• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创造性适应能力:危机时期的概念框架、测量方法及结果

Creative Adaptability: Conceptual Framework, Measurement, and Outcomes in Times of Crisis.

作者信息

Orkibi Hod

机构信息

Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:588172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588172. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588172
PMID:33510671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7835130/
Abstract

This article presents the framework and explores the measurement, correlates, and outcomes of creative adaptability (CA), proposed here as the cognitive-behavioral-emotional ability to respond creatively and adaptively to stressful situations. Data collection was in April 2020, during the peak of the outbreak of the Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in Israel. In Study 1, a sample of 310 adults completed the newly developed CA scale, as well as spontaneity, openness to experience, creative self-efficacy, and well-being measurements. The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses corroborated the 9-item CA scale's theorized underlying construct. The scale's validity and reliability were also supported. Exploratory analyses suggested that the association between CA and well-being was mediated by creative self-efficacy and that CA may buffer the impact of individuals' concern about Coronavirus on their well-being. In Study 2, short-term longitudinal data based on a sample of 71 students suggested that CA may predict lower psychological stress over time. Support for the CA scale's internal consistency reliability was obtained and its test-retest reliability was established. Overall, the results shed light on this new construct as a potential protective factor. Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed.

摘要

本文介绍了该框架,并探讨了创造性适应能力(CA)的测量方法、相关因素及结果。这里将创造性适应能力定义为对压力情境做出创造性和适应性反应的认知-行为-情感能力。数据收集于2020年4月,当时以色列正处于冠状病毒大流行(COVID-19)的高峰期。在研究1中,310名成年人组成的样本完成了新开发的CA量表,以及自发性、经验开放性、创造性自我效能感和幸福感测量。探索性和验证性因素分析的结果证实了9项CA量表的理论基础结构。该量表的有效性和可靠性也得到了支持。探索性分析表明,CA与幸福感之间的关联由创造性自我效能感介导,并且CA可能缓冲个体对冠状病毒的担忧对其幸福感的影响。在研究2中,基于71名学生样本的短期纵向数据表明,随着时间的推移,CA可能预测较低的心理压力。获得了对CA量表内部一致性可靠性的支持,并确立了其重测可靠性。总体而言,研究结果揭示了这一新概念作为一种潜在保护因素的情况。本文还讨论了其对理论、研究和实践的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a18b/7835130/ba67efb11c20/fpsyg-11-588172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a18b/7835130/0546caab6e99/fpsyg-11-588172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a18b/7835130/ba67efb11c20/fpsyg-11-588172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a18b/7835130/0546caab6e99/fpsyg-11-588172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a18b/7835130/ba67efb11c20/fpsyg-11-588172-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Creative Adaptability: Conceptual Framework, Measurement, and Outcomes in Times of Crisis.创造性适应能力:危机时期的概念框架、测量方法及结果
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:588172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588172. eCollection 2020.
2
Measuring Creative Self-Efficacy: An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Creative Self-Efficacy Scale.测量创造性自我效能感:创造性自我效能量表的项目反应理论分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 1;12:678033. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678033. eCollection 2021.
3
Adaptation and Validation of the Basque Version of the Emotional Creativity Inventory in Higher Education.《高等教育中情感创造力量表巴斯克语版本的改编与验证》
Span J Psychol. 2016 Jun 3;19:E33. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.26.
4
Developing a valid and reliable Self-Efficacy in Clinical Performance scale.开发一个有效且可靠的临床操作自我效能感量表。
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Jun;56(2):214-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00685.x.
5
Psychometric Properties of Creative Self-Efficacy Inventory Among Distinguished Students in Saudi Arabian Universities.沙特阿拉伯大学优秀学生创造性自我效能感量表的心理测量学特性
Psychol Rep. 2016 Jun;118(3):902-17. doi: 10.1177/0033294116646021. Epub 2016 May 2.
6
The Multidimensional Orientation Toward Dying and Death Inventory (MODDI-F): Factorial Validity and Reliability in a U.S. Sample.多维濒死与死亡取向量表(MODDI-F):美国样本中的因素效度与信度
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jun;51(6):1062-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.322. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
7
Validation and Psychometric Evaluation of the COVID-19 Risk Perception Scale (CoRP): a New Brief Scale to Measure Individuals' Risk Perception.新型冠状病毒肺炎风险感知量表(CoRP)的效度验证与心理测量学评估:一种测量个体风险感知的新型简短量表
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021 Sep 27:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11469-021-00660-6.
8
Development and initial validation of the appropriate antibiotic use self-efficacy scale.适当抗生素使用自我效能感量表的编制及初步验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Oct;101(10):1838-1845. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.05.020. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
9
Translation and validation of a Chinese version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale with undergraduate nursing trainees.华威-爱丁堡心理健康量表中文版在本科护理实习生中的翻译与验证
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Nov;23(9-10):554-560. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12344.
