• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁想要改变,以及如何改变?论人格改变目标的特质特异性。

Who wants to change and how? On the trait-specificity of personality change goals.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Nov;121(5):1112-1139. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000304. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1037/pspp0000304
PMID:33475400
Abstract

The study of volitional personality change has received increasing attention in recent years, suggesting that individuals want to change for the better particularly on those socially desirable characteristics that they lack. However, individuals do not want to change for the better on all (even socially desirable) traits alike. In a meta-analytic summary of evidence on the Big Five, we demonstrate that individuals' trait levels are only negatively related to their change goals for Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Conscientiousness, but not for Agreeableness and Openness to Experience. In three studies, two of them preregistered, we replicated these meta-analytic findings using the HEXACO model, showing negative relations between trait levels and change goals for all dimensions, except Honesty-Humility and Openness to Experience. Strikingly, however, these trait-specific differences in correlations of trait levels and change goals disappeared once providing individuals with personality feedback before assessing their change goals, suggesting that individuals may generally want to change for the better once having sufficient self-knowledge. Nonetheless, the mechanisms driving this desire differ between traits: Whereas the perceived social desirability of individuals' trait levels accounted for change goals on most HEXACO dimensions, it did not account for change goals on Honesty-Humility and Openness to Experience. By implication, a desire to have socially desirable characteristics that one lacks can explain change goals for some traits, but not for those traits underlying individual differences in values. As an aside, the studies offer vital information on personality development of the HEXACO dimensions over time, spanning 10 and 3.5 years, respectively. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

近年来,意志人格改变的研究受到了越来越多的关注,这表明个体特别希望改善那些他们缺乏的社会期望特征。然而,个体并不希望在所有(甚至是社会期望的)特征上都变得更好。在对大五人格的证据进行元分析总结时,我们证明个体的特质水平仅与神经质、外向性和尽责性的改变目标呈负相关,而与宜人性和经验开放性无关。在三项研究中,其中两项是预先注册的,我们使用 HEXACO 模型复制了这些元分析发现,显示特质水平与改变目标之间存在负相关,除了诚实-谦逊和经验开放性维度。然而,令人惊讶的是,一旦在评估改变目标之前为个体提供人格反馈,这些特质水平和改变目标之间的相关差异就会消失,这表明个体一旦有了足够的自我认识,通常就会希望变得更好。尽管如此,驱动这种愿望的机制在不同特质之间存在差异:虽然个体特质水平的感知社会期望度可以解释大多数 HEXACO 维度上的改变目标,但它并不能解释诚实-谦逊和经验开放性维度上的改变目标。这意味着,拥有自己缺乏的社会期望特征的愿望可以解释某些特质的改变目标,但不能解释那些与价值观个体差异相关的特质的改变目标。此外,这些研究提供了关于 HEXACO 维度随时间推移的人格发展的重要信息,分别跨越了 10 年和 3.5 年。

相似文献

1
Who wants to change and how? On the trait-specificity of personality change goals.谁想要改变,以及如何改变?论人格改变目标的特质特异性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Nov;121(5):1112-1139. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000304. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Trait-specificity versus global positivity: A critical test of alternative sources of assumed similarity in personality judgments.特质特异性与整体积极性:人格判断中假定相似性的替代来源的批判性检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;124(4):828-847. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000420. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
3
HEXACO personality correlates of adolescents' involvement in bullying situations.青少年卷入欺凌情境的 HEXACO 人格相关因素。
Aggress Behav. 2021 May;47(3):320-331. doi: 10.1002/ab.21947. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Development and initial validation of the HEXACO-Triarchic scales.人格特质的六维结构模型(HEXACO)三因素量表的编制与初步验证。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Dec;30(12):1560-1566. doi: 10.1037/pas0000609. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
5
Using the HEXACO to explain the structure of borderline and psychopathic personality traits.用 HEXACO 模型解释边缘型和精神病态人格特质的结构。
Personal Ment Health. 2023 Nov;17(4):352-362. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1584. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
6
Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis.人格对心理和主观幸福感的预测:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;146(4):279-323. doi: 10.1037/bul0000226. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
7
The HEXACO Personality Space Before and After Re-Rotation to Approximate the Big Five Dimensions.重新旋转以近似大五人格维度前后的HEXACO人格空间。
J Pers Assess. 2024 Mar-Apr;106(2):145-155. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2023.2229427. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
8
The Nomological Net of the HEXACO Model of Personality: A Large-Scale Meta-Analytic Investigation.人格 HEXACO 模型的法则网络:一项大规模元分析研究。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):723-760. doi: 10.1177/1745691619895036. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
Examining Equity Sensitivity: An Investigation Using the Big Five and HEXACO Models of Personality.审视公平敏感性:一项基于大五人格模型和HEXACO人格模型的调查
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 8;6:2000. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02000. eCollection 2015.
10
Rethinking trait conceptions of social desirability scales: impression management as an expression of honesty-humility.重新思考社会赞许性量表的特质概念:将印象管理视为诚实谦逊的一种表现
Assessment. 2014 Jun;21(3):286-99. doi: 10.1177/1073191113504619. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of volitional personality change research.一项关于意志性人格改变研究的系统综述。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Nov 30;2(1):115. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00167-5.
2
Disentangling the within- and between-person effects of personality on income for men and women.解析男性和女性个性对收入的个体内效应和个体间效应。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 May 22;11(5):231750. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231750. eCollection 2024 May.
3
A Novel Smartphone-Based Intervention Aimed at Increasing Future Orientation via the Future Self: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Prototype Application.
基于智能手机的新型干预手段,通过未来自我增加未来取向:原型应用的试点随机对照试验。
Prev Sci. 2024 Feb;25(2):392-405. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01609-y. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
4
A future orientation intervention delivered through a smartphone application and virtual reality: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一种通过智能手机应用程序和虚拟现实提供的未来导向干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Dec 20;10(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-01025-x.
5
Stimulating a future-oriented mindset and goal attainment through a smartphone-based intervention: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.通过基于智能手机的干预激发面向未来的思维方式和目标达成:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Internet Interv. 2022 Feb 15;27:100509. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100509. eCollection 2022 Mar.