• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

UriSed 3 PRO自动尿液显微镜在区域实验室环境中的验证。

Verification of UriSed 3 PRO automated urine microscope in regional laboratory environment.

作者信息

Kouri Timo, Alagrund Katariina, Lehtonen Maaret, Tohmola Niina, Pihlajamaa Tero, Kouri Vesa-Petteri, Friman Sirpa, Holma Tanja, Kirjavainen Vesa, Pätäri-Sampo Anu, Lempiäinen Anna

机构信息

Department of Clinical Chemistry, HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Diagnostic Center, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Clinical Chemistry, HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Diagnostic Center, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2021 Apr;515:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2021.01.005
PMID:33460593
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ten UriSed 3 PRO automated microscopes (77 Elektronika, Hungary) were verified for nine HUSLAB laboratories with 160 000 annual urine samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Particle counting of the primary UriSed 3 PRO instrument (77 Elektronika, Hungary) was verified against reference visual microscopy with 463 urine specimens, and against urine culture on chromogenic agar plates with parallel 396 specimens. Nine secondary instruments were compared pairwise with the primary instrument.

RESULTS

Relative imprecisions compared to Poisson distribution, R(CV), were estimated to be 1.0 for white blood cell (WBC) and 1.5 for red blood cell (RBC) counts, respectively. Spearman's correlations against visual microscopy were r = 0.94 for WBC, r = 0.87 for RBC, and r = 0.82 for squamous epithelial cell (SEC) counts. Agreement with visual microscopy (Cohen's weighted kappa) was 0.94 for WBC, 0.89 for RBC, 0.88 for SEC, 0.59 for combined casts, and 0.49 for non-squamous epithelial cells (NEC). Bacteria were detected with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 39 against culture at 10 CFB/L (10 CFU/mL). Created flagging limits allowed automated reporting for 70-75% of patient results.

CONCLUSIONS

UriSed 3 PRO instruments were adopted into routine use after acceptance of the verification.

摘要

背景与目的

对10台UriSed 3 PRO自动显微镜(匈牙利77 Elektronika公司)进行了验证,这些显微镜供9个HUSLAB实验室使用,这些实验室每年处理160000份尿液样本。

材料与方法

使用463份尿液标本,将UriSed 3 PRO主要仪器(匈牙利77 Elektronika公司)的颗粒计数与参考目视显微镜检查结果进行对比,并使用396份平行标本与显色琼脂平板上的尿液培养结果进行对比。将9台辅助仪器与主要仪器进行两两比较。

结果

与泊松分布相比,白细胞(WBC)计数的相对不精密度R(CV)估计为1.0,红细胞(RBC)计数为1.5。与目视显微镜检查的Spearman相关性,白细胞为r = 0.94,红细胞为r = 0.87,鳞状上皮细胞(SEC)计数为r = 0.82。与目视显微镜检查的一致性(Cohen加权kappa值),白细胞为0.94,红细胞为0.89,SEC为0.88,混合管型为0.59,非鳞状上皮细胞(NEC)为0.49。检测细菌的灵敏度为90%,与10CFB/L(10CFU/mL)培养结果相比特异性为39。设定的标记限值允许对70 - 75%的患者结果进行自动报告。

结论

验证通过后,UriSed 3 PRO仪器被投入常规使用。

相似文献

1
Verification of UriSed 3 PRO automated urine microscope in regional laboratory environment.UriSed 3 PRO自动尿液显微镜在区域实验室环境中的验证。
Clin Chim Acta. 2021 Apr;515:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
2
UriSed 3 PRO automated microscope in screening bacteriuria at region-wide laboratory organization.UriSed 3 PRO自动显微镜在全区域实验室组织中用于筛查菌尿症。
Clin Chim Acta. 2021 May;516:149-156. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.01.022. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
3
Clinical laboratory urine analysis: comparison of the UriSed automated microscopic analyzer and the manual microscopy.临床实验室尿液分析:UriSed自动显微镜分析仪与手工显微镜检查的比较
Clin Lab. 2013;59(11-12):1297-303. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2013.121128.
4
UriSed 3 and UX-2000 automated urine sediment analyzers vs manual microscopic method: A comparative performance analysis.UriSed 3和UX - 2000自动尿沉渣分析仪与手工显微镜检查法的比较性能分析
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Feb;32(2). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22249. Epub 2017 May 2.
5
UriSed - Preliminary reference intervals and optimal method for urine sediment analysis in newborns and infants.UriSed——新生儿和婴儿尿液沉渣分析的初步参考区间及最佳方法。
Clin Biochem. 2016 Aug;49(12):909-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
6
Urine sediment analysis: Analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX - a new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser.尿液沉渣分析:sediMAX-一种新型自动化显微镜成像尿液沉渣分析仪的分析和诊断性能。
Clin Chim Acta. 2010 Feb;411(3-4):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.10.018. Epub 2009 Oct 25.
7
Comparison of LabUMat-with-UriSed and iQ200 fully automatic urine sediment analysers with manual urine analysis.LabUMat-with-UriSed全自动尿沉渣分析仪与iQ200全自动尿沉渣分析仪与手工尿液分析的比较。
Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2009 Jun;53(Pt 2):139-44. doi: 10.1042/BA20080188.
8
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of two automated urine sediment analyzers with manual phase-contrast microscopy.两种自动化尿液沉渣分析仪与人工相差显微镜检查的诊断性能比较。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jan 28;58(2):268-273. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0919.
9
Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and LabUMat-UriSed with manual microscopy.H800-FUS100 和 LabUMat-UriSed 全自动尿沉渣分析仪与人工显微镜比较。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2013 Jul;27(4):312-6. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21604.
10
Comparative Performance Analysis of Urised 3 and DIRUI FUS-200 Automated Urine Sediment Analyzers and Manual Microscopic Method.Urised 3与迪瑞FUS-200全自动尿沉渣分析仪及手工显微镜法的对比性能分析
Medeni Med J. 2019;34(3):244-251. doi: 10.5222/MMJ.2019.23169. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Labsan Tricell-1000 and Dirui FUS-2000 automated urine analyzers with manual microscopy.Labsan Tricell-1000和迪瑞FUS-2000自动尿液分析仪与手工显微镜检查的比较。
Pract Lab Med. 2024 Feb 29;39:e00386. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00386. eCollection 2024 Mar.