Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, University of Southern California, 2051 Marengo Street, Inpatient Tower (C), 5th Floor, C5L100, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
World J Surg. 2021 Apr;45(4):1014-1020. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05906-3. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
Routine four-quadrant packing (4QP) for hemorrhage control immediately upon opening is a standard practice for acute trauma laparotomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of 4QP for bleeding control in acutely injured patients undergoing trauma laparotomy.
Retrospective single-center study (01/2015-07/2019), including adult patients who underwent trauma laparotomy within 4 h of admission. Only patients with active intra-abdominal hemorrhage, defined as bleeding within the peritoneal cavity or expanding retroperitoneal hematoma, were considered for analysis. Bleeding sources were categorized anatomically: liver/retrohepatic inferior vena cava (RIVC), spleen, retroperitoneal zones 1, 2 and 3, mesentery and others. Hemorrhage was further categorized as originating from a single bleeding site (SBS) or from multiple bleeding sites (MBS). The effectiveness of directed versus 4QP was evaluated for bleeding from the liver/RIVC, spleen and retroperitoneal zone 3, areas that are potentially compressible. Directed packing was defined as indicated if the bleeding was restricted to one of the anatomic sites suitable for packing, 4QP was defined as indicated if ≥ 2 of the anatomic sites suitable for packing were bleeding.
During the study time frame, 924 patients underwent trauma laparotomy, of which 148 (16%) had active intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Of these, 47% had a SBS and 53% had MBS. The liver/RIVC was the most common bleeding source in both patients with SBS (42%) and in patients with MBS (54%). According to our predefined indications, 22 of 148 patients (15%) would have benefitted from initial 4QP, 90 of 148 patients (61%) from directed packing and 36 of 148 patients (24%) packing would not have been of any value.
Routine four-quadrant packing is frequently practiced. However, this is only required in a small proportion of patients undergoing trauma laparotomy. Directed packing can be equally effective, saves time and decreases the risk of iatrogenic injury from unnecessary packing.
在急性创伤性剖腹手术中,一打开腹腔就立即进行常规的四象限填塞(4QP)以控制出血是一种标准做法。本研究的目的是评估 4QP 在接受创伤性剖腹手术的急性受伤患者中控制出血的效果。
这是一项回顾性单中心研究(2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 7 月),包括在入院后 4 小时内接受创伤性剖腹手术的成年患者。仅对有明确的腹腔内出血(定义为腹腔内出血或扩大的腹膜后血肿)的患者进行分析。出血源按解剖部位分类:肝/肝后下腔静脉(RIVC)、脾、腹膜后区域 1、2 和 3、肠系膜和其他部位。进一步将出血分为单一出血部位(SBS)或多个出血部位(MBS)。评估了对于肝/肝后下腔静脉、脾和腹膜后区域 3 的定向填塞与 4QP 的效果,这些部位是潜在可压缩的。如果出血仅限于适合填塞的解剖部位之一,则定义为定向填塞;如果有≥2 个适合填塞的解剖部位在出血,则定义为 4QP 适用。
在研究期间,924 名患者接受了创伤性剖腹手术,其中 148 名(16%)有明确的腹腔内出血。这些患者中,47%有 SBS,53%有 MBS。SBS 和 MBS 患者中,肝/肝后下腔静脉都是最常见的出血源(42%和 54%)。根据我们的预设指征,148 名患者中有 22 名(15%)最初需要进行 4QP,90 名(61%)需要进行定向填塞,36 名(24%)进行填塞不会有任何价值。
常规的四象限填塞经常实施。然而,这只在一小部分接受创伤性剖腹手术的患者中需要。定向填塞同样有效,可以节省时间并降低因不必要填塞而导致的医源性损伤的风险。