• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)中不同光学区对中度近视患者早期视觉质量的比较。

Comparison of early visual quality in patients with moderate myopia using different optical zones in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

作者信息

Wu Yan, Huang Zhenping

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Jinling Hospital, No.305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01798-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12886-020-01798-y
PMID:33468076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7814624/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The early visual qualities of patients with moderate myopia were evaluated after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using different optical zones.

METHODS

In this retrospective case study, 27 cases (51 eyes) were selected, including 10 cases in Group A (19 eyes), 6.6-6.8 mm in the optical zone, 10 cases in Group B (19 eyes), 6.4-6.5 mm in the optical zone, and 7 cases in Group C (13 eyes),6.1-6.3 mm in the optical zone. The following items were examined preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively: uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical, cylinder, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal mean curvature (CMC), total ocular aberrations (TA), total low order aberrations (tLOAs), defocus, astigmatism and total high order aberrations (tHOAs), spherical, coma, trefoil, modulation transfer function (MTF), MTF, SR, objective scatter index (OSI), point scatter function at 50 and 10% (PSF50%, PSF10%), and contrast visual acuity of 100, 20, and 9% (VA100%, VA20%, and VA9%). We compared the three groups by Kruskal-Wallis test. Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for each group before and 1 month after surgeries. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in UCVA, BCVA, CCT, cylinder, and CMC in three groups preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively (P> 0.05). Comparison of the aberrations of the three groups showed statistically significant difference only in TA, tLOA, defocus, astigmatism and SA preoperatively, and trefoil 1 month postoperatively(P< 0.05). The postoperative TA, tLOAs, defocus, astigmatism and trefoil of the three groups were lower than those before surgeries (P< 0.05). The postoperative tHOAs of Group B and C was lower than those before surgeries (P< 0.05). The MTF results showed that before surgeries, there were significant differences in three groups (P< 0.05) in spatial frequencies 515 cycles per degree (cpd), and no differences in 2030 cpd(P> 0.05), while no difference were observed in all spatial frequencies postoperatively (P> 0.05). Comparing the preoperative and postoperative MTF values for each group, the results showed that there was a significant difference in Group C at 5~20 cpd after surgeries(P< 0.05). There was no significant difference in MTF, SR, OSI, PSF50%, PSF10%, VA100%, VA20%, and VA9% in the three groups preoperatively (P> 0.05). One month after surgeries, higher VA9% values were measured for Group C compared to Group A and B (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in each group before and after surgeries (P> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SMILE could improve the visual qualities of patients with moderate myopia. Reducing the surgical optical zone will only affect night vision slightly.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b81/7814624/38e02da97bdb/12886_2020_1798_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b81/7814624/3e142cdb00b3/12886_2020_1798_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b81/7814624/5c70ab994c13/12886_2020_1798_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b81/7814624/5cc64ee1127d/12886_2020_1798_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b81/7814624/38e02da97bdb/12886_2020_1798_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b81/7814624/3e142cdb00b3/12886_2020_1798_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b81/7814624/5c70ab994c13/12886_2020_1798_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b81/7814624/5cc64ee1127d/12886_2020_1798_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b81/7814624/38e02da97bdb/12886_2020_1798_Fig4_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

采用不同光学区的小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)后,对中度近视患者的早期视觉质量进行评估。

方法

在这项回顾性病例研究中,选取27例(51只眼),其中A组10例(19只眼),光学区为6.6 - 6.8毫米;B组10例(19只眼),光学区为6.4 - 6.5毫米;C组7例(13只眼),光学区为6.1 - 6.3毫米。术前及术后1个月检查以下项目:裸眼视力(UCVA)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、球镜、柱镜、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、角膜平均曲率(CMC)、总眼像差(TA)、总低阶像差(tLOAs)、离焦、散光和总高阶像差(tHOAs)、球差、彗差、三叶草像差、调制传递函数(MTF)、SR、客观散射指数(OSI)、50%和10%处的点扩散函数(PSF50%,PSF10%)以及100%、20%和9%的对比视力(VA100%,VA20%,VA9%)。采用Kruskal - Wallis检验对三组进行比较。每组手术前后采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

三组术前及术后1个月的UCVA、BCVA、CCT、柱镜和CMC无显著差异(P > 0.05)。三组像差比较显示,术前仅TA、tLOA、离焦、散光和球差有统计学显著差异,术后1个月三叶草像差有统计学显著差异(P < 0.05)。三组术后的TA、tLOAs、离焦、散光和三叶草像差低于手术前(P < 0.05)。B组和C组术后的tHOAs低于手术前(P < 0.05)。MTF结果显示,术前三组在每度5~15周/度(cpd)的空间频率上有显著差异(P <

