Suppr超能文献

注意差距:沉浸式虚拟环境中儿童、青少年和成年人的差距可供性判断

Mind the Gap: Gap Affordance Judgments of Children, Teens, and Adults in an Immersive Virtual Environment.

作者信息

Creem-Regehr Sarah H, Gill Devin M, Pointon Grant D, Bodenheimer Bobby, Stefanucci Jeanine K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2019 Oct 15;6:96. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00096. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Affordances are possibilities for action that depend on both an observer's capabilities and the properties of the environment. Immersive Virtual Environments (IVEs) have been used to examine affordances in adults, demonstrating that judgments about action capabilities are made similarly to the real world. However, less is known about affordance judgments in middle-aged children and adolescents in IVEs. Differences in rate of growth, decision criteria, and perceived risk could influence affordance judgments for children. In Experiment 1, children, teens, and adults stood in an IVE at ground level or at a height of 15 m, and were asked to view gaps of different widths. Across all age groups, estimates of gap crossing were underestimated at the higher height compared to the ground, consistent with reports of fear and risk of falling. Children, compared to adults, underestimated their maximum crossable gap compared to their actual crossable gap. To test whether this difference was specific to IVEs or a more generalized age effect, children and adults were tested on gap estimates in the real world in Experiment 2. This real world study showed no difference between children and adults, suggesting a unique contribution of the IVE to children's affordance judgments. We discuss the implications for using IVEs to study children's affordances.

摘要

可供性是取决于观察者能力和环境属性的行动可能性。沉浸式虚拟环境(IVEs)已被用于研究成年人的可供性,结果表明对行动能力的判断与现实世界相似。然而,对于中年儿童和青少年在IVEs中的可供性判断,我们了解得较少。生长速度、决策标准和感知风险的差异可能会影响儿童的可供性判断。在实验1中,儿童、青少年和成年人站在IVEs中的地面或15米高处,被要求观察不同宽度的间隙。在所有年龄组中,与地面相比,在较高高度时对跨越间隙的估计被低估,这与恐惧和跌倒风险的报告一致。与成年人相比,儿童低估了他们的最大可跨越间隙与实际可跨越间隙的比例。为了测试这种差异是IVEs特有的还是更普遍的年龄效应,在实验2中对儿童和成年人在现实世界中的间隙估计进行了测试。这项现实世界研究表明儿童和成年人之间没有差异,这表明IVEs对儿童的可供性判断有独特的影响。我们讨论了使用IVEs研究儿童可供性的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9c/7805896/2a5ef3641018/frobt-06-00096-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验