• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择、质量与患者体验:来自芬兰物理治疗服务的证据。

Choice, quality and patients' experience: evidence from a Finnish physiotherapy service.

机构信息

Research Department, Social Insurance Institution of Finland, P.O. Box 450, 00056, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Health Econ Manag. 2021 Jun;21(2):229-245. doi: 10.1007/s10754-020-09293-z. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10754-020-09293-z
PMID:33469804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8192355/
Abstract

We study the relationship between patient choices and provider quality in a rehabilitation service for disabled patients who receive the service frequently but do not have access to quality information. Previous research has found a positive relationship between patient choices and provider quality in health services that patients typically do not have previous experience or use frequently. We contribute by examining choices of new patients and experienced patients who were either forced to switch or actively switched their provider. In the analysis, we combine register data on patients' choices and switches with provider quality data from a competitive bidding, and estimate conditional logit choice models. The results show that all patients prefer high-quality providers within short distances. We find that the willingness to travel for quality is highest among new patients and active switchers. These results suggest that new patients and active switchers compare different alternatives more thoroughly, whereas forced switchers choose their new provider in limited time leading into poorer choices.

摘要

我们研究了在一个为残疾患者提供的康复服务中,患者选择与服务质量之间的关系。这些患者经常接受服务,但无法获得质量信息。之前的研究发现,在患者通常没有先前经验或不经常使用的医疗服务中,患者选择与服务质量之间存在正相关关系。我们通过检查新患者和有经验的患者的选择来做出贡献,这些患者要么被迫更换,要么主动更换了他们的服务提供商。在分析中,我们将患者选择和转换的登记数据与竞争招标的服务质量数据相结合,并估计条件逻辑选择模型。结果表明,所有患者都更喜欢短距离内的高质量服务提供商。我们发现,新患者和主动转换者对高质量服务的出行意愿最高。这些结果表明,新患者和主动转换者更彻底地比较了不同的选择,而被迫转换者在有限的时间内选择他们的新提供商,导致选择较差。

相似文献

1
Choice, quality and patients' experience: evidence from a Finnish physiotherapy service.选择、质量与患者体验:来自芬兰物理治疗服务的证据。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2021 Jun;21(2):229-245. doi: 10.1007/s10754-020-09293-z. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Does Competition Have an Effect on Price and Quality in Physiotherapy?物理治疗中的竞争对价格和质量有影响吗?
Health Econ. 2017 Oct;26(10):1278-1290. doi: 10.1002/hec.3402. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Patient choice and provider competition - Quality enhancing drivers in primary care?患者选择和提供者竞争 - 初级保健中的质量提升驱动因素?
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.042. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
4
What patients think about choice in healthcare? A study on primary care services in Finland.患者如何看待医疗保健中的选择?芬兰初级保健服务的一项研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jun;46(4):463-470. doi: 10.1177/1403494817731488. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
5
Can high quality overcome consumer resistance to restricted provider access? Evidence from a health plan choice experiment.高质量能否克服消费者对受限医疗服务提供者选择的抵触情绪?来自一项健康计划选择实验的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;37(3):551-71. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00037.
6
Competition and quality in a physiotherapy market with fixed prices.固定价格的物理治疗市场中的竞争与质量。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Jan;18(1):97-117. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0792-3. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
Low risk, high reward? Repeated competitive biddings with multiple winners in health care.低风险,高回报?医疗领域的多次重复竞标和多个赢家。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jun;21(4):483-500. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01143-1. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
8
The development of satisfaction with service-related choices for disabled young people with degenerative conditions: evidence from parents' accounts.服务相关选择对残疾青少年满意度的发展:来自父母描述的证据。
Health Soc Care Community. 2012 Jul;20(4):388-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01042.x. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
9
"": access to HIV information and services among persons with disabilities in Ghana, Uganda, and Zambia."": 加纳、乌干达和赞比亚残疾人获取艾滋病毒信息和服务的情况。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Feb;42(3):335-348. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1498138. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
10
How do people choose to be informed? A survey of the information searched for in the choice of primary care provider in Sweden.人们如何选择获取信息?对瑞典选择初级保健提供者时所搜索信息的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 7;21(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06380-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Doctors' Preferences in the Selection of Patients in Online Medical Consultations: An Empirical Study with Doctor-Patient Consultation Data.在线医疗咨询中医师对患者的选择偏好:基于医患咨询数据的实证研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 30;10(8):1435. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081435.
2
Patient preferences and attitudes towards first choice medical services in Shenzhen, China: a cross-sectional study.中国深圳患者对首选医疗服务的偏好和态度:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e057280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057280.
3
Competition and efficiency in repeated procurements: Lessons from the Finnish rehabilitation markets.

本文引用的文献

1
Low risk, high reward? Repeated competitive biddings with multiple winners in health care.低风险,高回报?医疗领域的多次重复竞标和多个赢家。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jun;21(4):483-500. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01143-1. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
2
Free to Choose? Reform, Choice, and Consideration Sets in the English National Health Service.自由选择?英国国民医疗服务体系中的改革、选择与考量集
Am Econ Rev. 2016 Nov;106(11):3521-57. doi: 10.1257/aer.20121532.
3
Patient choice modelling: how do patients choose their hospitals?患者选择模型:患者如何选择他们的医院?
重复采购中的竞争与效率:来自芬兰康复市场的经验教训。
Health Econ. 2022 May;31(5):820-835. doi: 10.1002/hec.4485. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Jun;21(2):259-268. doi: 10.1007/s10729-017-9399-1. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
4
Does Quality Affect Patients' Choice of Doctor? Evidence from England.医疗质量会影响患者对医生的选择吗?来自英国的证据。
Econ J (London). 2017 Mar;127(600):445-494. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12282. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
5
Location, quality and choice of hospital: Evidence from England 2002-2013.医院的地理位置、质量与选择:来自2002年至2013年英国的证据
Reg Sci Urban Econ. 2016 Sep;60:112-124. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.07.001.
6
Choice of hospital: Which type of quality matters?医院的选择:哪种质量至关重要?
J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:230-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
7
Competition among health care providers: helpful or harmful?医疗服务提供者之间的竞争:有益还是有害?
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Apr;17(3):229-33. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0736-3.
8
Patient choice, mobility and competition among health care providers.患者选择、就医便利性以及医疗服务提供者之间的竞争。
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 2014;12:1-26. doi: 10.1007/978-88-470-5480-6_1.
9
The impact of competition on quality and prices in the English care homes market.竞争对英国养老院市场质量和价格的影响。
J Health Econ. 2014 Mar;34(100):73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
10
Patient hospital choice for hip replacement: empirical evidence from the Netherlands.髋关节置换患者的医院选择:来自荷兰的实证证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Dec;15(9):927-36. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0535-7. Epub 2013 Oct 25.