School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University), Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021 Sep;68(5):2643-2656. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13993. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
Since 2007, African swine fever virus (ASFV) has spread to countries in Europe, Asia and Oceania and has caused devastating impacts on pigs and the pork industry. Transmission can be direct or indirect, and epidemiologic scenarios have been described in which spread occurs between free-living and domestic pigs. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify primary research in which authors made statements to support ASFV transmission between free-living and domestic pigs and assess the circumstances in which transmission events occurred. A search was conducted in five bibliographic databases and the grey literature. Two reviewers (from a team of ten) independently screened each record and charted data (demographics of the pig populations, their husbandry [domestic pigs] and habitat [free-living pigs], the spatial and temporal distribution of ASF, the occurrence or burden of ASF in the populations, and whether ticks were present in the geographic range of the pig populations). Data synthesis included statistics and a narrative summary. From 1,349 records screened, data were charted from 46 individual studies published from 1985 to 2020. Outbreak investigations revealed that whilst poor biosecurity of domestic pig operations was often reported, direct contact resulting in transmission between free-living and domestic pigs was rarely reported. Studies in which quantitative associations were made generally found that spread within populations was more important than spread between populations, although this was not always the case, particularly when domestic pigs were free-ranging. We conclude that there is limited evidence that transmission of ASFV between free-living and domestic pigs is an important feature of ASF epidemiology, especially in the current ASF epidemic in Europe and the Russian Federation. If ASFV elimination cannot be achieved in free-living pigs, compartmentalization of domestic pig populations from free-living populations via biosecurity strategies could be used to support trade of domestic pigs.
自 2007 年以来,非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)已传播到欧洲、亚洲和大洋洲的国家,并对猪和猪肉产业造成了毁灭性的影响。传播可以是直接的,也可以是间接的,已经描述了一些流行病学情况,即在自由放养和家猪之间发生了传播。本范围综述的目的是确定作者发表声明支持 ASFV 在自由放养和家猪之间传播的主要研究,并评估传播事件发生的情况。在五个书目数据库和灰色文献中进行了搜索。两名审查员(来自十名团队成员)独立筛选了每个记录并记录数据(猪群的人口统计学、其饲养方式[家猪]和栖息地[自由放养猪]、ASF 的时空分布、ASF 在猪群中的发生或负担,以及在猪群的地理范围内是否存在蜱)。数据综合包括统计数据和叙述性摘要。从筛选的 1349 条记录中,从 1985 年至 2020 年发表的 46 项单独研究中提取了数据。暴发调查显示,尽管经常报告家猪业务的生物安全措施不佳,但很少报告自由放养和家猪之间直接接触导致的传播。进行定量关联研究的一般发现,种群内的传播比种群间的传播更为重要,尽管并非总是如此,特别是当家猪自由放养时。我们的结论是,有有限的证据表明 ASFV 在自由放养和家猪之间的传播是 ASF 流行病学的一个重要特征,尤其是在欧洲和俄罗斯联邦目前的 ASF 疫情中。如果不能在家猪中消灭 ASFV,可以通过生物安全策略将家猪种群与自由放养种群隔离开来,以支持家猪的贸易。