• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤患者使用外骨骼辅助行走的移动技能:一项三中心随机临床试验的结果

Mobility Skills With Exoskeletal-Assisted Walking in Persons With SCI: Results From a Three Center Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Hong EunKyoung, Gorman Peter H, Forrest Gail F, Asselin Pierre K, Knezevic Steven, Scott William, Wojciehowski Sandra Buffy, Kornfeld Stephen, Spungen Ann M

机构信息

Spinal Cord Damage Research Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States.

Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2020 Aug 4;7:93. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00093. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2020.00093
PMID:33501260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7805715/
Abstract

Clinical exoskeletal-assisted walking (EAW) programs for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) have been established, but many unknown variables remain. These include addressing staffing needs, determining the number of sessions needed to achieve a successful walking velocity milestone for ambulation, distinguishing potential achievement goals according to level of injury, and deciding the number of sessions participants need to perform in order to meet the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria for personal use prescription in the home and community. The primary aim of this study was to determine the number of sessions necessary to achieve adequate EAW skills and velocity milestones, and the percentage of participants able to achieve these skills by 12 sessions and to determine the skill progression over the course of 36 sessions. A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted across three sites, in persons with chronic (≥6 months) non-ambulatory SCI. Eligible participants were randomized (within site) to either the EAW arm first (Group 1), three times per week for 36 sessions, striving to be completed in 12 weeks or the usual activity arm (UA) first (Group 2), followed by a crossover to the other arm for both groups. The 10-meter walk test seconds (s) (10MWT), 6-min walk test meters (m) (6MWT), and the Timed-Up-and-Go (s) (TUG) were performed at 12, 24, and 36 sessions. To test walking performance in the exoskeletal devices, nominal velocities and distance milestones were chosen prior to study initiation, and were used for the 10MWT (≤ 40s), 6MWT (≥80m), and TUG (≤ 90s). All walking tests were performed with the exoskeletons. A total of 50 participants completed 36 sessions of EAW training. At 12 sessions, 31 (62%), 35 (70%), and 36 (72%) participants achieved the 10MWT, 6MWT, and TUG milestones, respectively. By 36 sessions, 40 (80%), 41 (82%), and 42 (84%) achieved the 10MWT, 6MWT, and TUG criteria, respectively. It is feasible to train chronic non-ambulatory individuals with SCI in performance of EAW sufficiently to achieve reasonable mobility skill outcome milestones.

