• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

H800-FUS100 和 LabUMat-UriSed 全自动尿沉渣分析仪与人工显微镜比较。

Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and LabUMat-UriSed with manual microscopy.

机构信息

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2013 Jul;27(4):312-6. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21604.

DOI:10.1002/jcla.21604
PMID:23852791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6807495/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent technical developments have focused on the full automation of urinalyses, however the manual microscopic analysis of urine sediment is considered the reference method. The aim of this study was to compare the performances of the LabUMat-UriSed and the H800-FUS100 with manual microscopy, and with each other.

METHODS

The urine sediments of 332 urine samples were examined by these two devices (LabUMat-UriSed, H800-FUS100) and manual microscopy.

RESULTS

The reproducibility of the analyzers, UriSed and Fus100 (4.1-28.5% and 4.7-21.2%, respectively), was better than that with manual microscopy (8.5-33.3%). The UriSed was more sensitive for leukocytes (82%), while the Fus-100 was more sensitive for erythrocyte cell counting (73%). There were moderate correlations between manual microscopy and the two devices, UriSed and Fus100, for erythrocyte (r = 0.496 and 0.498, respectively) and leukocyte (r = 0.597 and 0.599, respectively) cell counting however the correlation between the two devices was much better for erythrocyte (r = 0.643) and for leukocyte (r = 0.767) cell counting.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that these two devices showed similar performances. They were time-saving and standardized techniques, especially for reducing preanalytical errors such as the study time, centrifugation, and specimen volume for sedimentary analysis; however, the automated systems are still inadequate for classifying the cells that are present in pathological urine specimens.

摘要

背景

最近的技术发展集中在尿液分析的完全自动化上,然而尿液沉渣的手动显微镜分析仍被认为是参考方法。本研究旨在比较 LabUMat-UriSed 和 H800-FUS100 与手动显微镜以及彼此之间的性能。

方法

使用这两种设备(LabUMat-UriSed、H800-FUS100)和手动显微镜检查 332 个尿液样本的尿液沉淀物。

结果

分析仪 UriSed 和 Fus100 的重现性(分别为 4.1-28.5%和 4.7-21.2%)优于手动显微镜(8.5-33.3%)。UriSed 对白细胞更敏感(82%),而 Fus-100 对红细胞计数更敏感(73%)。手动显微镜与两种设备 UriSed 和 Fus100 之间的红细胞(r = 0.496 和 0.498,分别)和白细胞(r = 0.597 和 0.599,分别)计数均有中度相关性,但两种设备之间的相关性更好红细胞(r = 0.643)和白细胞(r = 0.767)细胞计数。

结论

可以得出结论,这两种设备表现出相似的性能。它们是节省时间和标准化的技术,特别是可以减少分析沉淀物所需的预分析错误,例如研究时间、离心和标本量;然而,自动化系统仍然不足以对存在于病理性尿液标本中的细胞进行分类。

