• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Demographic and public health characteristics explain large part of variability in COVID-19 mortality across countries.人口统计学和公共卫生特征解释了 COVID-19 死亡率在各国之间存在巨大差异的很大一部分原因。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Feb 1;31(1):12-16. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa226.
2
The association between various indicators of hospital capacity, age category, and the number of screening tests performed with case fatality rate and recovery rate during the COVID-19 disease pandemic.在 COVID-19 疾病大流行期间,医院容量的各种指标、年龄类别以及筛查测试数量与病死率和康复率之间的关系。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2021 Jul 30;62(2):E261-E269. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.2.1569. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Factors influencing the COVID-19 daily deaths' peak across European countries.影响欧洲各国 COVID-19 每日死亡人数峰值的因素。
Public Health. 2021 May;194:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.037. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
4
Global age-sex-specific mortality, life expectancy, and population estimates in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1950-2021, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.204 个国家和地区及 811 个次国家级行政单位 1950 年至 2021 年的全球年龄、性别特异性死亡率、预期寿命和人口估计,以及 COVID-19 大流行的影响:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的综合人口分析。
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):1989-2056. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00476-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
5
Response strategies for COVID-19 epidemics in African settings: a mathematical modelling study.非洲环境下应对 COVID-19 疫情的策略:一项数学建模研究。
BMC Med. 2020 Oct 14;18(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01789-2.
6
Country-level determinants of the severity of the first global wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: an ecological study.国家层面因素对 COVID-19 大流行首个全球浪潮严重程度的影响:一项生态学研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 3;11(2):e042034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042034.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Population risk factors for COVID-19 deaths in Nigeria at sub-national level.尼日利亚次国家层面新冠病毒疾病死亡的人群风险因素。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Aug 4;35(Suppl 2):131. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.35.131.25258. eCollection 2020.
9
Assessing sub-regional-specific strengths of healthcare systems associated with COVID-19 prevalence, deaths and recoveries in Africa.评估非洲与 COVID-19 流行、死亡和康复相关的医疗保健系统的亚区域特定优势。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 1;16(3):e0247274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247274. eCollection 2021.
10
The 5% of the Population at High Risk for Severe COVID-19 Infection Is Identifiable and Needs to Be Taken Into Account When Reopening the Economy.新冠病毒严重感染高风险的5%人群是可识别的,在经济重启时需要予以考虑。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2020 May;26(3):219-227. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000475.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-COVID-19 health inequalities: Estimates of the potential loss in the evolution of the health-related SDGs indicators.新冠疫情后健康不平等问题:对与健康相关的可持续发展目标指标演变过程中潜在损失的估计。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 24;19(7):e0305955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305955. eCollection 2024.
2
Demographic study of patients' mortality rate before and after the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study.新冠疫情爆发前后患者死亡率的人口统计学研究:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 8;7(2):e1845. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1845. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Evaluation of the Global Health Security Index as a predictor of COVID-19 excess mortality standardised for under-reporting and age structure.评估全球卫生安全指数作为对漏报和年龄结构标准化的 COVID-19 超额死亡率的预测指标。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jun;8(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012203.
4
A large-scale machine learning study of sociodemographic factors contributing to COVID-19 severity.一项关于导致新冠病毒疾病严重程度的社会人口学因素的大规模机器学习研究。
Front Big Data. 2023 Mar 24;6:1038283. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1038283. eCollection 2023.
5
COVID-19 precautionary behaviors and vaccine acceptance among older individuals: The role of close kin.老年人对 COVID-19 的预防行为和疫苗接种接受度:近亲的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 28;120(13):e2214382120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214382120. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
6
Country-level and regional COVID-19 burden and determinants across OECD member states and partner countries.经合组织成员国和伙伴国家的国家级和地区级 COVID-19 负担及其决定因素。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2022;27:41. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.22-00054.
7
Close kin influence COVID-19 precautionary behaviors and vaccine acceptance of older individuals.近亲会影响老年人的新冠疫情预防行为和疫苗接种意愿。
Res Sq. 2022 Jun 2:rs.3.rs-1699988. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1699988/v1.
8
Ecological Model Explaining the Psychosocial Adaptation to COVID-19.解释 COVID-19 下心理社会适应的生态模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 24;19(9):5159. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095159.
9
Modeling Years of Life Lost Due to COVID-19, Socioeconomic Status, and Nonpharmaceutical Interventions: Development of a Prediction Model.因新冠疫情、社会经济地位及非药物干预导致的寿命损失建模:预测模型的开发
JMIRx Med. 2022 Apr 12;3(2):e30144. doi: 10.2196/30144. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
10
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Coverage and Key Public Health Indicators May Explain Disparities in COVID-19 Country-Specific Case Fatality Rate Within European Economic Area.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗接种覆盖率和关键公共卫生指标或可解释欧洲经济区内各国新冠病毒病(COVID-19)特定国家病死率的差异。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 9;14(3):e22989. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22989. eCollection 2022 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Locally Informed Simulation to Predict Hospital Capacity Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.用于预测新冠疫情期间医院容量需求的局部知情模拟
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Oct 20;173(8):680-681. doi: 10.7326/L20-1062.
2
National case fatality rates of the COVID-19 pandemic.国家 COVID-19 大流行的病死率。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jan;27(1):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
Population Risk Factors for COVID-19 Mortality in 93 Countries.93 个国家 COVID-19 死亡率的人口风险因素。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020 Sep;10(3):204-208. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.200721.001.
4
Europe's War against COVID-19: A Map of Countries' Disease Vulnerability Using Mortality Indicators.欧洲抗击 COVID-19 大流行:利用死亡率指标绘制的各国疾病脆弱性图谱
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 9;17(18):6565. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186565.
5
The Global Health Security index and Joint External Evaluation score for health preparedness are not correlated with countries' COVID-19 detection response time and mortality outcome.全球卫生安全指数和卫生准备联合外部评估得分与各国的 COVID-19 检测响应时间和死亡率结果无关。
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Sep 7;148:e210. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820002046.
6
Death tolls of COVID-19: Where come the fallacies and ways to make them more accurate.新冠疫情死亡人数:错误从何而来以及如何使它们更准确。
Glob Public Health. 2020 Oct;15(10):1582-1587. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1808040. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
7
COVID-19 Global Risk: Expectation vs. Reality.COVID-19 全球风险:预期与现实。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 3;17(15):5592. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155592.
8
Under-reporting of COVID-19 cases in Turkey.土耳其 COVID-19 病例漏报情况。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Sep;35(5):1009-1013. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3031. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
9
The macroecology of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Anthropocene.人类世大流行病 COVID-19 的宏观生态学。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0236856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236856. eCollection 2020.
10
Factors determining different death rates because of the COVID-19 outbreak among countries.导致各国因 COVID-19 疫情而出现不同死亡率的因素。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Nov 23;42(4):681-687. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa119.

