• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估 DCL-101(一种新型片剂肠道清洁剂)与 4L 聚乙二醇电解质溶液的 2 期随机临床试验。

A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of DCL-101, a Novel Pill-Based Colonoscopy Prep, vs 4L Polyethylene Glycol-Electrolyte Solution.

机构信息

Dark Canyon Laboratories, LLC, Rapid City, South Dakota, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Dec;11(12):e00264. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000264.

DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000264
PMID:33512795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7678801/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

DCL-101, a novel Pill Prep, is compositionally identical to standard 4L polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS) and delivers the salt encapsulated, with PEG 3350 coadministered as a taste-free oral solution. The aim of this study was to compare the safety, taste, and tolerability of DCL-101 with 4L PEG-ELS in outpatients preparing for colonoscopy, with a secondary objective to assess efficacy.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, phase 2 clinical trial of 45 adult patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy. Patients were randomized 2:1 to either DCL-101 (3L in cohort 1; 4L in cohort 2) or 4L PEG-ELS, each administered with split dosing. Safety was assessed over 3 post-treatment clinic visits. Tolerability was measured using the Lawrance Bowel-Preparation Tolerability Questionnaire and the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire. Efficacy was determined by expert central readers, blinded to treatment, using the Ottawa Bowel Preparation Quality Scale, Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, and Aronchick scale.

RESULTS

Both DCL-101 doses had superior taste and tolerability relative to 4L PEG-ELS. All adverse events were grade 1 with no significant differences in adverse events among the 3 regimens. There were no significant differences in efficacy among the 3 treatments as defined by the centrally read Ottawa Bowel Preparation Quality Scale, Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, or Aronchick scores. There were no inadequate preps as judged by the site endoscopist.

DISCUSSION

DCL-101 Pill Prep is a novel strategy that vastly improves the taste and tolerability of PEG-ELS solutions with safety and efficacy comparable with split-dose 4L PEG-ELS solutions.

摘要

简介

DCL-101 是一种新型的药丸准备,其组成与标准的 4L 聚乙二醇电解质溶液(PEG-ELS)完全相同,并将盐包裹在内,同时给予 PEG 3350 作为无味的口服溶液。本研究的目的是比较 DCL-101 与 4L PEG-ELS 在准备接受结肠镜检查的门诊患者中的安全性、口感和耐受性,次要目的是评估疗效。

方法

这是一项多中心、随机、研究者盲法、2 期临床试验,纳入 45 名接受门诊结肠镜检查的成年患者。患者按 2:1 随机分为 DCL-101(队列 1 为 3L;队列 2 为 4L)或 4L PEG-ELS 组,均采用分剂量给药。安全性在 3 次治疗后门诊就诊时评估。耐受性采用劳伦斯肠道准备耐受性问卷和梅奥诊所肠道准备耐受性问卷进行测量。疗效由专家中心读者根据渥太华肠道准备质量量表、波士顿肠道准备量表和 Aronchick 量表进行评估,评估时对治疗方案设盲。

结果

两种 DCL-101 剂量的口感和耐受性均优于 4L PEG-ELS。所有不良事件均为 1 级,3 种方案之间的不良事件无显著差异。3 种治疗方法的疗效无显著差异,定义为中心阅读的渥太华肠道准备质量量表、波士顿肠道准备量表或 Aronchick 评分。根据现场内镜医生的判断,没有不充分的准备。

