Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2020;13(4):321-342.
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the histological healing outcomes at the bone–titanium interface of loaded and unloaded dental implants placed in humans. Materials and methods: An electronic search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) databases up to and including April 2020 to identify clinical trials reporting human histological data of bone healing around titanium dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges. The search was conducted by two independent reviewers with no language restrictions. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s domain-based, two-part tool. Results: Of the 4564 potentially eligible articles, only 25 were included in this systematic review (13 randomised and 12 controlled clinical trials), with a total of 548 micro/transitional implants evaluated. The marked heterogeneity between studies did not allow the data to be combined for meta-analyses. In general, based on mean values of bone-to-implant contact (range 9% to 73%), bone density outside the threaded area (range 14.9% to 31.6%), bone density in the threaded area (range 17.9% to 56.9%) and osteocyte index (range 19.79 to 37.88 cells/mm2), all implant surface modifications demonstrated osseointegration potential. Furthermore, immediate loading was related to higher bone-to-implant contact, bone density outside the threaded area and osteocyte index; longer healing periods to higher bone-to-implant contact; and smoking to lower bone-to-implant contact, bone density in the threaded area and bone density outside the threaded area. Conclusions: Despite the fact that several modifications were made to the implant surface, when considering the values for bone-to-implant contact, bone density in the threaded area, bone density outside the threaded area and osteocyte index, machined surfaces showed the worst healing outcomes. Nevertheless, osseointegration was improved by both immediate loading and longer healing periods and worsened by smoking.
本系统评价的目的是评估负载和未负载的牙种植体在人体中植入时,骨-钛界面的组织学愈合结果。
使用电子检索系统 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(Central),对截至 2020 年 4 月的临床研究进行检索,以确定报告钛牙科种植体周围骨愈合的人类组织学数据的临床试验。检索由两名独立的审查员进行,无语言限制。使用 Cochrane 协作基于领域的、两部分工具评估每个纳入研究的偏倚风险。
在 4564 篇潜在合格文章中,只有 25 篇被纳入本系统评价(13 项随机对照试验和 12 项对照临床试验),共评估了 548 个微/过渡种植体。由于研究之间存在显著的异质性,因此无法对数据进行合并进行荟萃分析。一般来说,根据骨-种植体接触的平均值(范围为 9%至 73%)、螺纹区域外的骨密度(范围为 14.9%至 31.6%)、螺纹区域内的骨密度(范围为 17.9%至 56.9%)和骨细胞指数(范围为 19.79 至 37.88 个细胞/mm2),所有种植体表面改性均显示出骨整合潜力。此外,即刻负载与更高的骨-种植体接触、螺纹区域外的骨密度和骨细胞指数有关;更长的愈合期与更高的骨-种植体接触有关;吸烟与较低的骨-种植体接触、螺纹区域内的骨密度和螺纹区域外的骨密度有关。
尽管对种植体表面进行了多种改性,但考虑到骨-种植体接触、螺纹区域内的骨密度、螺纹区域外的骨密度和骨细胞指数的值,机械加工表面显示出最差的愈合结果。然而,即刻负载和更长的愈合期均可改善骨整合,而吸烟则会恶化骨整合。