Suppr超能文献

重启 TICrH:创伤性颅内出血后直接口服抗凝剂重启时间间隔的适应性随机试验。

Restart TICrH: An Adaptive Randomized Trial of Time Intervals to Restart Direct Oral Anticoagulants after Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.

机构信息

Seton Dell Medical School Stroke Institute, Austin, Texas, USA.

Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2021 Jun 1;38(13):1791-1798. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7535. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

Abstract

Anticoagulants prevent thrombosis and death in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism (VTE) but also increase bleeding risk. The benefit/risk ratio favors anticoagulation in most of these patients. However, some will have a bleeding complication, such as the common trip-and-fall brain injury in elderly patients that results in traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Clinicians must then make the difficult decision about when to restart the anticoagulant. Restarting too early risks making the bleeding worse. Restarting too late risks thrombotic events such as ischemic stroke and VTE, the indications for anticoagulation in the first place. There are more data on restarting patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage, which is very different than traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage increases the risk of rebleeding because intrinsic vascular changes are widespread and irreversible. In contrast, traumatic cases are caused by a blow to the head, usually an isolated event portending less future risk. Clinicians generally agree that anticoagulation should be restarted but disagree about when. This uncertainty leads to long restart delays causing a large, potentially preventable burden of strokes and VTE, which has been unaddressed because of the absence of high quality evidence. Restart Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (the "r" distinguished intracranial from intracerebral) (TICrH) is a prospective randomized open label blinded end-point response-adaptive clinical trial that will evaluate the impact of delays to restarting direct oral anticoagulation (1, 2, or 4 weeks) on the composite of thrombotic events and bleeding in patients presenting after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.

摘要

抗凝剂可预防房颤和静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者的血栓形成和死亡,但也会增加出血风险。在大多数此类患者中,抗凝治疗的获益/风险比是有利的。然而,有些患者会出现出血并发症,例如老年患者常见的绊倒和摔倒导致的创伤性颅内出血。临床医生必须做出艰难的决定,何时重新开始抗凝治疗。过早重新开始可能会使出血恶化。太晚重新开始则会增加血栓形成事件的风险,如缺血性中风和 VTE,这些都是抗凝治疗的最初适应证。对于自发性颅内出血(与创伤性颅内出血不同),有更多关于重新开始治疗的相关数据。自发性颅内出血会增加再出血的风险,因为内在血管变化广泛且不可逆转。相比之下,创伤性病例是由头部受到打击引起的,通常是预示未来风险较低的孤立事件。临床医生普遍认为应该重新开始抗凝治疗,但对于何时开始存在分歧。这种不确定性导致重新开始治疗的延迟时间延长,从而导致大量潜在可预防的中风和 VTE 负担,由于缺乏高质量证据,这些问题尚未得到解决。重新开始创伤性颅内出血(r 用于区分颅内和脑内)(TICrH)是一项前瞻性随机开放标签盲终点反应适应性临床试验,旨在评估延迟重新开始直接口服抗凝剂(1、2 或 4 周)对创伤性颅内出血后患者的血栓形成事件和出血复合事件的影响。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Alternative clinical trial designs.替代性临床试验设计。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 Feb 4;5(1):e000420. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000420. eCollection 2020.
5
Use of Anticoagulation Agents After Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.创伤性颅内出血后抗凝剂的使用
World Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;123:e25-e30. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.173. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验