• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型硫酸盐片剂 PBK-1701TC 与口服硫酸盐溶液用于结肠清洁:一项随机 3 期试验。

Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine and Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Center for Crohn's and Colitis, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;35(1):29-36. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14826. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.14826
PMID:31396995
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

PBK-1701TC is a novel sulfate tablet-based that contains 320 mg of simethicone and delivers 90% of the salt and water delivered by oral sulfate solution (OSS) preparation. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of PBK-1701TC compared with OSS in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

METHODS

This randomized, multicenter, phase 3 non-inferiority trial included adults aged 19 years or older with a body mass index of 19-30 kg/m undergoing colonoscopy at five university hospitals in Korea. The primary efficacy endpoint was successful bowel-cleansing rate, defined as Harefield Cleansing Scale grade A or B as evaluated by blinded central readers. Secondary endpoints included the presence of residual air bubbles. Adverse events and laboratory evaluations were monitored to assess safety. Tolerability was assessed via participant interview.

RESULTS

Overall, 235 participants were randomized, and 224 were included in the per-protocol analysis (PBK, 112; OSS, 112). Successful bowel cleansing was achieved for 95.5% (107/112) in the PBK group, which was non-inferior to the OSS group (98.2%, 110/112) with a difference of -2.7% (one sided 97.5% confidence limit, -8.1%). The participants in the PBK group had fewer intraluminal bubbles (0.9% vs 81.3%, P < 0.001) and reported a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, with better acceptance, taste, and willingness to repeat the regimen than those in the OSS group (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The novel sulfate tablet, PBK-1701TC, was non-inferior to OSS with respect to bowel-cleansing efficacy and exhibited better safety and tolerability in adults undergoing colonoscopy.

摘要

背景和目的

PBK-1701TC 是一种新型的硫酸盐片剂,含有 320mg 二甲硅油,可提供口服硫酸盐溶液 (OSS) 制剂输送的 90%的盐和水。本研究评估了 PBK-1701TC 与 OSS 相比在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。

方法

这是一项随机、多中心、III 期非劣效性试验,纳入了韩国五所大学医院的年龄在 19 岁及以上、体重指数为 19-30kg/m2 的成年人,这些患者需要接受结肠镜检查。主要疗效终点是由盲法中心读者评估的 Harefield 清洁评分 A 或 B 的成功肠道清洁率。次要终点包括残留气泡的存在。监测不良事件和实验室评估以评估安全性。通过参与者访谈评估耐受性。

结果

共有 235 名参与者被随机分组,224 名参与者纳入意向治疗分析(PBK 组 112 例,OSS 组 112 例)。PBK 组 95.5%(107/112)的患者达到了成功的肠道清洁,非劣效于 OSS 组(98.2%,110/112),差异为-2.7%(单侧 97.5%置信限,-8.1%)。PBK 组的腔内气泡更少(0.9%比 81.3%,P<0.001),报告恶心和呕吐的发生率较低,且接受度、口感和再次使用意愿均优于 OSS 组(均 P<0.05)。

