• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解利他主义中的高于平均水平效应。

Understanding the Better Than Average Effect on Altruism.

作者信息

Xiao Yunyu, Wong Kelly, Cheng Qijin, Yip Paul S F

机构信息

School of Social Work, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

School of Social Work, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 7;11:562846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562846. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562846
PMID:33488442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7817701/
Abstract

Prior research suggests that most people perceive themselves to be more altruistic than the average population, an observation known as the better-than-average (BTA) effect. Understanding the BTA effect carries significant public health implications, as self-perceived altruism is closely related to altruistic behaviors, which plays a significant role in individual and societal well-being. However, little is known about whether subpopulations with specific sociodemographic profiles are more likely to hold BTA altruistic self-perceptions, making it difficult to design targeted programs based on multiple sociodemographic characteristics to promote altruistic behaviors. This study addresses this gap by identifying the sociodemographic profiles of populations who are more likely to exhibit BTA effects on trait altruism. Data were derived from a representative sample of Hong Kong citizens ( = 1,185) in the 2017 Hong Kong Altruism Survey. A latent class analysis was performed using four domains of sociodemographic characteristics: sex, age, religion, and socioeconomic status. Multivariate multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to examine associations between class membership, BTA effect, and altruistic behaviors. The results yielded four classes of sociodemographic profiles. Middle-aged, Christian/Catholic, highly educated, and high-income individuals (Class 4, 17.8%) were most likely to exhibit BTA effects and behave altruistically; Class 3 (14.0%) were older, male, no/other religious belief, low education, and least likely to exhibit BTA effects and behave altruistically. Findings improve the understanding of the sociodemographic profiles of people showing BTA effects and facilitate targeted policy development to effectively promote altruism.

摘要

先前的研究表明,大多数人认为自己比一般人更具利他主义精神,这一现象被称为优于平均水平(BTA)效应。理解BTA效应具有重大的公共卫生意义,因为自我认知的利他主义与利他行为密切相关,而利他行为在个人和社会福祉中发挥着重要作用。然而,对于具有特定社会人口统计学特征的亚群体是否更有可能持有BTA利他主义自我认知,我们知之甚少,这使得难以根据多种社会人口统计学特征设计针对性的项目来促进利他行为。本研究通过确定更有可能在特质利他主义上表现出BTA效应的人群的社会人口统计学特征来填补这一空白。数据来自2017年香港利他主义调查中具有代表性的香港市民样本(n = 1185)。使用社会人口统计学特征的四个领域进行了潜在类别分析:性别、年龄、宗教和社会经济地位。进行了多变量多项逻辑回归分析,以检验类别归属、BTA效应和利他行为之间的关联。结果产生了四类社会人口统计学特征。中年、基督教/天主教、受过高等教育和高收入的个体(第4类,17.8%)最有可能表现出BTA效应并做出利他行为;第3类(14.0%)年龄较大、男性、无/其他宗教信仰、教育程度低,最不可能表现出BTA效应并做出利他行为。研究结果增进了对表现出BTA效应的人群的社会人口统计学特征的理解,并有助于制定有针对性的政策,以有效促进利他主义。

