• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物理环境与社会环境:哪些老龄化友好因素能预测男性和女性的主观幸福感?

Physical Environment vs. Social Environment: What Factors of Age-Friendliness Predict Subjective Well-Being in Men and Women?

机构信息

Matia Institute of Gerontology, C/ Orense 6, 28020 Madrid, Spain.

Andalusian School of Public Health, Cuesta del Observatorio, 4, 18011 Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 19;18(2):798. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020798.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18020798
PMID:33477788
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7832315/
Abstract

"Age-Friendly Cities and Communities" is an initiative launched by the WHO in 2007 that has spread to more than 1000 cities and communities around the world. This initiative is based on an integrated physical and social environment for older people, and a model of participatory, collaborative governance. An enabling social environment setting is just as important as material conditions in determining well-being in later life. The objective of this study is to analyze the interaction between age-friendliness (physical and social) and subjective well-being in women and men aged 55 and over in the Basque Country. The methodology was based on a survey of a representative sample ( = 2469 individuals). In order to know the predictive power of age-friendliness over subjective well-being, linear regression models separated by gender were constructed. The predictive models of age-friendliness are composed by different variables for men and women. In both cases, the physical environment variables do not remain in the final model. Among the predictors of well-being in men, the coexistence stands out as a safety and support network. In women, the neighborhood has proved to be a very important resource. The conclusions of this study contribute to literature and interventions promoting more effective strategies that enhance older people well-being, considering the gender perspective.

摘要

“建设适宜老年人居住的城市和社区”是世卫组织于 2007 年发起的一项倡议,该倡议已经传播到全球 1000 多个城市和社区。该倡议基于为老年人提供综合的物质和社会环境,以及参与式、协作式的治理模式。营造有利的社会环境与物质条件一样,对晚年的幸福感至关重要。本研究旨在分析巴斯克地区 55 岁及以上的女性和男性的宜居性(物质和社会)与主观幸福感之间的相互作用。该方法基于对具有代表性的样本(=2469 人)的调查。为了了解宜居性对主观幸福感的预测能力,分别按性别构建了线性回归模型。男女预测模型由不同的变量组成。在这两种情况下,物质环境变量都不会保留在最终模型中。在男性幸福感的预测因素中,共存是安全和支持网络的体现。在女性中,邻里关系被证明是一个非常重要的资源。本研究的结论有助于文献和干预措施的发展,这些文献和干预措施从性别视角出发,促进了增强老年人幸福感的更有效策略。

相似文献

1
Physical Environment vs. Social Environment: What Factors of Age-Friendliness Predict Subjective Well-Being in Men and Women?物理环境与社会环境:哪些老龄化友好因素能预测男性和女性的主观幸福感?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 19;18(2):798. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020798.
2
Examining the relationship between communities' 'age-friendliness' and life satisfaction and self-perceived health in rural Manitoba, Canada.研究加拿大曼尼托巴省农村地区社区的“对老年人友好程度”与生活满意度及自我认知健康之间的关系。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14:2594. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
3
Friendly Residential Environments and Subjective Well-Being in Older People with and without Help Needs.有和没有帮助需求的老年人的友好居住环境与主观幸福感。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;19(23):15832. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315832.
4
Understanding Aging in Place: Home and Community Features, Perceived Age-Friendliness of Community, and Intention Toward Aging in Place.理解就地养老:家庭和社区特征、社区感知的友好程度以及就地养老的意愿。
Gerontologist. 2022 Jan 14;62(1):46-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab070.
5
Effects of Perceived Neighbourhood Environments on Self-Rated Health among Community-Dwelling Older Chinese.感知邻里环境对中国社区居住老年人群自评健康的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 7;14(6):614. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060614.
6
Engaging Older People in Age-Friendly Cities through Participatory Video Design.通过参与式视频设计让老年人参与友好型城市建设。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 2;17(23):8977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238977.
7
Age-Friendly Environments in ASEAN Plus Three: Case Studies from Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar, Vietnam, and Thailand.东盟加三地区的老年友好型环境:来自日本、马来西亚、缅甸、越南和泰国的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4523. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124523.
8
Comparing the Age-Friendliness of Different Neighbourhoods Using District Surveys: An Example from Hong Kong.利用地区调查比较不同社区的年龄友好程度:以香港为例。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 1;10(7):e0131526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131526. eCollection 2015.
9
Associations of City-Level Active Aging and Age Friendliness with Well-Being among Older Adults Aged 55 and Over in Taiwan.城市层面的积极老龄化和友好老龄化与台湾 55 岁及以上老年人福祉的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;17(12):4304. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124304.
10
How Older People Experience the Age-Friendliness of Their City: Development of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire.老年人如何体验城市的宜居性:宜居城市和社区问卷的制定。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 20;17(18):6867. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186867.

