• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较头孢托罗匹酯与标准治疗头孢菌素、联合或不联合万古霉素治疗儿科肺炎的 3 期、随机、研究者设盲试验。

A Phase 3, Randomized, Investigator-blinded Trial Comparing Ceftobiprole With a Standard-of-care Cephalosporin, With or Without Vancomycin, for the Treatment of Pneumonia in Pediatric Patients.

机构信息

From the Medical University, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Sveti Georgi," Plovdiv, Clinic of Pediatric and Genetic Diseases, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Amtel Hospital First Clinical LLC, Department of Pediatrics, Tbilisi, Georgia.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 Jun 1;40(6):e222-e229. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003077.

DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000003077
PMID:33480665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8104010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The advanced-generation, broad-spectrum, intravenous (IV) cephalosporin, ceftobiprole, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but its effects in pediatric patients have not been established.

METHODS

In this multicenter, investigator-blinded, active-controlled, phase 3 study, patients 3 months to <18 years old with HAP or CAP requiring hospitalization were randomized (2:1) to ceftobiprole versus standard-of-care (SoC) IV cephalosporin treatments (ceftazidime or ceftriaxone), with or without vancomycin. After at least 3 days' IV treatment, patients demonstrating clinical improvement could be switched to an oral antibiotic, to complete a minimum of 7 days' treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, 138 patients were randomized to ceftobiprole (n = 94) or a SoC cephalosporin (n = 44). Median time to oral switch was 6.0 days in the ceftobiprole group and 8.0 days in the SoC cephalosporin group. While on IV therapy, adverse events and treatment-related adverse events were reported by 20.2% and 8.5% of ceftobiprole-treated patients and 18.2% and 0% of SoC cephalosporin-treated patients. Early clinical response rates at day 4 in the intention-to-treat population were 95.7% and 93.2% (between-group difference, 2.6%; 95% confidence interval, -5.5% to 14.7%) in the ceftobiprole and comparator groups, and clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit were 90.4% and 97.7% (between-group difference, -7.3%; 95% confidence interval, -15.7% to 3.6%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftobiprole was well tolerated and, in this small phase 3 study, demonstrated similar efficacy to SoC cephalosporins in pediatric patients with HAP or CAP requiring hospitalization.

摘要

背景

新一代广谱静脉注射(IV)头孢菌素头孢托罗是一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗药物,适用于患有医院获得性肺炎(HAP)或社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的成年人,但尚未在儿科患者中确立其疗效。

方法

在这项多中心、研究者设盲、活性对照、3 期研究中,3 个月至<18 岁、需要住院治疗的 HAP 或 CAP 患者按 2:1 的比例随机分配至头孢托罗组(n=94)或标准治疗(SoC)IV 头孢菌素组(n=44),其中头孢托罗组加用或不加用万古霉素。接受至少 3 天的 IV 治疗后,如果患者临床症状改善,可转换为口服抗生素,完成至少 7 天的治疗。

结果

共有 138 例患者被随机分配至头孢托罗组(n=94)或 SoC 头孢菌素组(n=44)。头孢托罗组达到口服转换的中位时间为 6.0 天,SoC 头孢菌素组为 8.0 天。在接受 IV 治疗期间,头孢托罗组分别有 20.2%和 8.5%的患者报告发生不良事件和治疗相关不良事件,SoC 头孢菌素组分别有 18.2%和 0%的患者报告发生上述事件。意向治疗人群在第 4 天的早期临床应答率分别为头孢托罗组 95.7%和对照组 93.2%(组间差异为 2.6%;95%置信区间为-5.5%至 14.7%),在治愈测试访视时的临床治愈率分别为头孢托罗组 90.4%和对照组 97.7%(组间差异为-7.3%;95%置信区间为-15.7%至 3.6%)。

