Suppr超能文献

成人自报告问卷和活动记录仪睡眠模式的一致性分析。

Agreement analysis of sleep patterns between self-reported questionnaires and actigraphy in adults.

机构信息

Department of Support Sciences, Oman College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 1595- PC 114, Bousher, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 35- PC 124, Al Khoud, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2021 Dec;25(4):1885-1891. doi: 10.1007/s11325-021-02296-1. Epub 2021 Jan 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the agreement in sleep pattern recording by self-reported sleep questionnaires and actigraphy in adults.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. Men and women who met inclusion criteria were recruited for this study. The inclusion criteria were apparently healthy Omani nationals ages 19 to 50 years. Sleep questionnaires were randomly distributed in Muscat either directly or via electronic and paper announcements. Data were collected from the participants using the self-reported questionnaires with four piloted questions for sleep pattern identification and through the actigraphy wristband given to subjects to wear for a week. Cohen's kappa test was performed for agreement analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 964 Omani subjects between ages 18 and 59 years of both genders were recruited and completed the questionnaires successfully. Out of these, only 321 subjects wore the actigraphy wristband for 1 week (response rate = 33%). Agreement analysis reported a mild level of agreement for the monophasic (41%), moderate level for biphasic (59%), and good level for polyphasic (70%) sleep patterns. The overall agreement level of sleep patterns between the two methods was 57%. There is a low specificity of self-reported assessment in reporting sleep pattern.

CONCLUSION

The average agreement level of subjective versus objective assessments of sleep patterns was moderate at 57% and self-reported sleep pattern is not specific. The study recommends the use of actigraphy along with sleep questionnaires for accurate assessment of sleep patterns in cohort studies.

摘要

目的

研究成年人通过自我报告的睡眠问卷和活动记录仪记录睡眠模式的一致性。

方法

这是一项横断面研究。符合纳入标准的男性和女性均被招募参加本研究。纳入标准为年龄在 19 至 50 岁的明显健康的阿曼国民。睡眠问卷随机分发给马斯喀特的居民,包括直接分发和通过电子和纸质公告分发。通过自我报告的问卷收集参与者的数据,问卷中包含四个用于睡眠模式识别的试点问题,并通过活动记录仪腕带让受试者佩戴一周。使用 Cohen's kappa 检验进行一致性分析。

结果

共招募了 964 名年龄在 18 至 59 岁的阿曼男女受试者,他们成功完成了问卷。其中,只有 321 名受试者佩戴活动记录仪一周(应答率=33%)。一致性分析报告了单相(41%)、双相(59%)和多相(70%)睡眠模式的轻度一致性、中度一致性和良好一致性。两种方法之间睡眠模式的总体一致性水平为 57%。自我报告评估在报告睡眠模式方面特异性较低。

结论

主观与客观评估睡眠模式的平均一致性水平为 57%,且自我报告的睡眠模式不具有特异性。该研究建议在队列研究中使用活动记录仪和睡眠问卷来准确评估睡眠模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验