Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Int J Cancer. 2021 Aug 1;149(3):561-572. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33553. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival have been reported in various countries but it is uncertain to what extent they persist in countries with relatively comprehensive health insurance coverage such as Germany. We investigated the association between area-based socioeconomic deprivation on municipality level and cancer survival for 25 cancer sites in Germany. We used data from seven population-based cancer registries (covering 32 million inhabitants). Patients diagnosed in 1998 to 2014 with one of 25 most common cancer sites were included. Area-based socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the categorized German Index of Multiple Deprivation (GIMD) on municipality level. We estimated 3-month, 1-year, 5-year and 5-year conditional on 1-year age-standardized relative survival using period approach for 2012 to 2014. Trend analyses were conducted for periods between 2003-2005 and 2012-2014. Model-based period analysis was used to calculate relative excess risks (RER) adjusted for age and stage. In total, 2 333 547 cases were included. For all cancers combined, 5-year survival rates by GIMD quintile were 61.6% in Q1 (least deprived), 61.2% in Q2, 60.4% in Q3, 59.9% in Q4 and 59.0% in Q5 (most deprived). For most cancer sites, the most deprived quintile had lower 5-year survival compared to the least deprived quintile even after adjusting for stage (all cancer sites combined, RER 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.19). For some cancer sites, this association was stronger during short-term follow-up. Trend analyses showed improved survival from earlier to recent periods but persisting deprivation differences. The underlying reasons for these persisting survival inequalities and strategies to overcome them should be further investigated.
在不同国家都有报道称,癌症存活率存在社会经济不平等现象,但在德国等相对全面覆盖健康保险的国家,这种不平等现象究竟持续到何种程度还不确定。我们研究了德国市级行政区层面的社会经济剥夺程度与 25 种癌症存活率之间的关联。我们使用了来自七个基于人群的癌症登记处(覆盖 3200 万居民)的数据。纳入的患者在 1998 年至 2014 年间被诊断出患有 25 种最常见癌症中的一种。市级行政区层面的社会经济剥夺程度使用德国多维度剥夺指数(GIMD)的分类进行评估。我们使用时期方法估计了 2012 年至 2014 年期间的 3 个月、1 年、5 年和 5 年条件生存率(基于 1 年的年龄标准化相对生存率)。对 2003-2005 年和 2012-2014 年期间进行了趋势分析。使用基于模型的时期分析计算了调整年龄和分期后的相对超额风险(RER)。共纳入 2333547 例病例。在所有癌症中,GIMD 五分位数的 5 年生存率分别为 Q1(最不贫困)的 61.6%、Q2 的 61.2%、Q3 的 60.4%、Q4 的 59.9%和 Q5(最贫困)的 59.0%。对于大多数癌症部位,即使在调整了分期后,最贫困五分位数的 5 年生存率仍低于最不贫困五分位数(所有癌症部位合并,RER 1.16,95%置信区间 1.14-1.19)。对于一些癌症部位,这种关联在短期随访中更强。趋势分析显示,从早期到近期,生存率有所提高,但社会经济剥夺差异仍然存在。对于这些持续存在的生存不平等现象的根本原因和克服这些不平等现象的策略,应进一步进行调查。