• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大女性生殖器官切割预防和护理方案的成本和影响:所需资源估计数及其对发病率和流行率的影响。

Cost and impact of scaling up female genital mutilation prevention and care programs:  Estimated resource requirements and impact on incidence and prevalence.

机构信息

UNFPA, New York, NY, United States of America.

Avenir Health, Takoma Park, MD, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0244946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244946. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0244946
PMID:33507900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7842986/
Abstract

PURPOSE

SDG 5.3 targets include eliminating harmful practices such as Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). Limited information is available about levels of investment needed and realistic estimates of potential incidence change. In this work, we estimate the cost and impact of FGM programs in 31 high burden countries.

METHODS

This analysis combines program data, secondary data analysis, and population-level costing methods to estimate cost and impact of high and moderate scaleup of FGM programs between 2020 and 2030. Cost per person or community reached was multiplied by populations to estimate costs, and regression analysis was used to estimate new incidence rates, which were applied to populations to estimate cases averted.

RESULTS

Reaching the high-coverage targets for 31 countries by 2030 would require an investment of US$ 3.3 billion. This scenario would avert more than 24 million cases of FGM, at an average cost of US$ 134 per case averted. A moderate-coverage scenario would cost US$ 1.6 billion and avert more than 12 million cases of FGM. However, average cost per case averted hides substantial variation based on country dynamics. The most cost-effective investment would be in countries with limited historic change in FGM incidence, with the average cost per case averted between US$ 3 and US$ 90. The next most effective would be those with high approval for FGM, but a preexisting trend downward, where cost per case averted is estimated at around US$ 240.

INTERPRETATION

This analysis shows that although data on FGM is limited, we can draw useful findings from population-level surveys and program data to guide resource mobilization and program planning.

摘要

目的

SDG5.3 的目标包括消除女性外阴残割等有害习俗。目前有关所需投资水平和潜在发病率变化的现实估计的信息有限。在这项工作中,我们估计了 31 个高负担国家的外阴残割方案的成本和影响。

方法

本分析结合了项目数据、二次数据分析和人群成本核算方法,以估计 2020 年至 2030 年高规模和中等规模扩大外阴残割方案的成本和影响。将达到的人均或社区成本乘以人口数来估算成本,并使用回归分析来估计新的发病率,将其应用于人口数来估计可预防的病例数。

结果

到 2030 年,要达到 31 个国家的高覆盖率目标,需要投资 33 亿美元。这一方案将避免 2400 多万例女性外阴残割,平均每例避免成本为 134 美元。中规模方案需要投资 16 亿美元,可避免 1200 多万例女性外阴残割。然而,每例避免的平均成本掩盖了基于国家动态的巨大差异。在女性外阴残割发病率变化有限的国家进行最具成本效益的投资,每例避免的平均成本在 3 至 90 美元之间。其次是那些对女性外阴残割有高度认可,但已有下降趋势的国家,每例避免的成本估计在 240 美元左右。

解释

本分析表明,尽管女性外阴残割的数据有限,但我们可以从人群水平调查和项目数据中得出有用的发现,以指导资源调动和方案规划。

相似文献

1
Cost and impact of scaling up female genital mutilation prevention and care programs:  Estimated resource requirements and impact on incidence and prevalence.扩大女性生殖器官切割预防和护理方案的成本和影响:所需资源估计数及其对发病率和流行率的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0244946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244946. eCollection 2021.
2
Economic burden of female genital mutilation in 27 high-prevalence countries.27 个高流行国家女性生殖器官切割的经济负担。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb;7(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004512.
3
Combating female genital mutilation: an agenda for the next decade.打击女性生殖器切割:未来十年的议程。
World Health Stat Q. 1996;49(2):142-7.
4
Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Netherlands: a comparison between a nationwide survey in midwifery practices and extrapolation-model.荷兰女性生殖器切割估计:产科学实践全国调查与外推模型比较。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):1033. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09151-0.
5
Female genital mutilation: trends, economic burden of delay and basis for public health interventions.女性生殖器官切割:趋势、延迟的经济负担和公共卫生干预的依据。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Apr 15;23(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02140-4.
6
Using electronic maternity records to estimate female genital mutilation in Lothian from 2010 to 2013.利用电子产妇记录估计 2010 年至 2013 年洛锡安区的女性外阴残割情况。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Aug 1;28(4):657-661. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky045.
7
Preventing female genital mutilation in high income countries: a systematic review of the evidence.高收入国家预防女性生殖器官切割:证据的系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jul 22;16(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0774-x.
8
Trends in female genital mutilation/cutting in Senegal: what can we learn from successive household surveys in sub-Saharan African countries?塞内加尔女性生殖器切割趋势:我们能从撒哈拉以南非洲国家的连续家庭调查中学到什么?
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jan 30;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0907-9.
9
Lessons learnt in scaling up evidence-based comprehensive health sector responses addressing female genital mutilation in highly prevalent settings.在高度流行地区扩大基于证据的全面卫生部门应对女性生殖器官切割做法的经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jun;8(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012270.
10
Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland.欧盟、挪威和瑞士第一代遭受女性生殖器切割的妇女和女孩的估计数。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016 Dec;21(6):474-482. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1234597. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic burden of female genital mutilation in 27 high-prevalence countries.27 个高流行国家女性生殖器官切割的经济负担。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb;7(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004512.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency-dependent female genital cutting behaviour confers evolutionary fitness benefits.频率依赖性女性生殖器切割行为赋予进化适应性益处。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Feb 6;1(3):49. doi: 10.1038/s41559-016-0049.
2
Improving Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review of Potential Interventions.改善青少年性与生殖健康:潜在干预措施的系统评价
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Oct;59(4S):S11-S28. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.05.022.
3
Prevention of violence against women and girls: what does the evidence say?预防暴力侵害妇女和女孩行为:现有证据说明了什么?
Lancet. 2015 Apr 18;385(9977):1555-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61703-7. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
4
A realist synthesis of controlled studies to determine the effectiveness of interventions to prevent genital cutting of girls.一项关于对照研究的现实主义综合分析,以确定预防女孩生殖器切割干预措施的有效性。
Paediatr Int Child Health. 2013 Nov;33(4):322-33. doi: 10.1179/2046905513Y.0000000086.
5
Exploration of pathways related to the decline in female circumcision in Egypt.探讨与埃及女性割礼减少相关的途径。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 3;13:921. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-921.
6
What works and what does not: a discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of female genital mutilation.哪些方法可行,哪些不可行:关于摒弃女性生殖器切割习俗常用方法的探讨
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:348248. doi: 10.1155/2013/348248. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
7
Health consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Gambia, evidence into action.冈比亚女性生殖器切割/割礼的健康后果,证据转化为行动。
Reprod Health. 2011 Oct 3;8:26. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-8-26.
8
Dynamics of change in the practice of female genital cutting in Senegambia: testing predictions of social convention theory.塞内冈比亚女性生殖器切割实践变化的动态:社会规范理论预测的检验。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(8):1275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.022. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
9
Multivariate causal attribution and cost-effectiveness of a national mass media campaign in the Philippines.菲律宾一项全国性大众媒体宣传活动的多变量因果归因及成本效益
J Health Commun. 2006;11 Suppl 2:69-90. doi: 10.1080/10810730600974522.