引用本文的文献

1
Frail older people ageing in place alone and their perception of the built environment in rural and urban sites: a mixed-methods study.独自居家养老的体弱老年人及其对农村和城市地区建成环境的认知:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06083-5.
2
Social inclusion programming for older adults living in age-friendly cities: a scoping review.针对生活在老年友好型城市的老年人的社会融入项目:一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):e088439. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088439.
3
Aging towards walkable futures: insights from a multidisciplinary workshop held in Barcelona, Spain.迈向适宜步行的未来:来自在西班牙巴塞罗那举办的多学科研讨会的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 17;25(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21223-z.
4
Active aging and urban policies: the space as an instrument for an inclusive and sustainable city.积极老龄化与城市政策:将空间作为建设包容和可持续城市的工具。
Front Sociol. 2023 Dec 11;8:1257926. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1257926. eCollection 2023.
5
The relationship between loneliness and healthy aging indicators in Brazil (ELSI-Brazil) and England (ELSA): sex differences.巴西(ELSI-Brazil)和英国(ELSA)的孤独感与健康老龄化指标之间的关系:性别差异。
Public Health. 2023 Mar;216:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.01.005. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
6
The Relationship between Social Participation and Subjective Well-Being among Older People in the Chinese Culture Context: The Mediating Effect of Reciprocity Beliefs.文化语境下中国人的社会参与与主观幸福感的关系:互惠信念的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16367. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316367.
7
Friendly Residential Environments and Subjective Well-Being in Older People with and without Help Needs.有和没有帮助需求的老年人的友好居住环境与主观幸福感。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;19(23):15832. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315832.
8
Assessment of Environmental Demands of Age-Friendly Communities from Perspectives of Different Residential Groups: A Case of Wuhan, China.从不同居住群体视角评估老年友好社区的环境需求:以中国武汉为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9120. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159120.
9
Suggesting Indicators of Age-Friendly City: Social Participation and Happiness, an Ecological Study from the JAGES.提出友好城市的指标:社会参与和幸福,来自 JAGES 的一项生态研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 22;19(9):5096. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095096.
10
Relationships among mental health, social capital and life satisfaction in rural senior older adults: a structural equation model.农村高龄老年人心理健康、社会资本与生活满意度的关系:结构方程模型。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 24;22(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02761-w.

本文引用的文献

1
How Older People Experience the Age-Friendliness of Their City: Development of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire.老年人如何体验城市的宜居性:宜居城市和社区问卷的制定。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 20;17(18):6867. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186867.
2
Age-friendly environments and psychosocial wellbeing: a study of older urban residents in Ireland.友好的环境与心理健康:对爱尔兰城市老年居民的研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Dec;24(12):2022-2033. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1652246. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
3
Age-friendly cities: challenges for future research.适老城市:未来研究面临的挑战
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Jun 1;97(6):436-437. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.224865. Epub 2019 May 14.
4
Age-Friendly Initiatives, Social Inequalities, and Spatial Justice.老年友好型举措、社会不平等和空间正义。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Sep;48 Suppl 3:S41-S45. doi: 10.1002/hast.912.
5
An evaluation tool for Age-Friendly and Dementia Friendly Communities.一个适用于友善老年及友善痴呆症社区的评估工具。
Work Older People. 2018;22(1):48-58. doi: 10.1108/WWOP-11-2017-0032.
6
[Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use].[研究中的性别平等:SAGER 指南的基本原理及推荐用法]
Gac Sanit. 2019 Mar-Apr;33(2):203-210. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 May 3.
7
The home environment and quality of life-related outcomes in advanced old age: findings of the ENABLE-AGE project.高龄老人的家庭环境与生活质量相关结局:ENABLE-AGE项目的研究结果
Eur J Ageing. 2009 Apr 16;6(2):101-111. doi: 10.1007/s10433-009-0114-z. eCollection 2009 Jun.
8
The Role of Age-Friendly Environments on Quality of Life among Thai Older Adults.对泰国老年人而言,友善老年环境对生活质量的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 9;14(3):282. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030282.
9
Developing indicators for evaluation of age-friendly communities in Canada: process and results.制定加拿大老年友好社区评估指标:过程和结果。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016 Oct;36(10):214-223. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.10.02.
10
Age-friendly environments and life satisfaction among South Korean elders: person-environment fit perspective.韩国老年人的友好型环境与生活满意度:人与环境适配视角
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Jul;21(7):693-702. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1154011. Epub 2016 Mar 3.