Haas Bianca, Mackay Mary, Novaglio Camilla, Fullbrook Liam, Murunga Michael, Sbrocchi Carla, McDonald Jan, McCormack Phillipa C, Alexander Karen, Fudge Maree, Goldsworthy Lyn, Boschetti Fabio, Dutton Ian, Dutra Leo, McGee Jeffrey, Rousseau Yannick, Spain Erica, Stephenson Robert, Vince Joanna, Wilcox Chris, Haward Marcus
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2022;32(1):253-270. doi: 10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
Ocean governance is complex and influenced by multiple drivers and actors with different worldviews and goals. While governance encompasses many elements, in this paper we focus on the processes that operate within and between states, civil society and local communities, and the market, including industry. Specifically, in this paper, we address the question of how to move towards more sustainable ocean governance aligning with the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the UN Ocean Decade. We address three major risks to oceans that arise from governance-related issues: (1) the impacts of the overexploitation of marine resources; (2) inequitable distribution of access to and benefits from marine ecosystem services, and (3) inadequate or inappropriate adaptation to changing ocean conditions. The SDGs have been used as an underlying framework to develop these risks. We identify five drivers that may determine how ocean governance evolves, namely formal rules and institutions, evidence and knowledge-based decision-making, legitimacy of decision-making institutions, stakeholder engagement and participation, and empowering communities. These drivers were used to define two alternative futures by 2030: (a) 'Business as Usual'-a continuation of current trajectories and (b) 'More Sustainable Future'-optimistic, transformational, but technically achievable. We then identify what actions, as structured processes, can reduce the three major governance-related risks and lead to the More Sustainable Future. These actions relate to the process of co-creation and implementation of improved, comprehensive, and integrated management plans, enhancement of decision-making processes, and better anticipation and consideration of ambiguity and uncertainty.
The online version of this article (10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
海洋治理复杂,受多种驱动因素和行为体影响,这些行为体有着不同的世界观和目标。虽然治理包含许多要素,但在本文中,我们关注在国家、民间社会和地方社区以及市场(包括行业)内部和之间运作的过程。具体而言,在本文中,我们探讨如何朝着与可持续发展目标(SDGs)和联合国海洋十年相一致的更可持续的海洋治理迈进。我们阐述了由治理相关问题引发的对海洋的三大主要风险:(1)海洋资源过度开发的影响;(2)海洋生态系统服务获取和收益的不公平分配,以及(3)对不断变化的海洋状况适应不足或不当。可持续发展目标已被用作阐述这些风险的基础框架。我们确定了五个可能决定海洋治理如何演变的驱动因素,即正式规则和制度、基于证据和知识的决策、决策机构的合法性、利益相关者的参与以及赋能社区。这些驱动因素被用于定义到2030年的两种不同未来:(a)“照常行事”——当前轨迹的延续,以及(b) “更可持续的未来”——乐观、变革性但在技术上可实现。然后,我们确定作为结构化过程的哪些行动可以降低与治理相关的三大主要风险,并通向更可持续的未来。这些行动涉及共同创建和实施改进的、全面的和综合的管理计划的过程、加强决策过程,以及更好地预测和考虑模糊性和不确定性。
本文的在线版本(10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x)包含补充材料,授权用户可获取。