• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索基于模拟的医疗保健教育中的医疗差错分类法和人为因素。

Exploring medical error taxonomies and human factors in simulation-based healthcare education.

作者信息

Skrisovska Tamara, Schwarz Daniel, Kosinova Martina, Stourac Petr

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Simulation Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0317128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317128. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0317128
PMID:39823397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11741583/
Abstract

This study aims to provide an updated overview of medical error taxonomies by building on a robust review conducted in 2011. It seeks to identify the key characteristics of the most suitable taxonomy for use in high-fidelity simulation-based postgraduate courses in Critical Care. While many taxonomies are available, none seem to be explicitly designed for the unique context of healthcare simulation-based education, in which errors are regarded as essential learning opportunities. Rather than creating a new classification system, this study proposes integrating existing taxonomies to enhance their applicability in simulation training. Through data from surveys of participants and tutors in postgraduate simulation-based courses, this study provides an exploratory analysis of whether a generic or domain-specific taxonomy is more suitable for healthcare education. While a generic classification may cover a broad spectrum of errors, a domain-specific approach could be more relatable and practical for healthcare professionals in a given domain, potentially improving error-reporting rates. Seven strong links were identified in the reviewed classification systems. These correlations allowed the authors to propose various simulation training strategies to address the errors identified in both the classification systems. This approach focuses on error management and fostering a safety culture, aiming to reduce communication-related errors by introducing the principles of Crisis Resource Management, effective communication methods, and overall teamwork improvement. The gathered data contributes to a better understanding and training of the most prevalent medical errors, with significant correlations found between different medical error taxonomies, suggesting that addressing one can positively impact others. The study highlights the importance of simulation-based education in healthcare for error management and analysis.

摘要

本研究旨在以2011年进行的一项全面综述为基础,提供医学错误分类法的最新概述。它试图确定最适合用于重症监护研究生高保真模拟课程的分类法的关键特征。虽然有许多分类法可供使用,但似乎没有一种是专门为基于医疗模拟的教育这一独特背景设计的,在这种背景下,错误被视为重要的学习机会。本研究不是创建一个新的分类系统,而是提议整合现有分类法,以提高其在模拟训练中的适用性。通过对基于模拟的研究生课程参与者和导师的调查数据,本研究对通用分类法或特定领域分类法是否更适合医疗教育进行了探索性分析。虽然通用分类法可能涵盖广泛的错误,但特定领域的方法对于特定领域的医疗专业人员可能更具相关性和实用性,有可能提高错误报告率。在所审查的分类系统中确定了七个强关联。这些相关性使作者能够提出各种模拟训练策略,以解决分类系统中识别出的错误。这种方法侧重于错误管理和培养安全文化,旨在通过引入危机资源管理原则、有效的沟通方法和整体团队合作改进来减少与沟通相关的错误。收集到的数据有助于更好地理解和训练最常见的医疗错误,不同医学错误分类法之间存在显著相关性,这表明解决一个问题可以对其他问题产生积极影响。该研究强调了基于模拟的教育在医疗保健中进行错误管理和分析的重要性。

相似文献

1
Exploring medical error taxonomies and human factors in simulation-based healthcare education.探索基于模拟的医疗保健教育中的医疗差错分类法和人为因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0317128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317128. eCollection 2025.
2
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the French version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire.跨文化验证和心理计量测试法语版的团队 STEPPS 团队工作感知问卷。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Aug 29;38(6):923-941. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0004.
3
"SIMBurns": A high-fidelity simulation program in emergency burn management developed through international collaboration.“SIMBurns”:一个通过国际合作开发的用于紧急烧伤管理的高保真模拟程序。
Burns. 2019 Feb;45(1):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.08.030. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Enhancing patient safety: detection of in-hospital hazards and effect of training on detection (by training in a low-fidelity simulation Room of Improvement based on hospital-specific CIRS cases).提高患者安全性:检测医院内的危害以及培训对检测的影响(通过基于医院特定 CIRS 病例的改进型低真实度模拟室进行培训)。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 29;13(2):e002608. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002608.
6
Improving patient safety through better teamwork: how effective are different methods of simulation debriefing? Protocol for a pragmatic, prospective and randomised study.通过改善团队协作提高患者安全:不同模拟总结方法的效果如何?一项实用、前瞻性随机研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e015977. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015977.
7
Crisis management in the operating room: A systematic review of simulation training to develop non-technical skills.手术室中的危机管理:对培养非技术技能的模拟培训的系统评价
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Apr;147:106583. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106583. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
8
Simulation in medicine: addressing patient safety and improving the interface between healthcare providers and medical technology.
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2006 Sep-Oct;40(5):399-404. doi: 10.2345/i0899-8205-40-5-399.1.
9
Examining Barriers and Motivations to Speak up on Medical Errors in a Simulated Clinical Emergency: A Mixed-Methods Study.在模拟临床紧急情况下探讨就医疗差错发声的障碍与动机:一项混合方法研究。
Teach Learn Med. 2025 Jan-Mar;37(1):41-55. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2290611. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
10
Improving Team Performance Through Simulation-Based Learning.通过基于模拟的学习提高团队绩效。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;50(5):967-987. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.05.008.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Interrater Agreement of a Novel Classification System Combining Medical and Surgical Adverse Event Reporting.一种新的医疗和手术不良事件报告分类系统的制定和组内一致性检验。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 May 1;149(5):424-429. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0169.
2
How Communication "Failed" or "Saved the Day": Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors.沟通如何“失败”或“扭转局面”:医疗差错的反事实叙述
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1247-1254. doi: 10.1177/2374373520925270. Epub 2020 May 26.
3
Organizational readiness for artificial intelligence in health care: insights for decision-making and practice.
医疗保健领域人工智能的组织准备:决策和实践的见解。
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 Dec 3;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2020-0074.
4
A Machine Learning Approach to Reclassifying Miscellaneous Patient Safety Event Reports.机器学习在重新分类患者安全事件报告中的应用
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e829-e833. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000731.
5
Analysis of Human Performance Deficiencies Associated With Surgical Adverse Events.分析与手术不良事件相关的人为绩效缺陷。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e198067. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8067.
6
Critical Review, Development, and Testing of a Taxonomy for Adverse Events and Near Misses in the Emergency Department.急诊不良事件和未遂事件分类的批判性回顾、制定和测试。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):670-679. doi: 10.1111/acem.13724. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
Defining attributes of patient safety through a concept analysis.通过概念分析界定患者安全的属性
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Nov;71(11):2490-503. doi: 10.1111/jan.12715. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
8
'Tempos' management in primary care: a key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety.初级保健中的‘tempos’管理:分类不良事件、提高质量和安全性的关键因素。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Sep;21(9):729-36. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-048710.
9
Understanding health care as a complex system: the foundation for unintended consequences.将医疗保健理解为一个复杂系统:意外后果的根源。
JAMA. 2012 Jul 18;308(3):243-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7551.
10
Becoming a high reliability organization.成为一个高可靠性组织。
Crit Care. 2011;15(6):314. doi: 10.1186/cc10360. Epub 2011 Dec 8.