School of Creative Arts Therapies, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 19;14(2):e0212575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212575. eCollection 2019.
Psychodrama is an experiential psychotherapy in which guided role-play is used to gain insights and work on personal and interpersonal problems and possible solutions. Despite the wealth of literature describing clinical work, psychodrama intervention research is relatively scarce compared to other psychotherapies and psychological interventions.
For this reason we implemented the integrative approach to systematic review that authorizes the combination of publications with diverse methodologies and all types of participants, interventions, comparisons, and outcomes. Our aim was to produce a comprehensive summary of psychodrama intervention research in the last decade that critically evaluates methodological issues to inform future studies.
We searched four major electronic databases (PsycINFO, PubMEd, Scopus by Elsevier, and Web of Science) for peer-reviewed articles on psychodrama interventions published in English between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017. The quality of qualitative and mixed methods studies was assessed on the basis of pre-established guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed for all quantitative randomized control studies, consistent with the PRISMA protocol.
The database search and a hand search resulted in 31 psychodrama intervention publications. Overall, these studies examined the effects of psychodrama on more than 20 different outcomes and most studies had adult clients. The next largest group was adolescents, whereas only two studies involved children. Thus psychodrama intervention research in the last decade suggests there are promising results in all methodologies, and highlights the need to enhance methodological as well as reporting quality and to theorize and examine modality-specific mechanisms that lead to therapeutic change. Recommendations to improve methodology, transparency, and specificity in reporting future psychodrama and other psychotherapy research are discussed.
心理剧是一种体验式心理疗法,通过引导角色扮演来深入了解个人和人际问题,并寻找可能的解决方案。尽管有大量文献描述了临床工作,但与其他心理疗法和心理干预相比,心理剧干预研究相对较少。
出于这个原因,我们采用了综合系统评价方法,该方法允许将具有不同方法学和各种类型参与者、干预措施、比较和结果的出版物结合起来。我们的目的是对过去十年中心理剧干预研究进行全面总结,批判性地评估方法学问题,为未来的研究提供信息。
我们在四个主要的电子数据库(PsycINFO、PubMEd、爱思唯尔的 Scopus 和 Web of Science)中搜索了 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间以英文发表的关于心理剧干预的同行评议文章。根据既定指南评估定性和混合方法研究的质量,并根据 PRISMA 协议评估所有定量随机对照研究的偏倚风险。
数据库搜索和手工搜索共产生了 31 篇心理剧干预研究出版物。总体而言,这些研究检验了心理剧对 20 多种不同结果的影响,并且大多数研究都有成年客户。其次是青少年,而只有两项研究涉及儿童。因此,过去十年的心理剧干预研究表明,所有方法都有有希望的结果,强调需要提高方法学以及报告质量,并对导致治疗变化的特定模式机制进行理论化和检验。讨论了提高未来心理剧和其他心理治疗研究方法学、透明度和报告特异性的建议。