相似文献

1
Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and LabUMat-UriSed with manual microscopy.H800-FUS100 和 LabUMat-UriSed 全自动尿沉渣分析仪与人工显微镜比较。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2013 Jul;27(4):312-6. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21604.
2
UriSed - Preliminary reference intervals and optimal method for urine sediment analysis in newborns and infants.UriSed——新生儿和婴儿尿液沉渣分析的初步参考区间及最佳方法。
Clin Biochem. 2016 Aug;49(12):909-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
3
Comparison of LabUMat-with-UriSed and iQ200 fully automatic urine sediment analysers with manual urine analysis.LabUMat-with-UriSed全自动尿沉渣分析仪与iQ200全自动尿沉渣分析仪与手工尿液分析的比较。
Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2009 Jun;53(Pt 2):139-44. doi: 10.1042/BA20080188.
4
UriSed 3 and UX-2000 automated urine sediment analyzers vs manual microscopic method: A comparative performance analysis.UriSed 3和UX - 2000自动尿沉渣分析仪与手工显微镜检查法的比较性能分析
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Feb;32(2). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22249. Epub 2017 May 2.
5
Comparative Performance Analysis of Urised 3 and DIRUI FUS-200 Automated Urine Sediment Analyzers and Manual Microscopic Method.Urised 3与迪瑞FUS-200全自动尿沉渣分析仪及手工显微镜法的对比性能分析
Medeni Med J. 2019;34(3):244-251. doi: 10.5222/MMJ.2019.23169. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
6
Clinical laboratory urine analysis: comparison of the UriSed automated microscopic analyzer and the manual microscopy.临床实验室尿液分析:UriSed自动显微镜分析仪与手工显微镜检查的比较
Clin Lab. 2013;59(11-12):1297-303. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2013.121128.
7
Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting.自动化尿液分析:初步经验以及Iris iQ200尿液显微镜检查系统、Sysmex UF-100流式细胞仪与手工显微镜颗粒计数之间的比较
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(9):1251-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.503.
8
Performance of automated urine analyzers using flow cytometric and digital image-based technology in routine urinalysis.基于流式细胞术和数字图像技术的自动化尿液分析仪在常规尿液分析中的性能。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2019 Nov;79(7):468-474. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2019.1658894. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
Comparison of the Automated cobas u 701 Urine Microscopy and UF-1000i Flow Cytometry Systems and Manual Microscopy in the Examination of Urine Sediments.全自动 cobas u 701 尿液显微镜检查系统与 UF-1000i 流式细胞术系统及手工显微镜检查在尿沉渣检查中的比较
J Clin Lab Anal. 2016 Sep;30(5):663-71. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21919. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
Urinalysis: comparison between microscopic analysis and a new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment instrument.尿液分析:显微镜分析与一种新型基于显微镜图像的自动化尿沉渣仪器的比较。
Clin Lab. 2014;60(4):693-7. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2013.130725.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Anvajo Vet Fluidlab 1 urine sediment analyzer to manual microscopy and Idexx SediVue analysis for analysis of urine samples from cats and dogs.比较 Anvajo Vet Fluidlab 1 尿液沉渣分析仪与手动显微镜和 IDEXX SediVue 分析用于分析猫和狗的尿液样本。
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2022 Nov;34(6):944-954. doi: 10.1177/10406387221124157. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
2
Comparative Performance Analysis of Urised 3 and DIRUI FUS-200 Automated Urine Sediment Analyzers and Manual Microscopic Method.Urised 3与迪瑞FUS-200全自动尿沉渣分析仪及手工显微镜法的对比性能分析
Medeni Med J. 2019;34(3):244-251. doi: 10.5222/MMJ.2019.23169. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
3
Increased effectiveness of urinalysis testing via the integration of automated instrumentation, the lean management approach, and autoverification.通过整合自动化仪器、精益管理方法和自动验证,提高尿液分析检测的效果。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Jan;34(1):e23029. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23029. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
4
Comparing Two Automated Techniques for the Primary Screening-Out of Urine Culture.比较两种用于尿液培养初步筛选的自动化技术。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Dec 14;5:353. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00353. eCollection 2018.
5
Comparison of the performance of the IDEXX SediVue Dx® with manual microscopy for the detection of cells and 2 crystal types in canine and feline urine.IDEXX SediVue Dx®与手工显微镜检查在检测犬猫尿液中细胞和两种晶体类型方面的性能比较。
J Vet Intern Med. 2019 Jan;33(1):167-177. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15341. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
6
Progress in Automated Urinalysis.尿液分析自动化的进展。
Ann Lab Med. 2019 Jan;39(1):15-22. doi: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.1.15.
7
Evaluation of the analytical performances of Cobas 6500 and Sysmex UN series automated urinalysis systems with manual microscopic particle counting.评价 Cobas 6500 和 Sysmex UN 系列全自动尿液分析系统与人工显微镜粒子计数的分析性能。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018 Jun 15;28(2):020712. doi: 10.11613/BM.2018.020712.
8
Preanalytics of urine sediment examination: effect of relative centrifugal force, tube type, volume of sample and supernatant removal.尿沉渣检查的前分析:相对离心力、试管类型、样本量和上清液去除的影响。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2018 Feb 15;28(1):010707. doi: 10.11613/BM.2018.010707. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
9
The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis.自动尿液分析仪与手工显微镜检查用于尿液分析的比较:自动尿液分析仪与手工尿液分析
Pract Lab Med. 2016 Mar 11;5:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2016.03.002. eCollection 2016 Aug 1.
10
UriSed 3 and UX-2000 automated urine sediment analyzers vs manual microscopic method: A comparative performance analysis.UriSed 3和UX - 2000自动尿沉渣分析仪与手工显微镜检查法的比较性能分析
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Feb;32(2). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22249. Epub 2017 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of three automated systems for urine chemistry and sediment analysis in routine laboratory practice.常规实验室实践中三种尿液化学和沉渣分析自动化系统的比较。
Clin Lab. 2011;57(1-2):47-52.
2
New generation IQ-200 automated urine microscopy analyzer compared with KOVA cell chamber.新一代 IQ-200 自动化尿液显微镜分析系统与 KOVA 细胞计数室的比较。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2010;24(2):67-71. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20319.
3
[Evaluation of the performances of the iQ(®)200 ELITE automated urine microscopy analyser and comparison with manual microscopy method].[iQ(®)200 ELITE全自动尿液显微镜分析仪性能评估及与手工显微镜检查法的比较]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 2011 Oct;59(5):264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2009.10.006. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
4
Comparison of LabUMat-with-UriSed and iQ200 fully automatic urine sediment analysers with manual urine analysis.LabUMat-with-UriSed全自动尿沉渣分析仪与iQ200全自动尿沉渣分析仪与手工尿液分析的比较。
Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2009 Jun;53(Pt 2):139-44. doi: 10.1042/BA20080188.
5
Clinical laboratory automated urinalysis: comparison among automated microscopy, flow cytometry, two test strips analyzers, and manual microscopic examination of the urine sediments.临床实验室自动化尿液分析:自动显微镜检查、流式细胞术、两种试纸分析仪与尿液沉渣手工显微镜检查之间的比较
J Clin Lab Anal. 2008;22(4):262-70. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20257.
6
Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting.自动化尿液分析:初步经验以及Iris iQ200尿液显微镜检查系统、Sysmex UF-100流式细胞仪与手工显微镜颗粒计数之间的比较
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(9):1251-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.503.
7
Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy.尿沉渣检查:自动尿液分析系统与手工显微镜检查的比较
Clin Chim Acta. 2007 Sep;384(1-2):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 May 26.
8
[Hematuria and acanthocyturia in patients with diabetes].糖尿病患者的血尿和棘形红细胞尿
Rinsho Byori. 2005 Nov;53(11):993-8.
9
Urinalysis: a comprehensive review.尿液分析:全面综述。
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Mar 15;71(6):1153-62.
10
Safely reducing manual urine microscopy analyses by combining urine flow cytometer and strip results.通过结合尿流式细胞仪和试纸条结果安全减少手工尿显微镜分析
Am J Clin Pathol. 2001 Dec;116(6):872-8. doi: 10.1309/GRT7-Q6WP-VGWE-0YUM.