人口统计学和公共卫生特征解释了 COVID-19 死亡率在各国之间存在巨大差异的很大一部分原因。

Demographic and public health characteristics explain large part of variability in COVID-19 mortality across countries.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2021 Feb 1;31(1):12-16. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa226.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckaa226
PMID:33479720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7928985/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The numbers of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths per million people differ widely across countries. Often, the causal effects of interventions taken by authorities are unjustifiably concluded based on the comparison of pure mortalities in countries where interventions consisting different strategies have been taken. Moreover, the possible effects of other factors are only rarely considered.

METHODS

We used data from open databases (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, World Bank Open Data, The BCG World Atlas) and publications to develop a model that could largely explain the differences in cumulative mortality between countries using non-interventional (mostly socio-demographic) factors.

RESULTS

Statistically significant associations with the logarithmic COVID-19 mortality were found with the following: proportion of people aged 80 years and above, population density, proportion of urban population, gross domestic product, number of hospital beds per population, average temperature in March and incidence of tuberculosis. The final model could explain 67% of the variability. This finding could also be interpreted as follows: less than a third of the variability in logarithmic mortality differences could be modified by diverse non-pharmaceutical interventions ranging from case isolation to comprehensive measures, constituting case isolation, social distancing of the entire population and closure of schools and borders.

CONCLUSIONS

In particular countries, the number of people who will die from COVID-19 is largely given by factors that cannot be drastically changed as an immediate reaction to the pandemic and authorities should focus on modifiable variables, e.g. the number of hospital beds.

摘要

背景

各国每百万人中因 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)而死亡的人数差异很大。通常,根据采取不同策略的干预措施的国家之间的纯死亡率比较,不合理地得出当局采取的干预措施的因果效应。此外,很少考虑其他因素的可能影响。

方法

我们使用来自开放数据库(欧洲疾病预防控制中心,世界银行开放数据,BCG 世界地图集)和出版物的数据来开发一个模型,该模型可以使用非干预措施(主要是社会人口统计学因素)来很大程度上解释国家之间累积死亡率的差异。

结果

与对数 COVID-19 死亡率呈统计学显著关联的因素包括:80 岁及以上人口比例、人口密度、城市人口比例、国内生产总值、每人口医院床位数、3 月平均温度和肺结核发病率。最终模型可以解释 67%的变异性。这一发现也可以解释为:对数死亡率差异的可变性中,不到三分之一可以通过从病例隔离到综合措施的各种非药物干预措施来改变,这些措施包括病例隔离、全民社会隔离以及学校和边境关闭。

结论

在特定国家,死于 COVID-19 的人数在很大程度上取决于无法作为对大流行的立即反应而急剧改变的因素,当局应关注可改变的变量,例如医院床位数量。