• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会资本、政治效能感与中国居民参与食品安全治理的意愿

Social Capital, Political Efficacy and Chinese Residents' Willingness to Participate in Food Safety Governance.

机构信息

College of Economics, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China.

Research Center for Food Safety and Agriculture Green Development, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276827, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 13;19(20):13147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013147.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192013147
PMID:36293728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9603135/
Abstract

Residents play an important role as one of the main actors in food safety governance. To build a pattern of food safety risk co-governance, the positive and effective participation of residents is vital. This study first establishes a comprehensive analysis framework combining social capital theory and political efficacy theory. Data from a survey of 714 residents in Shandong Province, China, were analysed through structural equation modelling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine the causal relationship between residents' willingness to participate and its driving factors. The results indicated that: (1) reciprocity norm, institutional trust and social engagement have significant positive effects on willingness to participate; (2) political efficacy has a partial mediating effect in the relationship between social capital and willingness to participate; (3) fsQCA findings have four solutions to achieving residents' strong willingness to participate; reciprocity norm, institutional trust and political efficacy are the core elements that affected residents' high willingness to participate, whereas social engagement and sociodemographic variables are the non-core variables. Therefore, we put forward suggestions for improving residents' willingness to participate in food safety governance, including improving the appeal expression and feedback mechanism, cultivating residents' social capital and paying attention to the superposition effect of social capital and political efficacy.

摘要

居民在食品安全治理中扮演着重要角色,是主要参与者之一。为构建食品安全风险共治理模式,居民的积极有效参与至关重要。本研究首先结合社会资本理论和政治效能感理论,构建了一个全面的分析框架。通过对中国山东省 714 名居民的调查数据进行结构方程模型和模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA),检验了居民参与意愿及其驱动因素之间的因果关系。结果表明:(1)互惠规范、制度信任和社会参与对参与意愿有显著正向影响;(2)政治效能感在社会资本与参与意愿之间存在部分中介效应;(3)fsQCA 发现有四种解决方案可以实现居民强烈的参与意愿,互惠规范、制度信任和政治效能感是影响居民高参与意愿的核心要素,而社会参与和社会人口变量则是非核心要素。因此,我们提出了提高居民参与食品安全治理意愿的建议,包括完善诉求表达和反馈机制、培育居民社会资本以及关注社会资本和政治效能感的叠加效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1496/9603135/d23b1680e663/ijerph-19-13147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1496/9603135/4f8c55f3b443/ijerph-19-13147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1496/9603135/d23b1680e663/ijerph-19-13147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1496/9603135/4f8c55f3b443/ijerph-19-13147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1496/9603135/d23b1680e663/ijerph-19-13147-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Social Capital, Political Efficacy and Chinese Residents' Willingness to Participate in Food Safety Governance.社会资本、政治效能感与中国居民参与食品安全治理的意愿
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 13;19(20):13147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013147.
2
The Influence of Interpersonal Trust on Rural Residents' Willingness to Participate in Mutual Aid for the Aged: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Survey Data of Hubei and Henan Provinces.人际关系信任对农村居民参与互助养老意愿的影响:基于湖北和河南两省调查数据的实证分析。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 18;2022:2366425. doi: 10.1155/2022/2366425. eCollection 2022.
3
Residents' Behavioral Intention of Environmental Governance and Its Influencing Factors: Based on a Multidimensional Willingness Measure Perspective.居民环境治理行为意愿及其影响因素研究——基于多维意愿度测度视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;19(22):14734. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214734.
4
Exploring the Effect of Individual and Group Level Factors on the Level of Rural Residents' Domestic Waste Sorting: Evidence from Shaanxi, China.探究个体和群体因素对农村居民垃圾分类水平的影响:来自中国陕西的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;19(19):12022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912022.
5
Citizen Characteristics and Their Participation in Food Safety Social Co-governance: Public Health Implications.公民特征及其参与食品安全社会共治:公共卫生意义。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 24;9:772117. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.772117. eCollection 2021.
6
Transforming individual civic engagement into community collective efficacy: the role of bonding social capital.将个体公民参与转化为社区集体效能:联结社会资本的作用。
Am J Community Psychol. 2014 Dec;54(3-4):328-36. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9675-x.
7
Migrant Workers' Willingness to Participate in Workplace Health Promotion Programs: The Role of Interpersonal and Political Trust in China.农民工参与工作场所健康促进计划的意愿:中国人际信任和政治信任的作用。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;8:306. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00306. eCollection 2020.
8
The intermediary mechanism of social fairness perceptions between social capital and farmers' political participation: Empirical research based on masking and mediating effects.社会资本与农民政治参与之间社会公平感的中介机制:基于遮掩效应和中介效应的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1021313. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1021313. eCollection 2022.
9
A public health study on the participation mechanism of social capital in the governance of public sports space in dilapidated urban communities - a case study of Changsha City, Hunan Province.关于社会资本参与老旧城市社区公共体育空间治理的公共卫生研究——以湖南省长沙市为例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 31;11:1100137. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1100137. eCollection 2023.
10
The Impact of Social Capital on Mental Health: Evidence from the China Family Panel Survey.社会资本对心理健康的影响:来自中国家庭追踪调查的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 24;19(1):190. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010190.

引用本文的文献

1
Food Safety Governance in the Age of COVID-19: How Does Employees' Attitude on Public-Private Governance System Affect Their Willingness to Blow the Whistle on Food Violations?新冠疫情时代的食品安全治理:员工对公私治理体系的态度如何影响他们举报食品违规行为的意愿?
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 5;11(2):167. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020167.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral predictors of household food-safety practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Extending the theory of planned behavior.新冠疫情期间家庭食品安全行为的行为预测因素:扩展计划行为理论
Food Control. 2022 Apr;134:108719. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108719. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
2
Citizen Characteristics and Their Participation in Food Safety Social Co-governance: Public Health Implications.公民特征及其参与食品安全社会共治:公共卫生意义。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 24;9:772117. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.772117. eCollection 2021.
3
Social-Psychological Context Moderates Incentives to Co-produce: Evidence from a Large-Scale Survey Experiment on Park Upkeep in an Urban Setting.
社会心理背景调节共同生产的激励因素:来自城市环境中公园维护的大规模调查实验的证据。
Public Adm Rev. 2021 Sep-Oct;81(5):935-950. doi: 10.1111/puar.13340. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
Development and Validation of a Questionnaire on Consumer Psychological Capital in Food Safety Social Co-governance.食品安全社会共治中消费者心理资本问卷的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 7;11:584810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584810. eCollection 2020.
5
Investigating the relationships between social capital, chronic health conditions and health status among Australian adults: findings from an Australian national cohort survey.探究澳大利亚成年人社会资本、慢性健康状况与健康状况之间的关系:一项澳大利亚全国队列调查的结果
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 14;20(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8370-0.
6
Social capital as a key determinant of perceived benefits of community-based marine protected areas.社会资本作为基于社区的海洋保护区感知效益的关键决定因素。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Apr;31(2):311-321. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12808. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
7
Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.同样的游戏,不同的规则?政治参与中的性别差异。
Sex Roles. 2010 Mar;62(5-6):318-333. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
8
Social capital and the collective management of resources.社会资本与资源的集体管理
Science. 2003 Dec 12;302(5652):1912-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1090847.
9
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.