• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项系统元主题综合分析,旨在研究妇女在分娩和水中分娩期间进行水中浸泡后的观点和体验。

A systematic meta-thematic synthesis to examine the views and experiences of women following water immersion during labour and waterbirth.

机构信息

Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.

University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jul;77(7):2942-2956. doi: 10.1111/jan.14720. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1111/jan.14720
PMID:33464640
Abstract

AIMS

To gather, quality assess, synthesize and interpret the views, feeling, and experiences of women who used water immersion during labour and/or birth.

DESIGN

A systematic meta-thematic synthesis and GRADE-CERQual.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, CINHAL, PsychINFO, AMED, EMBASE (MIDIRS only), LILACS, AJOL. Additional searches were carried out using Ethos (thesis database), cross-referencing against Google Scholar and citation chasing. Searches were carried out in August 2019, updated February 2020.

METHODS

Studies that met the selection criteria were appraised for quality. Data were extracted from the studies using meta-thematic analytical techniques; coding, descriptive findings, and analytical findings. The descriptive findings were subjected to confidence assessments using GRADE-CERQual.

RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine key statements of findings were generated - one had high confidence, three moderate, three low and one very low confidence in the findings. The analytical findings generated three main themes: Liberation and Self-Emancipation, Synergy, transcendence and demarcation and Transformative birth and beyond. Overall, women experienced warm water immersion during labour and/or birth positively. Both the water and pool itself, facilitated women's physical and psychological needs during labour and/or birth, including offering effective analgesia. Our findings indicated that birthing pools are versatile tools that provide for a space that women can adapt and influence to best suit their individual needs.

CONCLUSION

Women who used warm water immersion for labour and/or birth describe liberating and transformative experiences of welcoming their babies into the world. They were empowered, liberated, and satisfied. We recommend maternity professionals and services offer water immersion as a standard method of pain relief during labour/birth.

IMPACT

Understanding women's experiences of labour and birth will inform future clinical practice. Midwives are optimally positioned to enhance women's access to water immersion. These findings have implications for education, guideline, and policy development as well as clinical practice.

摘要

目的

收集、评估质量、综合和解释使用分娩期间浸水的妇女的观点、感受和经验。

设计

系统的元主题综合和 GRADE-CERQual。

数据来源

我们检索了 MEDLINE、CINHAL、PsychINFO、AMED、EMBASE(仅 MIDIRS)、LILACS、AJOL。还使用 Ethos(论文数据库)进行了额外的搜索,与 Google Scholar 交叉引用并进行引文追踪。搜索于 2019 年 8 月进行,2020 年 2 月更新。

方法

符合选择标准的研究进行了质量评估。使用元主题分析技术从研究中提取数据;编码、描述性发现和分析性发现。使用 GRADE-CERQual 对描述性发现进行置信度评估。

结果

有 7 项研究符合纳入标准。生成了 9 个关键发现陈述 - 一个具有高度置信度,三个具有中度置信度,三个具有低度置信度,一个具有非常低度置信度。分析结果生成了三个主题:解放和自我解放、协同作用、超越和划分以及变革性分娩和超越。总体而言,女性对分娩期间的温水浸浴持积极态度。水和水池本身在分娩期间满足了女性的身体和心理需求,包括提供有效的镇痛。我们的研究结果表明,分娩池是多功能工具,可以提供一个空间,让女性可以适应和影响,以最好地满足她们的个人需求。

