Suppr超能文献

美国天然薄荷烟吸烟者的暴露生物标志物及潜在危害

Biomarkers of Exposure and Potential Harm among Natural American Spirit Smokers.

作者信息

Carroll Dana M, Allenzara Astia, Jensen Joni, Stepanov Irina, Hecht Stephen, Murphy Sharon, Luo Xianghua, Donny Eric, Hatsukami Dorothy K

机构信息

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Tob Regul Sci. 2019 Jul;5(4):339-351. doi: 10.18001/trs.5.4.4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared biomarkers of exposure and potential harm in smokers of American Spirit (AS) to smokers of Marlboro, Newport, Camel, and Pall Mall.

METHODS

We conducted secondary analysis on: (1) data from a randomized clinical trial (RCT); and (2) the Population Assessment of Tobacco Use and Health (PATH) Study. Biomarkers analyzed included: total nicotine equivalents (TNE); 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol and its glucuronides (total NNAL); '-nitrosonornicotine and its -glucuronide (total NNN);3-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid(3-HPMA); 2-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid (2-HPMA), 3-hydroxy-1 methylpropylmercapturic acid (HMPMA); S-phenylmercapturic acid(SPMA); 2-cyanoethylmercapturic acid (CEMA); phenanthrene tetraol(PheT);1-hydroxypyrene (1-HOP);8--PGF; white blood count(WBC); prostaglandin E metabolite(PGEM); and high sensitivity C-reactive protein(hsCRP).

RESULTS

AS smokers did not differ in TNE but had higher TNE per cigarette compared to other brands. Total NNAL, total NNN, CEMA, and 3-HPMA were lower in AS smokers. All other biomarkers were no different in AS smokers compared to all or the majority of the other brands.

CONCLUSIONS

Levels of total NNAL, total NNN, acrylonitrile, and acrolein were reduced in AS smokers; however, it is not known whether reductions in exposure to these toxicants contribute to reduced harm. Higher TNE per cigarette smoked in AS smokers suggests a greater addictive potential compared to other brands. Regulatory action to ensure that consumers are not misled about the risks of the AS brand are recommended.

摘要

目的

我们比较了吸食美国精神(AS)香烟者与吸食万宝路、新港、骆驼和百乐门香烟者的接触生物标志物和潜在危害。

方法

我们对以下数据进行了二次分析:(1)一项随机临床试验(RCT)的数据;(2)烟草使用与健康人口评估(PATH)研究。分析的生物标志物包括:总尼古丁当量(TNE);4-(甲基亚硝胺基)-1-(3-吡啶基)-1-丁醇及其葡糖醛酸苷(总NNAL);'-亚硝基去甲烟碱及其-葡糖醛酸苷(总NNN);3-羟丙基巯基尿酸(3-HPMA);2-羟丙基巯基尿酸(2-HPMA),3-羟基-1-甲基丙基巯基尿酸(HMPMA);S-苯基巯基尿酸(SPMA);2-氰基乙基巯基尿酸(CEMA);菲四醇(PheT);1-羟基芘(1-HOP);8-异前列腺素F(8-iso-PGF);白细胞计数(WBC);前列腺素E代谢物(PGEM);以及高敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)。

结果

AS吸烟者的TNE无差异,但与其他品牌相比,每支香烟的TNE更高。AS吸烟者的总NNAL、总NNN、CEMA和3-HPMA较低。与所有或大多数其他品牌相比,AS吸烟者的所有其他生物标志物无差异。

结论

AS吸烟者的总NNAL、总NNN、丙烯腈和丙烯醛水平降低;然而,尚不清楚这些有毒物质接触量的减少是否有助于降低危害。与其他品牌相比,AS吸烟者每支香烟吸食的TNE更高,表明其成瘾潜力更大。建议采取监管行动,以确保消费者不会被AS品牌的风险所误导。

相似文献

1
Biomarkers of Exposure and Potential Harm among Natural American Spirit Smokers.
Tob Regul Sci. 2019 Jul;5(4):339-351. doi: 10.18001/trs.5.4.4.
3
Evaluation of toxicant and carcinogen metabolites in the urine of e-cigarette users versus cigarette smokers.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Jun;17(6):704-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu218. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
4
Longitudinal stability in cigarette smokers of urinary biomarkers of exposure to the toxicants acrylonitrile and acrolein.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):e0210104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210104. eCollection 2019.
5
Association of Urinary Biomarkers of Smoking-Related Toxicants with Lung Cancer Incidence in Smokers: The Multiethnic Cohort Study.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Mar 6;32(3):306-314. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0569.
6
Comparison of Biomarkers of Tobacco Exposure between Premium and Discount Brand Cigarette Smokers in the NHANES 2011-2012 Special Sample.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 May;27(5):601-609. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0869. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
9
Differences in exposure to toxic and/or carcinogenic volatile organic compounds between Black and White cigarette smokers.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;31(2):211-223. doi: 10.1038/s41370-019-0159-9. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive Chemical Characterization of Natural American Spirit Cigarettes.
Tob Regul Sci. 2019 Jul;5(4):381-399. doi: 10.18001/trs.5.4.8.
3
Cigarette Smokers Versus Cousers of Cannabis and Cigarettes: Exposure to Toxicants.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Jul 16;22(8):1383-1389. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz199.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive Chemical Characterization of Natural American Spirit Cigarettes.
Tob Regul Sci. 2019 Jul;5(4):381-399. doi: 10.18001/trs.5.4.8.
3
Natural American Spirit Brand Marketing Casts Health Halo Around Smoking.
Am J Public Health. 2017 May;107(5):668-670. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303719.
4
Acrolein Yields in Mainstream Smoke From Commercial Cigarette and Little Cigar Tobacco Products.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):865-870. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx003.
5
High particulate matter emission from additive-free Natural American Spirit cigarettes.
Springerplus. 2016 Nov 11;5(1):1958. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3635-x. eCollection 2016.
7
Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.
Tob Control. 2017 Jul;26(4):371-378. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052934. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
8
Perceptions of "Natural" and "Additive-Free" Cigarettes and Intentions to Purchase.
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Apr;44(2):222-226. doi: 10.1177/1090198116653935. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
9
American Spirit Pack Descriptors and Perceptions of Harm: A Crowdsourced Comparison of Modified Packs.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Aug;18(8):1749-56. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw097. Epub 2016 May 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验