和在十字路口周围的过马路意图。该应用程序还可以通过优化算法计算、跟踪和引导安全路线,该算法包括在整个城市的生成路径上的行人区域(即斑马线、步行街和人行道)的云数据库。进行的实验包括使用总共 31 名志愿者在十字路口进行测试,测试模糊逻辑策略。为此,志愿者总共生成了 3120 个样本,对模糊逻辑方法进行了测试。结果证明,智能手机可以成功用作具有 98.63%准确率的过马路意图检测系统,根据接收者操作特征分析,得到了 98.27%的真阳性率和 99.39%的特异性。最后,根据提出的算法总共计算了 30 条路线,并与谷歌地图进行了比较,考虑了路线上的时间、距离和安全性。结果表明,与谷歌地图相比,提出的算法生成的路线更安全,至少增加了 183%的安全行人区域的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/76ce577442b4/sensors-21-00529-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/13a9c29a9229/sensors-21-00529-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/d473947c9080/sensors-21-00529-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/8168997c2152/sensors-21-00529-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/0a5363394326/sensors-21-00529-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/ec02e5fc158d/sensors-21-00529-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/46c8da85a59e/sensors-21-00529-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/9743e392c9a9/sensors-21-00529-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/76ce577442b4/sensors-21-00529-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/13a9c29a9229/sensors-21-00529-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/d473947c9080/sensors-21-00529-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/8168997c2152/sensors-21-00529-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/0a5363394326/sensors-21-00529-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/ec02e5fc158d/sensors-21-00529-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/46c8da85a59e/sensors-21-00529-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/9743e392c9a9/sensors-21-00529-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d92/7828533/76ce577442b4/sensors-21-00529-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Walking Secure: Safe Routing Planning Algorithm and Pedestrian's Crossing Intention Detector Based on Fuzzy Logic App.步行安全:基于模糊逻辑应用的安全路由规划算法和行人穿越意图检测器。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 13;21(2):529. doi: 10.3390/s21020529.
2
A New Pedestrian Crossing Level of Service (PCLOS) Method for Promoting Safe Pedestrian Crossing in Urban Areas.一种用于促进城市地区安全行人过街的新型行人过街服务水平(PCLOS)方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;18(16):8813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168813.
3
Quantitative analysis of pedestrian safety at uncontrolled multi-lane mid-block crosswalks in China.中国无控制多车道路段人行横道行人安全的定量分析
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
4
Vision-Based Pedestrian's Crossing Risky Behavior Extraction and Analysis for Intelligent Mobility Safety System.基于视觉的行人过马路危险行为提取与分析用于智能交通系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 30;22(9):3451. doi: 10.3390/s22093451.
5
Gap acceptance probability model for pedestrians at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks based on logistic regression.基于逻辑回归的无信号控制路段行人间隙接受概率模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 22.
6
A comparative study of safe and unsafe signalized intersections from the view point of pedestrian behavior and perception.从行人和感知的角度对安全和不安全信号交叉口的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Nov;132:105218. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
7
Modeling pedestrian's conformity violation behavior: a complex network based approach.建模行人的从众违规行为:一种基于复杂网络的方法。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2014;2014:865750. doi: 10.1155/2014/865750. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
8
The paradox of pedestrian's risk aversion.行人风险规避悖论。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105518. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105518. Epub 2020 May 20.
9
A novel framework to evaluate pedestrian safety at non-signalized locations.一种评估无信号控制区域行人安全的新框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Feb;111:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.015.
10
Exploring the Determinants of the Severity of Pedestrian Injuries by Pedestrian Age: A Case Study of Daegu Metropolitan City, South Korea.探讨行人年龄对行人伤害严重程度的影响因素:以韩国大邱广域市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072358.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing safe mobility: A global analysis of research trends in safe route planning.推进安全出行:安全路线规划研究趋势的全球分析
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 26;9(12):e22755. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22755. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Application of EMGB to Study Impacts of Public Green Space on Active Transport Behavior: Evidence from South Korea.EMGB 在研究公共绿地对积极交通行为的影响中的应用:来自韩国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127459.
3
A Survey of Human Gait-Based Artificial Intelligence Applications.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Sensory Detection of Vehicles in Intelligent Crosswalks.分析应用于智能人行横道车辆感官检测的机器学习技术。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 23;20(21):6019. doi: 10.3390/s20216019.
2
Research on a Pedestrian Crossing Intention Recognition Model Based on Natural Observation Data.基于自然观测数据的行人过街意图识别模型研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 23;20(6):1776. doi: 10.3390/s20061776.
3
Review on V2X, I2X, and P2X Communications and Their Applications: A Comprehensive Analysis over Time.
基于人类步态的人工智能应用综述。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Jan 3;8:749274. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.749274. eCollection 2021.
4
Feasibility of Using a MEMS Microphone Array for Pedestrian Detection in an Autonomous Emergency Braking System.用于自动驾驶紧急制动系统中行人检测的 MEMS 麦克风阵列的可行性。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 17;21(12):4162. doi: 10.3390/s21124162.
V2X、I2X和P2X通信及其应用综述:随时间的综合分析
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jun 19;19(12):2756. doi: 10.3390/s19122756.
4
A System for Generating Customized Pleasant Pedestrian Routes Based on OpenStreetMap Data.基于 OpenStreetMap 数据的定制化宜人步行路径生成系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Nov 6;18(11):3794. doi: 10.3390/s18113794.
5
On-Board Detection of Pedestrian Intentions.车载行人意图检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Sep 23;17(10):2193. doi: 10.3390/s17102193.