相似文献

1
Understanding the Better Than Average Effect on Altruism.理解利他主义中的高于平均水平效应。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 7;11:562846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562846. eCollection 2020.
2
Belief in Altruistic Motives Predicts Prosocial Actions and Inferences.相信利他动机可以预测亲社会行为和推断。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Aug;125(4):2191-2212. doi: 10.1177/00332941211013529. Epub 2021 May 26.
3
Understanding altruistic behavior: The joint role of prefrontal damage and OXTR genotype.理解利他行为:前额叶损伤和 OXTR 基因型的共同作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Nov 5;190:108686. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108686. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
4
Latent profiles of multidimensional prosocial behaviors: An examination of prosocial personality groups.多维亲社会行为的潜在特征:对亲社会人格群体的考察
J Soc Psychol. 2022 Mar 4;162(2):245-261. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1881031. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
Altruistic Giving Toward Refugees: Identifying Factors That Increase Citizens' Willingness to Help.对难民的利他性给予:确定增加公民帮助意愿的因素。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 9;12:689184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689184. eCollection 2021.
6
Altruistic and contractual remittances between male and female migrants and households in rural Thailand.泰国农村地区男女移民与家庭之间的利他性汇款和契约性汇款。
Demography. 2004 Nov;41(4):739-56. doi: 10.1353/dem.2004.0039.
7
Free to help? An experiment on free will belief and altruism.乐于提供帮助?一项关于自由意志信念与利他主义的实验。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 10;12(3):e0173193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173193. eCollection 2017.
8
Altruism and the Link to Pro-social Pandemic Behavior.利他主义与亲社会大流行行为的联系。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Jul 14;2:871891. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.871891. eCollection 2022.
9
Road users' engagement in prosocial and altruistic behaviors: A systematic review.道路使用者参与亲社会和利他行为:系统评价。
J Safety Res. 2022 Sep;82:342-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
10
Computational and Neurobiological Substrates of Cost-Benefit Integration in Altruistic Helping Decision.利他主义助人决策中的成本效益整合的计算神经生物学基础
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 14;41(15):3545-3561. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1939-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
'The best interest of patients, not self-interest': how clinicians understand altruism.“以患者利益为重,而非自身利益”:临床医生如何理解利他主义。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Sep 7;21(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02908-0.
2
Adolescent social networks matter for suicidal trajectories: disparities across race/ethnicity, sex, sexual identity, and socioeconomic status.青少年社交网络对自杀轨迹至关重要:种族/族裔、性别、性取向和社会经济地位方面的差异
Psychol Med. 2021 Mar 3;52(15):1-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721000465.
3
Racial/Ethnic, Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Suicidal Trajectories and Mental Health Treatment Among Adolescents Transitioning to Young Adulthood in the USA: A Population-Based Cohort Study.美国青少年向成年过渡期的自杀轨迹和心理健康治疗中的种族/民族、性别、性取向和社会经济差异:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Sep;48(5):742-756. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01122-w. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.性别与助人行为:社会心理学文献的元分析综述
Psychol Bull. 1986 Nov;100(3):283-308. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283.
2
Increasing altruistic and cooperative behaviour with simple moral nudges.通过简单的道德推动增加利他主义和合作行为。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 15;9(1):11880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48094-4.
3
A latent class analysis of health lifestyles and suicidal behaviors among US adolescents.美国青少年健康生活方式和自杀行为的潜在类别分析。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Aug 1;255:116-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.031. Epub 2019 May 20.
4
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour.社会阶层心理学:社会经济地位如何影响思想、情感和行为。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):267-291. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12251. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
5
The Illusion of Moral Superiority.道德优越感的错觉
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 Aug;8(6):623-631. doi: 10.1177/1948550616673878. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
6
Protecting the Environment for Self-interested Reasons: Altruism Is Not the Only Pathway to Sustainability.出于自身利益保护环境:利他主义并非实现可持续发展的唯一途径。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 28;8:1065. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01065. eCollection 2017.
7
The Better-Than-Average Effect Is Observed Because "Average" Is Often Construed as Below-Median Ability.观察到优于平均效应是因为“平均”通常被理解为能力低于中位数。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 22;8:898. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00898. eCollection 2017.
8
Social Discounting in the Elderly: Senior Citizens are Good Samaritans to Strangers.老年人的社会贴现率:老年人对陌生人是乐善好施的好心人。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Jan 1;74(1):52-58. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx040.
9
Subjective wellbeing and income: Empirical patterns in the rural developing world.主观幸福感与收入:农村发展中世界的实证模式
J Happiness Stud. 2016 Apr;17(2):773-791. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9608-2.
10
A general benevolence dimension that links neural, psychological, economic, and life-span data on altruistic tendencies.一个将关于利他倾向的神经、心理、经济和寿命数据联系起来的普遍仁爱维度。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Oct;145(10):1351-1358. doi: 10.1037/xge0000209. Epub 2016 Aug 11.