相似文献

1
Comparison of early visual quality in patients with moderate myopia using different optical zones in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)中不同光学区对中度近视患者早期视觉质量的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01798-y.
2
Early visual outcomes and optical quality after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction of over -10 dioptres.超高度近视的飞秒激光小切口角膜微透镜取出术的早期视觉效果和光学质量。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 May;96(3):e341-e346. doi: 10.1111/aos.13609. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
3
Comparison of visual quality after SMILE correction of low-to-moderate myopia in different optical zones.不同光学区 SMILE 矫正低中度近视术后视觉质量比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;43(10):3623-3632. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02771-6. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
4
Association of myopia and astigmatism with postoperative ocular high order aberration after small incision lenticule extraction.小切口微透镜取出术后近视和散光与高阶像差的关系。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 May 13;24(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03475-w.
5
Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer: a one-year retrospective study.SMILE 和 FS-LASIK 治疗高度近视术后的光学质量比较:OQAS 和 iTrace 分析仪的一年回顾性研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug 2;21(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02048-5.
6
[Comparison of the visual quality at 1 year following femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, wavefront-guided femtosecond LASIK and small incision lenticule extraction for myopia and astigmatism].[飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术、波前引导飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术和小切口基质透镜切除术治疗近视及散光后1年视觉质量的比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 11;56(2):118-125. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2020.02.007.
7
[Two millimeter micro incision lenticule extraction surgery with minimal invasion: a preliminary clinical report].[两毫米微小切口透镜切除术的微创性:初步临床报告]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;50(9):671-80.
8
SMILE With Low Energy Levels: Assessment of Early Visual and Optical Quality Recovery.低能量水平下的 SMILE:早期视觉和光学质量恢复的评估。
J Refract Surg. 2019 May 1;35(5):285-293. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190416-01.
9
Effects of varying illumination on ocular aberrations and aberration compensation before and after small incision Lenticule extraction: a prospective cohort study.不同光照对小切口微透镜取出术前后眼像差和像差补偿的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02084-1.
10
Vector analysis of astigmatic correction after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted LASIK for low to moderate myopic astigmatism.小切口透镜切除术和飞秒辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗中低度近视散光后散光矫正的矢量分析
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;100(4):553-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307238. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of dynamic changes in the effective optical zone in Low-Moderate and high myopia with a novel method and visual outcomes after SMILE surgery: A 6-Month clinical study.采用新方法比较低度、中度和高度近视患者SMILE手术后有效光学区的动态变化及视觉效果:一项6个月的临床研究
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Aug 9;40(1):331. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04586-6.
2
Impact of Dry Eye Disease on the Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.干眼疾病对小切口透镜切除术术后未矫正远视力的影响。
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 25;12(19):6179. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196179.
3
Intensive topical steroid regimen for enhanced very early recovery after small incision lenticule extraction.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Astigmatism, Densitometry, and Aberrations After SMILE for Low to High Myopic Astigmatism: A 12-Month Prospective Study.低至高度近视散光患者SMILE术后散光、密度测量及像差的变化:一项为期12个月的前瞻性研究
J Refract Surg. 2017 Jan 1;33(1):11-17. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20161006-04.
2
[Update the concepts on visual correction and enhance the visual quality after corneal refractive surgery].[更新视觉矫正理念并提高角膜屈光手术后的视觉质量]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jan;52(1):10-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2016.01.005.
3
Small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): outcomes of 722 eyes treated for myopia and myopic astigmatism.
小切口微透镜提取术后强化超早期恢复的强化局部皮质类固醇方案。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;43(11):4097-4103. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02827-7. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
4
Subjective patient-reported visual quality after small-incision lenticule extraction and its correlation to the objective one.小切口角膜透镜取出术后患者主观视觉质量及其与客观质量的相关性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;43(11):3935-3942. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02794-z. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
5
The effects of programmed optical zones on achieved corneal refractive power with myopic astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a vector analysis.SMILE 术后近视性散光的程序化光学区对角膜屈光力的影响:向量分析。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;43(7):2493-2501. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02649-7. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
6
Applying Information Gain to Explore Factors Affecting Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.应用信息增益探索影响小切口透镜切除术的因素:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 3;9:837092. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.837092. eCollection 2022.
7
Clinical outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for high myopia: A meta-analysis.小切口透镜切除术与飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗高度近视的临床疗效比较:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0242059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242059. eCollection 2021.
微小切口透镜切除术(SMILE):722只近视和近视散光眼的治疗效果
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;254(2):399-405. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3226-5. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
4
Three-Year Results of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for High Myopia: Refractive Outcomes and Aberrations.高度近视小切口透镜切除术的三年结果:屈光结果与像差
J Refract Surg. 2015 Nov;31(11):719-24. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150923-11. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
5
Dry eye disease after refractive surgery: comparative outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus LASIK.屈光手术后干眼:微切口晶状体提取术与 LASIK 的对比结果。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):669-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
6
Outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low myopia.低度近视患者小切口透镜切除术(SMILE)的效果
J Refract Surg. 2014 Dec;30(12):812-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20141113-07.
7
Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study.小切口微透镜取出术的疗效、可预测性和安全性:6 个月前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct 3;14:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-117.
8
Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism.飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 联合 Smile 手术治疗近视或近视散光患者的视力和屈光效果比较。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;30(9):590-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140814-02.
9
Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction.飞秒透镜切除术和小切口透镜切除术术后视力与高阶像差的比较。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014 Aug;37(4):292-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
10
Safety and complications of more than 1500 small-incision lenticule extraction procedures.超过 1500 例小切口微透镜提取手术的安全性和并发症。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Apr;121(4):822-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Dec 21.