School of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Center for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Acta Trop. 2021 Apr;216:105837. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105837. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
Ethiopia has shown a notable progress in reducing malaria burden over the past decade, mainly due to the scaleup of vector control interventions such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). Based on the progress, the country has set goals to eliminate malaria by 2030. However, residual malaria transmission due to early evening and outdoor biting vectors could pose a challenge to malaria elimination efforts. This study assessed vector behavior, patterns of human exposure to vector bites and residual malaria transmission in southwestern Ethiopia. Anopheles mosquitoes were collected monthly from January to December 2018 using human landing catches (HLCs), human-baited double net traps, CDC light traps and pyrethrum spray catches. Human behavior data were collected using questionnaire to estimate the magnitude of human exposure to mosquito bites occurring indoors and outdoors at various times of the night. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to determine mosquito blood meal sources and sporozoite infections. A total of 2,038 female Anopheles mosquitoes comprising Anopheles arabiensis (30.8%), An. pharoensis (40.5%), An. coustani (28.1%), An. squamosus (0.3%) and An. funestus group (0.2%) were collected. Anopheles arabiensis and An. pharoensis were 2.4 and 2.5 times more likely to seek hosts outdoors than indoors, respectively. However, 66% of human exposure to An. arabiensis and 39% of exposure to An. pharoensis bites occurred indoors for LLIN non-users. For LLIN users, 75% of residual exposure to An. arabiensis bites occurred outdoors while 23% occurred indoors before bed time. Likewise, 84% of residual exposure to An. pharoensis bites occurred outdoors while 15% occurred indoors before people retired to bed. Anopheles arabiensis and An. pharoensis were 4.1 and 4.8 times more likely to feed on bovine than humans, respectively. Based on the HLC, an estimated indoor and outdoor EIR of An. arabiensis was 6.2 and 1.4 infective bites/person/year, respectively, whereas An. pharoensis had an estimated outdoor EIR of 3.0 infective bites/person/year. In conclusion, An. arabiensis and An. pharoensis showed exophagic and zoophagic behavior. Human exposure to An. arabiensis bites occurred mostly indoors for LLIN non-users, while most of the exposure to both An. arabiensis and An. pharoensis bites occurred outdoors for LLIN users. Malaria transmission by An. arabiensis occurred both indoors and outdoors, whereas An. pharoensis contributed exclusively to outdoor transmission. Additional control tools targeting early-evening and outdoor biting malaria vectors are required to complement the current control interventions to control residual transmission and ultimately achieve malaria elimination.
埃塞俄比亚在过去十年中在减少疟疾负担方面取得了显著进展,主要得益于病媒控制干预措施的扩大,如长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)和室内滞留喷洒(IRS)。基于这一进展,该国设定了到 2030 年消除疟疾的目标。然而,由于傍晚和户外叮咬媒介的残留疟疾传播,可能会对消除疟疾的努力构成挑战。本研究评估了西南埃塞俄比亚病媒行为、人类接触病媒叮咬和残留疟疾传播的模式。2018 年 1 月至 12 月,每月使用人体着陆捕获(HLC)、人诱双网陷阱、CDC 灯诱和除虫菊酯喷雾捕获收集疟蚊。使用问卷收集人类行为数据,以估计夜间不同时间室内和室外蚊子叮咬的人类暴露程度。酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)用于确定蚊子的血餐来源和孢子感染。共收集了 2038 只雌性疟蚊,包括阿拉伯疟蚊(30.8%)、Pharoensis 疟蚊(40.5%)、库斯塔尼疟蚊(28.1%)、斑足疟蚊(0.3%)和致倦库蚊组(0.2%)。阿拉伯疟蚊和 Pharoensis 疟蚊分别有 2.4 倍和 2.5 倍的可能性在户外而不是室内寻找宿主。然而,66%的 LLIN 非使用者在室内接触到阿拉伯疟蚊,39%的人在室内接触到 Pharoensis 疟蚊。对于 LLIN 用户,75%的残留阿拉伯疟蚊叮咬暴露发生在户外,23%发生在睡前。同样,84%的残留 Pharoensis 疟蚊叮咬暴露发生在户外,而 15%发生在人们上床睡觉之前。阿拉伯疟蚊和 Pharoensis 疟蚊分别有 4.1 倍和 4.8 倍的可能性以牛为食而不是以人为食。根据 HLC,估计室内和室外阿拉伯疟蚊的 EIR 分别为 6.2 和 1.4 感染性叮咬/人/年,而 Pharoensis 疟蚊的室外 EIR 估计为 3.0 感染性叮咬/人/年。总之,阿拉伯疟蚊和 Pharoensis 疟蚊表现出外生性和食源性行为。LLIN 非使用者大多数在室内接触到阿拉伯疟蚊叮咬,而 LLIN 用户则大多在户外接触到阿拉伯疟蚊和 Pharoensis 疟蚊叮咬。由阿拉伯疟蚊引起的疟疾传播既发生在室内,也发生在室外,而 Pharoensis 疟蚊仅导致室外传播。需要额外的控制工具来针对傍晚和户外叮咬的疟疾媒介,以补充当前的控制干预措施,以控制残留传播,并最终实现消除疟疾。