讨论

DCL-101 药丸准备是一种新颖的策略,可极大改善 PEG-ELS 溶液的口感和耐受性,同时具有与 4L PEG-ELS 分剂量溶液相当的安全性和疗效。

相似文献

1
A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of DCL-101, a Novel Pill-Based Colonoscopy Prep, vs 4L Polyethylene Glycol-Electrolyte Solution.一项评估 DCL-101(一种新型片剂肠道清洁剂)与 4L 聚乙二醇电解质溶液的 2 期随机临床试验。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Dec;11(12):e00264. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000264.
2
Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation.相较于使用常规剂量的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液进行结肠镜检查准备,先给予橄榄油再给予少量聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液可提高患者对右侧结肠清洁的满意度。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
3
Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy.分剂量与当日减量的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液用于上午结肠镜检查的比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 21;20(39):14488-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14488.
4
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
5
Efficacy of Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Powder Combined With Linaclotide for Colon Cleansing in Patients With Chronic Constipation Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Multicenter, Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.聚乙二醇电解质散联合利那洛肽用于结肠镜检查前慢性便秘患者肠道准备的疗效:一项多中心、单盲、随机对照临床试验。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun 1;15(6):e1. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000708.
6
Validation of same-day bowel preparation regimen using 4L polyethylene glycol: Comparison of morning and afternoon colonoscopy.使用4L聚乙二醇的当日肠道准备方案的验证:上午与下午结肠镜检查的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(37):e12431. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012431.
7
Can a 1-day clear liquid diet with a split -dose polyethylene glycol overcome conventional practice patterns during the preparation for screening colonoscopy?在结肠镜筛查准备过程中,一日分剂量聚乙二醇清液饮食能否打破传统的做法模式?
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;30(9):817-825. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2019.19071.
8
A single or split dose picosulphate/magnesium citrate before colonoscopy: comparison regarding tolerance and efficacy with polyethylene glycol. A randomized trial.结肠镜检查前单次或分次服用比沙可啶/枸橼酸镁:与聚乙二醇在耐受性和疗效方面的比较。一项随机试验。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014 Jun;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.232.vk1.
9
A randomized, endoscopist-blinded, prospective trial to compare the preference and efficacy of four bowel-cleansing regimens for colonoscopy.一项随机、内镜医师盲法、前瞻性试验,比较四种结肠镜检查肠道清洁方案的偏好性和有效性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;49(7):871-7. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.910543. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
10
Ascorbic acid PEG-2L is superior for early morning colonoscopies in colorectal cancer screening programs: a prospective non-randomized controlled trial.在结直肠癌筛查项目中,抗坏血酸聚乙二醇-2L在清晨结肠镜检查方面表现更优:一项前瞻性非随机对照试验。
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;38(2):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial.新型硫酸盐片剂 PBK-1701TC 与口服硫酸盐溶液用于结肠清洁:一项随机 3 期试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;35(1):29-36. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14826. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
2
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019.结肠镜检查的肠道准备:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南 - 更新 2019 年。
Endoscopy. 2019 Aug;51(8):775-794. doi: 10.1055/a-0959-0505. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
3
Hyperosmotic low-volume bowel preparations: Is NER1006 safe?
高渗性低容量肠道准备剂:NER1006是否安全?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):656-658. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
4
Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate.新型 1 L 聚乙二醇基肠道准备 NER1006 用于全面和右侧结肠清洗:与三硫酸盐相比的随机对照 3 期试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):677-687.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.047. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
5
Comparison between different colon cleansing products for screening colonoscopy. A noninferiority trial in population-based screening programs in Italy.不同结肠清洁剂在筛查结肠镜检查中的比较。意大利基于人群的筛查计划中的非劣效性试验。
Endoscopy. 2016 Mar;48(3):223-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569574. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
6
Bowel preparation before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前的肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Apr;81(4):781-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.048. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
Intraprocedural cleansing work during colonoscopy and achievable rates of adequate preparation in an open-access endoscopy unit.结肠镜检查过程中的清洁工作和开放准入内镜单位中达到充分准备的可实现率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):525-30. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
8
Development and validation of the Mayo Clinic Bowel Prep Tolerability Questionnaire.梅奥诊所肠道准备耐受性问卷的开发与验证
Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Sep;46(9):808-12. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.05.020. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
9
Patient tolerability of bowel preparation is associated with polyp detection rate during colonoscopy.肠道准备的患者耐受性与结肠镜检查期间的息肉检出率相关。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014 Jun;23(2):135-40. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.232.ewh1.
10
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: entering an era of increased expectations for efficacy.结肠镜检查的肠道准备:步入对疗效期望更高的时代。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;12(3):458-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 13.