Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 时期院外心脏骤停患者复苏终止的多模态规则的外部验证。

External validation of multimodal termination of resuscitation rules for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in the COVID-19 era.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 680, Gukchaebosang-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 27;29(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00834-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Futile resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 era can lead to risk of disease transmission and unnecessary transport. Various existing basic or advanced life support (BLS or ALS, respectively) rules for the termination of resuscitation (TOR) have been derived and validated in North America and Asian countries. This study aimed to evaluate the external validation of these rules in predicting the survival outcomes of OHCA patients in the COVID-19 era.

METHODS

This was a multicenter observational study using the WinCOVID-19 Daegu registry data collected during February 18-March 31, 2020. The subjects were patients who showed cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac etiology. The outcomes of each rule were compared to the actual patient survival outcomes. The sensitivity, specificity, false positive value (FPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) of each TOR rule were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 170 of the 184 OHCA patients were eligible and evaluated. TOR was recommended for 122 patients based on the international basic life support termination of resuscitation (BLS-TOR) rule, which showed 85% specificity, 74% sensitivity, 0.8% FPV, and 99% PPV for predicting unfavorable survival outcomes. When the traditional BLS-TOR rules and KoCARC TOR rule II were applied to our registry, one patient met the TOR criteria but survived at hospital discharge. With regard to the FPV (upper limit of 95% confidence interval < 5%), specificity (100%), and PPV (> 99%) criteria, only the KoCARC TOR rule I, which included a combination of three factors including not being witnessed by emergency medical technicians, presenting with an asystole at the scene, and not experiencing prehospital shock delivery or return of spontaneous circulation, was found to be superior to all other TOR rules.

CONCLUSION

Among the previous nine BLS and ALS TOR rules, KoCARC TOR rule I was most suitable for predicting poor survival outcomes and showed improved diagnostic performance. Further research on variations in resources and treatment protocols among facilities, regions, and cultures will be useful in determining the feasibility of TOR rules for COVID-19 patients worldwide.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情时代,对院外心搏骤停(OHCA)患者进行无效复苏可能会导致疾病传播和不必要的转运风险。北美和亚洲国家已经制定并验证了各种现有的基本或高级生命支持(BLS 或 ALS)复苏终止(TOR)规则。本研究旨在评估这些规则在预测 COVID-19 时代 OHCA 患者生存结局方面的外部验证。

方法

这是一项多中心观察性研究,使用 2020 年 2 月 18 日至 3 月 31 日期间收集的大邱 WinCOVID-19 登记数据。研究对象为出现疑似心源性心搏骤停的患者。将每种规则的结果与实际患者的生存结局进行比较。评估了每种 TOR 规则的敏感性、特异性、假阳性值(FPV)和阳性预测值(PPV)。

结果

总共对 184 例 OHCA 患者中的 170 例进行了评估。根据国际基本生命支持终止复苏(BLS-TOR)规则,建议对 122 例患者进行 TOR,该规则对预测不良生存结局的特异性为 85%、敏感性为 74%、FPV 为 0.8%、PPV 为 99%。当传统的 BLS-TOR 规则和 KoCARC TOR 规则 II 应用于我们的登记处时,一名符合 TOR 标准但在出院时存活的患者。根据 FPV(95%置信区间上限 < 5%)、特异性(100%)和 PPV(> 99%)标准,只有 KoCARC TOR 规则 I 是最佳的,它包括三个因素的组合,包括未被急救人员目击、现场出现心搏骤停以及未经历院前休克输送或自主循环恢复。

结论

在之前的九个 BLS 和 ALS TOR 规则中,KoCARC TOR 规则 I 最适合预测不良生存结局,并显示出改进的诊断性能。对设施、地区和文化之间资源和治疗方案的差异进行进一步研究,将有助于确定全球范围内 COVID-19 患者 TOR 规则的可行性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6467/7839198/aafc22f3a5fd/13049_2021_834_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验