摘要

针对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的临床外骨骼辅助行走(EAW)项目已经建立,但仍存在许多未知变量。这些变量包括满足人员配备需求、确定实现成功行走速度里程碑以进行步行所需的训练次数、根据损伤程度区分潜在的成就目标,以及确定参与者为满足美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关于家庭和社区个人使用处方的标准需要进行的训练次数。本研究的主要目的是确定实现足够的EAW技能和速度里程碑所需的训练次数,以及在12次训练时能够实现这些技能的参与者百分比,并确定在36次训练过程中的技能进展情况。在三个地点对患有慢性(≥6个月)非步行性SCI的患者进行了一项随机临床试验(RCT)。符合条件的参与者(在各地点内)被随机分为先接受EAW训练组(第1组),每周三次,共36次训练,力争在12周内完成;或先接受常规活动组(UA)(第2组),然后两组交叉到另一组。在第12、24和36次训练时进行10米步行测试秒数(s)(10MWT)、6分钟步行测试米数(m)(6MWT)和定时起立行走测试秒数(s)(TUG)。为了测试外骨骼设备中的行走性能,在研究开始前选择了名义速度和距离里程碑,并用于10MWT(≤40s)、6MWT(≥80m)和TUG(≤90s)。所有步行测试均使用外骨骼进行。共有50名参与者完成了36次EAW训练。在12次训练时,分别有31名(62%)、35名(70%)和36名(72%)参与者达到了10MWT、6MWT和TUG里程碑。到36次训练时,分别有40名(80%)、41名(82%)和42名(84%)达到了10MWT、6MWT和TUG标准。对患有慢性非步行性SCI的个体进行EAW训练,使其充分实现合理的移动技能成果里程碑是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5661/7805715/7c14012f10ca/frobt-07-00093-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5661/7805715/83442e6c0ea7/frobt-07-00093-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5661/7805715/3add4b006ba3/frobt-07-00093-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5661/7805715/804ee1cc8ee6/frobt-07-00093-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5661/7805715/6e339540c9fc/frobt-07-00093-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5661/7805715/7c14012f10ca/frobt-07-00093-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5661/7805715/83442e6c0ea7/frobt-07-00093-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5661/7805715/3add4b006ba3/frobt-07-00093-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5661/7805715/804ee1cc8ee6/frobt-07-00093-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5661/7805715/6e339540c9fc/frobt-07-00093-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5661/7805715/7c14012f10ca/frobt-07-00093-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Mobility Skills With Exoskeletal-Assisted Walking in Persons With SCI: Results From a Three Center Randomized Clinical Trial.脊髓损伤患者使用外骨骼辅助行走的移动技能:一项三中心随机临床试验的结果
Front Robot AI. 2020 Aug 4;7:93. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00093. eCollection 2020.
2
Assessment of In-Hospital Walking Velocity and Level of Assistance in a Powered Exoskeleton in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤患者使用动力外骨骼时的院内步行速度及辅助水平评估
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Spring;21(2):100-9. doi: 10.1310/sci2102-100. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
3
Exoskeletal-Assisted Walking in Veterans With Paralysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.外骨骼辅助行走对瘫痪退伍军人的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2431501. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31501.
4
Exoskeletal-Assisted Walking During Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation Enhances Recovery for Persons with Spinal Cord Injury-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.外骨骼辅助行走在急性住院康复期间增强了脊髓损伤患者的恢复-一项初步随机对照试验。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Sep;41(17-18):2089-2100. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0667. Epub 2024 May 8.
5
Erratum.勘误
Mult Scler. 2016 Oct;22(12):NP9-NP11. doi: 10.1177/1352458515585718. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
Exoskeletal-assisted walking combined with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation to improve bone health in persons with spinal cord injury: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial.外骨骼辅助行走结合经皮脊髓电刺激改善脊髓损伤患者的骨骼健康:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 17;14(9):e086062. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086062.
7
Exoskeleton-assisted walking improves pulmonary function and walking parameters among individuals with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled pilot study.外骨骼辅助行走可改善脊髓损伤患者的肺功能和行走参数:一项随机对照初步研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 May 24;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00880-w.
8
The Safety and Feasibility of Exoskeletal-Assisted Walking in Acute Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury.外骨骼辅助行走在脊髓损伤后急性康复中的安全性和可行性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;101(1):113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
9
Gait Training with Robotic Exoskeleton Assisted Rehabilitation System in Patients with Incomplete Traumatic and Non-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study and Review of Literature.使用机器人外骨骼辅助康复系统对创伤性和非创伤性不完全性脊髓损伤患者进行步态训练:一项初步研究及文献综述
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2023 Jan;26(Suppl 1):S26-S31. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_1075_21. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
10
Hybrid Assistive Limb Exoskeleton HAL in the Rehabilitation of Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: Proof of Concept; the Results in 21 Patients.混合辅助肢体外骨骼HAL在慢性脊髓损伤康复中的应用:概念验证;21例患者的结果
World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;110:e73-e78. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.080. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Hip, knee, and ankle joint forces during exoskeletal-assisted walking: Comparison of approaches to simulate human-robot interactions.外骨骼辅助行走过程中的髋、膝和踝关节受力:模拟人机交互方法的比较。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0322247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322247. eCollection 2025.
