Division of Internal Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
J Travel Med. 2021 Feb 23;28(2). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taab005.
Nearly a year into the COVID-19 pandemic, we still lack effective anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs with substantial impact on mortality rates except for dexamethasone. As the search for effective antiviral agents continues, we aimed to review data on the potential of repurposing antiparasitic drugs against viruses in general, with an emphasis on coronaviruses.
We performed a review by screening in vitro and in vivo studies that assessed the antiviral activity of several antiparasitic agents: chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), mefloquine, artemisinins, ivermectin, nitazoxanide (NTZ), niclosamide, atovaquone and albendazole.
For HCQ and chloroquine we found ample in vitro evidence of antiviral activity. Cohort studies that assessed the use of HCQ for COVID-19 reported conflicting results, but randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated no effect on mortality rates and no substantial clinical benefits of HCQ used either for prevention or treatment of COVID-19. We found two clinical studies of artemisinins and two studies of NTZ for treatment of viruses other than COVID-19, all of which showed mixed results. Ivermectin was evaluated in one RCT and few observational studies, demonstrating conflicting results. As the level of evidence of these data is low, the efficacy of ivermectin against COVID-19 remains to be proven. For chloroquine, HCQ, mefloquine, artemisinins, ivermectin, NTZ and niclosamide, we found in vitro studies showing some effects against a wide array of viruses. We found no relevant studies for atovaquone and albendazole.
As the search for an effective drug active against SARS-CoV-2 continues, we argue that pre-clinical research of possible antiviral effects of compounds that could have antiviral activity should be conducted. Clinical studies should be conducted when sufficient in vitro evidence exists, and drugs should be introduced into widespread clinical use only after being rigorously tested in RCTs. Such a search may prove beneficial in this pandemic or in outbreaks yet to come.
新冠疫情爆发已近一年,除地塞米松外,我们仍缺乏对死亡率有显著影响的有效抗 SARS-CoV-2 药物。随着对有效抗病毒药物的持续探索,我们旨在综述一般抗病毒药物再利用的研究数据,重点关注冠状病毒。
我们通过筛选评估几种抗寄生虫药物(氯喹、羟氯喹、甲氟喹、青蒿素、伊维菌素、硝唑尼特、尼氯柳胺、阿托伐醌和阿苯达唑)抗病毒活性的体外和体内研究进行综述。
对于羟氯喹和氯喹,我们发现了大量的体外抗病毒活性证据。评估羟氯喹治疗 COVID-19 的队列研究结果相互矛盾,但随机对照试验(RCT)表明,羟氯喹无论是用于预防还是治疗 COVID-19,对死亡率均无影响,也无显著的临床获益。我们找到了两项关于青蒿素和两项关于硝唑尼特治疗 COVID-19 以外病毒的临床研究,结果均不一致。伊维菌素仅在一项 RCT 和少数观察性研究中进行了评估,结果相互矛盾。鉴于这些数据的证据水平较低,伊维菌素对 COVID-19 的疗效仍有待证实。对于氯喹、羟氯喹、甲氟喹、青蒿素、伊维菌素、硝唑尼特和尼氯柳胺,我们发现了一些体外研究显示它们对多种病毒有一定的作用。对于阿托伐醌和阿苯达唑,我们未找到相关研究。
在寻找有效对抗 SARS-CoV-2 的药物的过程中,我们认为应该进行可能具有抗病毒活性的化合物的临床前研究,以探索其潜在的抗病毒作用。当有足够的体外证据时,应进行临床研究,只有在 RCT 中经过严格测试后,才能将药物广泛应用于临床。这种探索在当前的大流行或即将到来的疫情中可能是有益的。