结论

新型硫酸盐片剂 PBK-1701TC 在肠道清洁效果方面不劣于 OSS,在接受结肠镜检查的成年人中表现出更好的安全性和耐受性。

相似文献

1
Novel sulfate tablet PBK-1701TC versus oral sulfate solution for colon cleansing: A randomized phase 3 trial.新型硫酸盐片剂 PBK-1701TC 与口服硫酸盐溶液用于结肠清洁:一项随机 3 期试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;35(1):29-36. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14826. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study.老年患者低容量准备的安全性和有效性:口服硫酸盐溶液在检查日的前一天和分剂量方案(SEE SAFE)研究。
Gut Liver. 2019 Mar 15;13(2):176-182. doi: 10.5009/gnl18214.
3
A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy.一项评估一种新型、小剂量口服硫酸盐结肠镜检查肠道清洁制剂的安全性和有效性的随机临床研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Sep;104(9):2275-84. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.389. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
4
Randomized trial comparing oral sulfate solution with 4-L polyethylene glycol administered in a split dose as preparation for colonoscopy.比较口服硫酸溶液与分剂量服用4升聚乙二醇用于结肠镜检查准备的随机试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;32(1):12-18. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13477.
5
Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate.新型 1 L 聚乙二醇基肠道准备 NER1006 用于全面和右侧结肠清洗:与三硫酸盐相比的随机对照 3 期试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):677-687.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.047. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
6
A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy.一项比较小容量口服硫酸盐溶液与标准 4 升无硫酸盐电解质灌洗溶液用于结肠镜检查准备的随机临床研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Aug;72(2):328-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.03.1054. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
7
Randomized trial of oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol-ascorbic acid for bowel cleansing in elderly people.口服硫酸盐溶液与聚乙二醇 - 抗坏血酸用于老年人肠道清洁的随机试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;37(2):319-326. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15696. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
8
A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study.结肠镜检查前一天给予的双效、低容量肠道清洁剂:SEE CLEAR II 研究结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):401-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.441. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
9
Phase III Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of OSS Versus PEG + Electrolyte Colonoscopy Preparation in Adolescents.OSS 与 PEG+电解质结肠镜检查准备在青少年中的 III 期随机非劣效性研究。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2023 May 1;76(5):652-659. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003745. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
10
A Safety and Efficacy Comparison of a New Sulfate-Based Tablet Bowel Preparation Versus a PEG and Ascorbate Comparator in Adult Subjects Undergoing Colonoscopy.一种新型硫酸盐片剂肠道准备与 PEG 和抗坏血酸盐对照剂在接受结肠镜检查的成年受试者中的安全性和疗效比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 1;116(2):319-328. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001020.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Oral Sulfate Tablet and 2 L-Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective Randomized KASID Multicenter Trial.口服硫酸片剂和含抗坏血酸的2L聚乙二醇用于肠道准备的疗效:一项前瞻性随机KASID多中心试验。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Dec 16;39(48):e301. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e301.
2
Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study.口服硫酸盐片与 2 L 聚乙二醇/抗坏血酸在老年患者肠道准备中的疗效、耐受性和安全性:前瞻性、多中心、研究者单盲、随机研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):402-410. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
3
Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate tablet vs. polyethylene glycol and ascorbate for bowel preparation in children.口服硫酸片剂与聚乙二醇和抗坏血酸盐用于儿童肠道准备的疗效和安全性比较
Front Pediatr. 2024 Feb 8;12:1277083. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1277083. eCollection 2024.
4
Strategies to improve screening colonoscopy quality for the prevention of colorectal cancer.提高结直肠癌预防筛查结肠镜检查质量的策略。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):547-554. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.334. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Comparison of a novel mini-oral sulfate tablet and the conventional oral sulfate tablet in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter, non-inferior, phase 3 trial.新型口服硫酸片与传统口服硫酸片用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、研究者设盲、多中心、非劣效性3期试验。
J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov;58(11):1114-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-02023-5. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
6
The risk of surgical site infection of oral sulfate tablet sodium picosulfate for bowel preparation in colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial.口服硫酸氢钠片用于结直肠癌手术肠道准备的手术部位感染风险:一项随机临床试验。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022 Aug;103(2):96-103. doi: 10.4174/astr.2022.103.2.96. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
7
Taking Oral Sulfate Tablets with Simethicone for Bowel Preparation Leads to Higher Adenoma Detection Rate than Polyethylene Glycol: A Propensity Score Analysis.服用含西甲硅油的口服硫酸盐片进行肠道准备比服用聚乙二醇导致更高的腺瘤检出率:一项倾向评分分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Mar;68(3):867-876. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07611-8. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
8
Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.超低容量(≤1 升)肠道准备液的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Jan;34(1):13-32. doi: 10.1111/den.14015. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
9
A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of DCL-101, a Novel Pill-Based Colonoscopy Prep, vs 4L Polyethylene Glycol-Electrolyte Solution.一项评估 DCL-101(一种新型片剂肠道清洁剂)与 4L 聚乙二醇电解质溶液的 2 期随机临床试验。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Dec;11(12):e00264. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000264.