2
Exoskeletal-Assisted Walking in Veterans With Paralysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.外骨骼辅助行走对瘫痪退伍军人的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2431501. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31501.
3
Recommendations for clinical decision-making when offering exoskeletons for community use in individuals with spinal cord injury.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiorespiratory demand and rate of perceived exertion during overground walking with a robotic exoskeleton in long-term manual wheelchair users with chronic spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.长期使用手动轮椅的慢性脊髓损伤患者穿戴外骨骼机器人进行地面行走时的心肺需求和感知用力率:一项横断面研究。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jul;61(4):215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Gait training after spinal cord injury: safety, feasibility and gait function following 8 weeks of training with the exoskeletons from Ekso Bionics.脊髓损伤后的步态训练:使用 Ekso Bionics 的外骨骼进行 8 周训练后的安全性、可行性和步态功能。
Spinal Cord. 2018 Feb;56(2):106-116. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0013-7. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
3
为脊髓损伤个体提供社区使用的外骨骼时临床决策的建议。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Aug 14;5:1428708. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1428708. eCollection 2024.
4
Impact of Robotic-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury Patients on Outcome Measure.机器人辅助步态训练对亚急性脊髓损伤患者结局指标的影响。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 5;13(11):1966. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111966.
5
A systematic review of the determinants of implementation of a locomotor training program using a powered exoskeleton for individuals with a spinal cord injury.使用动力外骨骼对脊髓损伤患者进行运动训练方案的实施决定因素的系统评价。
Clin Rehabil. 2023 Aug;37(8):1119-1138. doi: 10.1177/02692155231164092. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
6
Comparison of the dynamics of exoskeletal-assisted and unassisted locomotion in an FDA-approved lower extremity device: Controlled experiments and development of a subject-specific virtual simulator.在 FDA 批准的下肢设备中,比较外骨骼辅助和非辅助运动的动力学:对照实验和基于个体的虚拟模拟器的开发。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0270078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270078. eCollection 2023.
7
TWIICE One powered exoskeleton: effect of design improvements on usability in daily life as measured by the performance in the CYBATHLON race.TWIICE One 动力外骨骼:通过在 CYBATHLON 竞赛中的表现衡量,设计改进对日常生活中可用性的影响。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Jun 27;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01028-0.
8
Restoration of complex movement in the paralyzed upper limb.瘫痪上肢复杂运动的恢复。
J Neural Eng. 2022 Jul 1;19(4). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac7ad7.
9
Comparison of Efficacy of Lokomat and Wearable Exoskeleton-Assisted Gait Training in People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.脊髓损伤患者中Lokomat与可穿戴外骨骼辅助步态训练的疗效比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 13;13:772660. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.772660. eCollection 2022.
10
Closed-Loop Torque and Kinematic Control of a Hybrid Lower-Limb Exoskeleton for Treadmill Walking.用于跑步机行走的混合式下肢外骨骼的闭环扭矩和运动控制
Front Robot AI. 2022 Jan 20;8:702860. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.702860. eCollection 2021.
Training Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Ambulate Using a Powered Exoskeleton.训练脊髓损伤患者使用动力外骨骼行走。
J Vis Exp. 2016 Jun 16(112):54071. doi: 10.3791/54071.
4
Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and correlational study.脊髓损伤后使用动力机器人外骨骼的步态速度:系统评价与相关性研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Oct 14;12:82. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0074-9.
5
Acute Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Responses During Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking Overground Among Persons with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.慢性脊髓损伤患者在地面行走时外骨骼辅助下的急性心肺和代谢反应
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Spring;21(2):122-32. doi: 10.1310/sci2102-122. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
6
Heart rate and oxygen demand of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with paraplegia.截瘫患者在动力外骨骼辅助行走时的心率与氧需求
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(2):147-58. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.02.0060.
7
Walking speed: the functional vital sign.步行速度:功能性生命体征。
J Aging Phys Act. 2015 Apr;23(2):314-22. doi: 10.1123/japa.2013-0236. Epub 2014 May 2.
8
Impact of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life and well-being of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review protocol.质量改进策略对脊髓损伤个体生活质量和幸福感的影响:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 22;2:14. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-14.
9
Spinal cord injury and quality of life: a systematic review of outcome measures.脊髓损伤与生活质量:结局指标的系统评价
Evid Based Spine Care J. 2011 Feb;2(1):37-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267085.
10
Males aging with a spinal cord injury: prevalence of cardiovascular and metabolic conditions.男性随着脊髓损伤而衰老:心血管和代谢状况的流行率。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;93(1):90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.201.