结论

使用温水浸浴分娩的女性描述了迎接婴儿进入世界的解放和变革性体验。她们被赋予权力、解放和满足。我们建议产科专业人员和服务提供温水浸浴作为分娩时缓解疼痛的标准方法。

影响

了解女性的分娩经历将为未来的临床实践提供信息。助产士最有能力增强女性获得温水浸浴的机会。这些发现对教育、指南和政策制定以及临床实践都有影响。

相似文献

1
A systematic meta-thematic synthesis to examine the views and experiences of women following water immersion during labour and waterbirth.一项系统元主题综合分析,旨在研究妇女在分娩和水中分娩期间进行水中浸泡后的观点和体验。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jul;77(7):2942-2956. doi: 10.1111/jan.14720. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth.系统回顾和荟萃分析,以检查分娩期间和水中分娩时浸入水中的产时干预措施以及母婴结局。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 5;12(7):e056517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056517.
3
Midwives' experience of their education, knowledge and practice around immersion in water for labour or birth.助产士在水中分娩或生产方面的教育、知识和实践经验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1823-0.
4
Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review.女性在分娩过程中使用药物和非药物缓解疼痛方法的体验:一项定性系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2019 May 30;16(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0735-4.
5
Women's experiences of water immersion during labour and childbirth in a hospital setting in Ireland: A qualitative study.爱尔兰医院环境中女性分娩时水浸体验的质性研究
Midwifery. 2022 May;108:103278. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103278. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
6
Women and waterbirth: A systematic meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.女性与水中分娩:定性研究的系统荟萃分析。
Women Birth. 2020 Nov;33(6):566-573. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
7
Factors influencing water immersion during labour: qualitative case studies of six maternity units in the United Kingdom.影响分娩时浸水的因素:英国六家产科单位的定性案例研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):719. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03416-7.
8
Sense of coherence as facilitated by water immersion during labour and birth: A concept analysis and synthesis.分娩过程中水中浸泡对机体的感知:概念分析与综合。
Midwifery. 2023 Nov;126:103824. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103824. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
9
Experiences of water immersion during childbirth: a qualitative thematic synthesis.分娩时水中浸泡的体验:定性主题综合分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 29;23(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05690-7.
10
Mixed-methods systematic review: Childbearing women's views, experiences, and decision-making related to epidural analgesia in labour.混合方法系统评价:分娩妇女对产程中硬膜外镇痛的看法、经验和决策。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Dec;76(12):3273-3292. doi: 10.1111/jan.14555. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The depth structure of a good birth: reconfiguring the environment in a high-risk labour ward birth and creating sanctuary behind a screen.良好分娩的深度结构:在高危产房分娩中重新构建环境并在屏风后营造庇护所。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Aug 7;6:1610077. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1610077. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of Water Immersion Versus Epidural as Analgesic Methods during Labor among Low-Risk Women: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.低风险女性分娩期间水浸与硬膜外麻醉作为镇痛方法的效果:一项10年回顾性队列研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Sep 25;12(19):1919. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191919.
3
Introducing waterbirth in a university hospital setting in Sweden: A qualitative study of midwives' experiences.
在瑞典一家大学医院引入水中分娩:一项关于助产士经验的定性研究。
Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Jun 3;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/188193. eCollection 2024.
4
Birth "outside of guidance"-An exploration of a Birth Choices Clinic in the United Kingdom.“在指导之外”的分娩——对英国一家分娩选择诊所的探索
Birth. 2025 Mar;52(1):46-54. doi: 10.1111/birt.12827. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Understanding the barriers and facilitators related to birthing pool use from organisational and multi-professional perspectives: a mixed-methods systematic review.从组织和多专业角度理解与分娩池使用相关的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2023 Oct 4;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01690-0.
6
Experiences of water immersion during childbirth: a qualitative thematic synthesis.分娩时水中浸泡的体验:定性主题综合分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 29;23(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05690-7.
7
The views and perceptions of water immersion for labor and birth from women who had birthed in Australia but had not used the option.对于在澳大利亚分娩但未选择水中分娩的女性,她们对水中分娩的看法和认知。
Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Aug 4;6:54. doi: 10.18332/ejm/150355. eCollection 2022.
8
Factors Associated With Normal Physiologic Birth for Women Who Labor In Water: A Secondary Analysis of A Prospective Observational Study.与水中分娩的女性正常生理分娩相关的因素:一项前瞻性观察研究的二次分析。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Jan;67(1):13-20. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13315. Epub 2022 Jan 14.