• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品安全社会共治中消费者心理资本问卷的编制与验证

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire on Consumer Psychological Capital in Food Safety Social Co-governance.

作者信息

Meng Chun, Sun Lin, Guo Xiaoni, Wu Miao, Wang Yuqi, Yang Lingping, Peng Bin

机构信息

School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 7;11:584810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584810. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584810
PMID:33488452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7817848/
Abstract

Consumers play an important role as one of the main actors in food safety social co-governance. To create a pattern of food safety social co-governance, the active and effective participation of consumers is critical. To encourage consumers to participate in food safety social co-governance voluntarily and positively, we attempted to develop and preliminarily validate a multidimensional questionnaire on consumer psychological capital that could be used to measure the degree of consumer participation in food safety social co-governance. The aim of the initial sample ( = 170) and test sample 2 ( = 204) was to investigate the factor structure of a preliminary measure of consumer psychological capital. A 4-factor model with 23 items explained 61.05% of the total variance in item scores. The aim of test sample 3 ( = 30) was to measure the retest reliability. Test sample 4 ( = 1,076) was randomly allocated to the modeling sample ( = 538) and validation sample ( = 538) to verify questionnaire reliability and validity. Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and the internal inconsistency coefficients of the questionnaire were assessed in the modeling sample. While processing CFA, we deleted 9 items with small standardized factor loadings. The remaining 14 items in the final revised 4-factor model included self-efficacy, resilience, hope, and optimism. The fit indices of the revised four-factor model and second-order factor model in the modeling sample revealed an acceptable model fit. The convergent validity and discriminant validity of the revised model were good and acceptable, respectively. A cross-validation procedure confirmed the appropriateness of the revised four-factor model and second-order factor model in the validation sample. The cross-validation results confirmed that the fit indices of the revised four-factor model fitted the data well and the second-order factor model in the validation sample reached acceptable values. We concluded that the questionnaire developed in this study had good reliability and stable and acceptable construct validity. It could provide a theoretical basis for measuring psychological capital in food safety co-governance.

摘要

消费者作为食品安全社会共治的主要行为主体之一,发挥着重要作用。要构建食品安全社会共治格局,消费者的积极有效参与至关重要。为鼓励消费者自愿且积极地参与食品安全社会共治,我们尝试编制并初步验证一份关于消费者心理资本的多维问卷,该问卷可用于衡量消费者参与食品安全社会共治的程度。初始样本(n = 170)和测试样本2(n = 204)的目的是探究消费者心理资本初步测量指标的因子结构。一个包含23个条目的四因子模型解释了条目得分总方差的61.05%。测试样本3(n = 30)的目的是测量重测信度。测试样本4(n = 1076)被随机分配到建模样本(n = 538)和验证样本(n = 538)中,以验证问卷的信效度。在建模样本中评估了问卷的收敛效度、区分效度和内部一致性系数。在进行验证性因素分析时,我们删除了9个标准化因子载荷较小的条目。最终修订的四因子模型中的其余14个条目包括自我效能感、心理韧性、希望和乐观主义。建模样本中修订后的四因子模型和二阶因子模型的拟合指数显示模型拟合度可接受。修订模型的收敛效度和区分效度分别良好且可接受。交叉验证程序证实了修订后的四因子模型和二阶因子模型在验证样本中的适用性。交叉验证结果证实,修订后的四因子模型的拟合指数与数据拟合良好,验证样本中的二阶因子模型达到了可接受的值。我们得出结论,本研究编制的问卷具有良好的信度以及稳定且可接受的结构效度。它可为食品安全共治中测量心理资本提供理论依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffb9/7817848/2af863a57111/fpsyg-11-584810-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffb9/7817848/55b2f686ec22/fpsyg-11-584810-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffb9/7817848/2af863a57111/fpsyg-11-584810-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffb9/7817848/55b2f686ec22/fpsyg-11-584810-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffb9/7817848/2af863a57111/fpsyg-11-584810-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Questionnaire on Consumer Psychological Capital in Food Safety Social Co-governance.食品安全社会共治中消费者心理资本问卷的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 7;11:584810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584810. eCollection 2020.
2
Psychological Capital in Food Safety Social Co-governance.食品安全社会共治中的心理资本
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 1;10:1387. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01387. eCollection 2019.
3
Validation of a questionnaire for consumers' perception of service quality in community pharmacy.消费者感知社区药店服务质量问卷的验证。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jun;15(6):673-681. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
4
Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure family social capital.一份用于测量家庭社会资本的问卷的编制与验证
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Jul 16;8:100453. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100453. eCollection 2019 Aug.
5
Citizen Characteristics and Their Participation in Food Safety Social Co-governance: Public Health Implications.公民特征及其参与食品安全社会共治:公共卫生意义。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 24;9:772117. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.772117. eCollection 2021.
6
Reliability and Construct Validity of the Portuguese Version of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire.《心理资本问卷葡萄牙语版本的信度与结构效度》
Psychol Rep. 2017 Jun;120(3):520-536. doi: 10.1177/0033294116686742. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
7
Military Career Adaptability Questionnaire in China: Development and Validation.中国军人职业适应性问卷:编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 10;11:280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00280. eCollection 2020.
8
Validation of the patient measure of safety (PMOS) questionnaire in Australian public hospitals.验证患者安全量表(PMOS)问卷在澳大利亚公立医院中的适用性。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Feb 6;32(Supplement_1):67-74. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz097.
9
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
10
Validity of the Eating Attitude Test among Exercisers.锻炼者饮食态度测试的有效性。
J Sports Sci Med. 2004 Dec 1;3(4):244-53. eCollection 2004 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolutionary game analysis of FinTech transformation: A social co-governance pattern of peer-to-peer lending market in China.金融科技转型的演化博弈分析:中国网络借贷市场的一种社会协同治理模式
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 7;13:954132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954132. eCollection 2022.
2
Social Capital, Political Efficacy and Chinese Residents' Willingness to Participate in Food Safety Governance.社会资本、政治效能感与中国居民参与食品安全治理的意愿
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 13;19(20):13147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013147.
3
Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Social Co-governance of E-Commerce Intellectual Property Protection.