10
A Reconsideration of the Self-Compassion Scale's Total Score: Self-Compassion versus Self-Criticism.对自我同情量表总分的重新思考:自我同情与自我批评
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0132940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132940. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
META-Measurement for Evolution, Transformation, and Autorealization: A New Assessment Protocol.用于进化、转变和自我实现的元测量:一种新的评估方案。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;15(7):942. doi: 10.3390/bs15070942.
2
Responsible leadership and employee creativity: a moderated mediation model based on social cognitive and situational strength theories.负责任的领导与员工创造力:基于社会认知和情境强度理论的调节中介模型
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 9;13(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03110-3.
3
Diversity of Group Memberships Predicts Well-Being: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evidence.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological adjustment during the global outbreak of COVID-19: A resilience perspective.新冠疫情期间的心理调适:韧性视角
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S51-S54. doi: 10.1037/tra0000685. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
2
Mental health stressors in Israel during the coronavirus pandemic.以色列冠状病毒大流行期间的心理健康压力源。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Jul;12(5):499-501. doi: 10.1037/tra0000864. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic.心理健康与新冠疫情
群体成员身份的多样性预示着幸福感:横断面研究与纵向研究证据
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 May;51(5):716-729. doi: 10.1177/01461672231202278. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
4
Portuguese Version of the Ageing Attitudes Questionnaire (AAQ): Validation of the Psychometric Properties.《老化态度问卷(AAQ)的葡萄牙语版本:心理测量特性的验证》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 14;19(24):16778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416778.
5
Art in the time of corona: A thematic analysis.新冠疫情时期的艺术:一项主题分析
Arts Psychother. 2021 Sep;75:101824. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2021.101824. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
6
Adolescent technology-use and creative activities during COVID-19: A qualitative study.新冠疫情期间青少年的技术使用与创造性活动:一项定性研究。
Think Skills Creat. 2022 Dec;46:101190. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101190. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
7
Loss, adaptation and growth: The experiences of creative arts therapists during the Covid-19 pandemic.失去、适应与成长:新冠疫情期间创意艺术治疗师的经历
Arts Psychother. 2023 Feb;82:101983. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2022.101983. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
8
Quality of life and prosocial or antisocial coping with resource deprivation: A cross-sectional study of people at risk of social exclusion.生活质量与资源匮乏时的亲社会或反社会应对方式:社会排斥风险人群的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0275234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275234. eCollection 2022.
9
Does creative thinking contribute to the academic integrity of education students?创造性思维对教育专业学生的学术诚信有帮助吗?
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:925195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925195. eCollection 2022.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Spontaneity Assessment Inventory-Revised (SAI-R): The 3-Factor Hypothesis.自发性评估量表修订版(SAI-R)的心理测量特性:三因素假说。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 28;19(13):7924. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137924.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):510-512. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2008017. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
4
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence.隔离的心理影响及其减轻方法:快速综述证据。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
5
Integrative systematic review of psychodrama psychotherapy research: Trends and methodological implications.心理剧心理治疗研究的综合系统评价:趋势与方法学启示。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 19;14(2):e0212575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212575. eCollection 2019.
6
From the Sylvia Plath Effect to Social Justice: Moving Forward With Creativity.从西尔维娅·普拉斯效应到社会正义:以创造力向前迈进。
Eur J Psychol. 2017 May 31;13(2):173-177. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v13i2.1413. eCollection 2017 May.
7
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
8
The Mad-Genius Paradox: Can Creative People Be More Mentally Healthy But Highly Creative People More Mentally Ill?疯狂天才悖论:创造力强的人心理健康程度更高,但高创造力的人更易患心理疾病?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;9(5):470-80. doi: 10.1177/1745691614543973.
9
The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature.世界卫生组织-5 幸福指数:文献系统综述。
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76. doi: 10.1159/000376585. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
10
Parsing protection and risk for problem behavior versus pro-social behavior among US and Chinese adolescents.解析美国和中国青少年问题行为与亲社会行为的保护和风险。
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Jul;43(7):1037-51. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0130-y. Epub 2014 May 6.