Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Caulfield Pain Management and Research Centre, Caulfield Hospital, Caulfield, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 27;16(1):e0245636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245636. eCollection 2021.
Road traffic injuries are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Understanding circumstances leading to road traffic injury is crucial to improve road safety, and implement countermeasures to reduce the incidence and severity of road trauma. We aimed to characterise crash characteristics of road traffic collisions in Victoria, Australia, and to examine the relationship between crash characteristics and fault attribution. Data were extracted from the Victorian State Trauma Registry for motor vehicle drivers, motorcyclists, pedal cyclists and pedestrians with a no-fault compensation claim, aged > = 16 years and injured 2010-2016. People with intentional injury, serious head injury, no compensation claim/missing injury event description or who died < = 12-months post-injury were excluded, resulting in a sample of 2,486. Text mining of the injury event using QDA Miner and Wordstat was used to classify crash circumstances for each road user group. Crashes in which no other was at fault included circumstances involving lost control or avoiding a hazard, mechanical failure or medical conditions. Collisions in which another was predominantly at fault occurred at intersections with another vehicle entering from an adjacent direction, and head-on collisions. Crashes with higher prevalence of unknown fault included multi-vehicle collisions, pedal cyclists injured in rear-end collisions, and pedestrians hit while crossing the road or navigating slow traffic areas. We discuss several methods to promote road safety and to reduce the incidence and severity of road traffic injuries. Our recommendations take into consideration the incidence and impact of road trauma for different types of road users, and include engineering and infrastructure controls through to interventions targeting or accommodating human behaviour.
道路交通事故是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。了解导致道路交通事故的情况对于改善道路安全和实施减少道路创伤发生率和严重程度的对策至关重要。我们旨在描述澳大利亚维多利亚州道路交通事故的碰撞特征,并研究碰撞特征与过错归因之间的关系。数据取自维多利亚州创伤登记处,用于调查 2010 年至 2016 年期间无过错补偿索赔的机动车驾驶员、摩托车驾驶员、自行车骑手和行人的事故。排除了有蓄意伤害、严重头部受伤、无补偿索赔/缺失伤害事件描述或受伤后 12 个月内死亡的人员,最终样本量为 2486 人。使用 QDA Miner 和 Wordstat 对伤害事件进行文本挖掘,以对每个道路使用者群体的碰撞情况进行分类。无他人过错的事故包括失去控制或避让危险、机械故障或医疗状况的情况。另一人主要有过错的碰撞发生在与另一辆车从相邻方向进入的交叉口,以及正面碰撞。过错不明的碰撞更常见的情况包括多车碰撞、被追尾的自行车骑手、在过马路或在慢行交通区域行驶时被撞的行人。我们讨论了几种促进道路安全和减少道路交通事故发生率和严重程度的方法。我们的建议考虑了不同类型道路使用者的道路创伤发生率和影响,包括工程和基础设施控制以及针对或适应人类行为的干预措施。