结论

头孢托罗具有良好的耐受性,在这项小型 3 期研究中,头孢托罗在需要住院治疗的 HAP 或 CAP 儿科患者中的疗效与 SoC 头孢菌素相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b2f/8104010/005a60f732d2/inf-40-e222-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b2f/8104010/3ea8c2157fe3/inf-40-e222-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b2f/8104010/d0e71c3f5a20/inf-40-e222-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b2f/8104010/005a60f732d2/inf-40-e222-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b2f/8104010/3ea8c2157fe3/inf-40-e222-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b2f/8104010/d0e71c3f5a20/inf-40-e222-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b2f/8104010/005a60f732d2/inf-40-e222-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Phase 3, Randomized, Investigator-blinded Trial Comparing Ceftobiprole With a Standard-of-care Cephalosporin, With or Without Vancomycin, for the Treatment of Pneumonia in Pediatric Patients.一项比较头孢托罗匹酯与标准治疗头孢菌素、联合或不联合万古霉素治疗儿科肺炎的 3 期、随机、研究者设盲试验。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 Jun 1;40(6):e222-e229. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003077.
2
Ceftobiprole medocaril: a review of its use in patients with hospital- or community-acquired pneumonia.头孢托罗匹酯:在治疗医院获得性或社区获得性肺炎患者中的应用评价。
Drugs. 2014 Sep;74(13):1523-42. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0273-x.
3
A phase 3 randomized double-blind comparison of ceftobiprole medocaril versus ceftazidime plus linezolid for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia.头孢比普甲磺酸盐与头孢他啶加利奈唑胺治疗医院获得性肺炎的3期随机双盲对照试验
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 1;59(1):51-61. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu219. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
4
Early improvement in severely ill patients with pneumonia treated with ceftobiprole: a retrospective analysis of two major trials.严重肺炎患者应用头孢托罗匹酯治疗的早期改善:两项大型试验的回顾性分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 26;19(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3820-y.
5
Ceftobiprole for the treatment of pneumonia: a European perspective.头孢比普用于治疗肺炎:欧洲视角
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Aug 18;9:4565-72. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S56616. eCollection 2015.
6
A randomised, double-blind trial comparing ceftobiprole medocaril with ceftriaxone with or without linezolid for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation.一项比较头孢托罗匹酯美他醇与头孢曲松及联用或不联用利奈唑胺治疗需要住院治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的随机、双盲临床试验。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012 Mar;39(3):240-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.11.005. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
7
A Multicenter, Randomized, Observer-blinded, Active-controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Ceftaroline Compared With Ceftriaxone Plus Vancomycin in Pediatric Patients With Complicated Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia.一项多中心、随机、观察者盲法、活性对照研究,评估头孢洛林与头孢曲松加万古霉素相比在患有复杂性社区获得性细菌性肺炎的儿科患者中的安全性和有效性。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Jul;35(7):760-6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001160.
8
Ceftobiprole: a review of a broad-spectrum and anti-MRSA cephalosporin.头孢比普:一种广谱抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌头孢菌素的综述。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2008;9(4):245-54. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200809040-00004.
9
Ceftobiprole and pneumonia in adults admitted to the emergency department is it time to assess a new therapeutic algorithm?头孢比普与急诊科成人肺炎:是时候评估一种新的治疗方案了吗?
J Chemother. 2021 May;33(3):174-179. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2020.1821486. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
10
Ceftobiprole Compared With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Trial (TARGET).头孢托罗匹酯与万古霉素加氨曲南治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的比较:一项 3 期、随机、双盲试验(TARGET)的结果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):e1507-e1517. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa974.

引用本文的文献

1
Nephrotoxicity of New Antibiotics: A Systematic Review.新型抗生素的肾毒性:一项系统评价
Toxics. 2025 Jul 19;13(7):606. doi: 10.3390/toxics13070606.
2
Ceftobiprole versus ceftriaxone ± linezolid in Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP): Re-analysis of a randomized, phase 3 study using 2020 FDA guidance.头孢比普与头孢曲松±利奈唑胺治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP):根据2020年美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)指南对一项随机3期研究进行重新分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 24;20(6):e0326758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326758. eCollection 2025.
3
Antibiotics versus Non-Antibiotic in the treatment of Aspiration Pneumonia: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.
抗生素与非抗生素治疗吸入性肺炎的对比:MIMIC-IV数据库分析
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03441-8.
4
Antibiotics for hospital-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children.新生儿和儿童医院获得性肺炎的抗生素治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 2;11(11):CD013864. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013864.pub2.
5
Model-Based Approach for Optimizing Ceftobiprole Dosage in Pediatric Patients.基于模型的优化儿童患者头孢托罗匹酯剂量的方法。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Oct 18;65(11):e0120621. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01206-21. Epub 2021 Aug 16.