本文引用的文献

1
Food safety governance in China: From supervision to coregulation.中国的食品安全治理:从监管到共同治理
Food Sci Nutr. 2019 Nov 20;7(12):4127-4139. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1281. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
Food Safety Incident, Public Health Concern, and Risk Spillover Heterogeneity: Avian Influenza Shocks as Natural Experiments in China's Consumer Markets.食品安全事件、公共卫生关注和风险溢出异质性:中国消费者市场中的禽流感冲击作为自然实验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 29;16(21):4182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214182.
3
Psychological Capital in Food Safety Social Co-governance.
电子商务知识产权保护社会共治的演化博弈分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 18;13:832743. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832743. eCollection 2022.
食品安全社会共治中的心理资本
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 1;10:1387. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01387. eCollection 2019.
4
The role of whistleblowers in protecting the safety and integrity of the food supply.举报人在保护食品供应安全与完整性方面的作用。
NPJ Sci Food. 2018 May 8;2:8. doi: 10.1038/s41538-018-0017-5. eCollection 2018.
5
Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.消费者安全消费非理性行为及其影响因素研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 6;15(12):2764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122764.
6
Food safety knowledge, attitude and self-reported practice of secondary school students in Beijing, China: A cross-sectional study.中国北京中学生的食品安全知识、态度及自我报告行为:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187208. eCollection 2017.
7
Wine Traceability: A Data Model and Prototype in Albanian Context.葡萄酒可追溯性:阿尔巴尼亚背景下的数据模型与原型
Foods. 2016 Feb 17;5(1):11. doi: 10.3390/foods5010011.
8
Whistleblowing in the pharmaceutical industry in the United States, England, Canada, and Australia.美国、英国、加拿大和澳大利亚制药行业的举报行为。
J Public Health Policy. 2010 Apr;31(1):17-29. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2009.51.
9
Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time.积极心理资本对员工幸福感的长期影响。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2010 Jan;15(1):17-28. doi: 10.1037/a0016998.
10
Association of socioeconomic status with successful ageing: differences in the components of successful ageing.社会经济地位与成功老龄化的关联:成功老龄化各组成部分的差异
J Biosoc Sci. 2009 Mar;41(2):207-19. doi: 10.1017/S0021932008003052. Epub 2008 Oct 31.