• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院患者的早期严重疾病沟通:Speaking About Goals and Expectations(SAGE)计划实施的研究。

Early serious illness communication in hospitalized patients: A study of the implementation of the Speaking About Goals and Expectations (SAGE) program.

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Care Continuum Management, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Healthc (Amst). 2021 Jun;9(2):100510. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100510. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100510
PMID:33517037
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early conversations about patients' goals and values in advancing serious illness (serious illness conversations) can drive better healthcare. However, these conversations frequently happen during acute illness, often near death, without time to realize benefits of early communication.

METHODS

The Speaking About Goals and Expectations (SAGE) Program, adapted from the Serious Illness Care Program, is a multicomponent intervention designed to foster earlier and more comprehensive serious illness conversations for patients admitted to the hospital. We present a quality improvement study of the SAGE Program assessing older adults admitted to a general medicine service at the Brigham & Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. Our primary outcomes included the proportion of patients with at least one documented conversation, the timing between first conversation documented and death, the quality of conversations, and their interprofessional nature. Secondary outcomes assessed evaluations of the training and hospital utilization.

RESULTS

We trained 37 clinicians and studied 133 patients split between the SAGE intervention and a comparison population. Intervention patients were more likely to have documented serious illness conversations (89.1% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001); these conversations occurred earlier (mean of 598.9 vs. 180.8 days before death, p < 0.001) and included more key elements of conversation (mean of 6.56 vs. 1.78, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated significant differences in the frequency and quality of serious illness conversations completed earlier in the illness course for hospitalized patients.

IMPLICATIONS

Programs designed to drive serious illness conversations earlier in the hospital may be an effective way to improve care for patients not reached in the ambulatory setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospectively designed trial, non-randomized sample.

摘要

背景

早期讨论患者在推进重病(重病对话)中的目标和价值观可以改善医疗保健。然而,这些对话经常在急性疾病期间发生,通常在接近死亡时发生,没有时间实现早期沟通的好处。

方法

从重病护理计划改编的“说话关于目标和期望”(SAGE)计划是一种多组分干预措施,旨在促进住院患者更早和更全面的重病对话。我们介绍了 SAGE 计划的质量改进研究,该计划评估了马萨诸塞州波士顿布莱根妇女医院普通内科病房收治的老年患者。我们的主要结果包括至少有一次记录对话的患者比例、首次记录对话与死亡之间的时间间隔、对话的质量及其跨专业性质。次要结果评估了培训和医院利用情况的评估。

结果

我们培训了 37 名临床医生,并对 SAGE 干预组和对照组的 133 名患者进行了研究。干预组患者更有可能有记录的重病对话(89.1% vs. 26.1%,p < 0.001);这些对话发生得更早(平均为死亡前 598.9 天 vs. 180.8 天,p < 0.001),并且包括更多的对话关键要素(平均 6.56 个 vs. 1.78 个,p < 0.001)。

结论

这项研究表明,住院患者在疾病早期进行重病对话的频率和质量有显著差异。

含义

旨在更早地在医院进行重病对话的计划可能是改善未在门诊环境中接触到的患者护理的有效方法。

证据水平

前瞻性设计的试验,非随机样本。

相似文献

1
Early serious illness communication in hospitalized patients: A study of the implementation of the Speaking About Goals and Expectations (SAGE) program.住院患者的早期严重疾病沟通:Speaking About Goals and Expectations(SAGE)计划实施的研究。
Healthc (Amst). 2021 Jun;9(2):100510. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100510. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Evaluating an Intervention to Improve Communication Between Oncology Clinicians and Patients With Life-Limiting Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of the Serious Illness Care Program.评估一项改善肿瘤临床医生与生命末期癌症患者沟通的干预措施:严重疾病护理计划的一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):801-809. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0292.
3
A systematic intervention to improve serious illness communication in primary care: Effect on expenses at the end of life.一项旨在改善初级保健中重病沟通的系统干预措施:对生命终末期费用的影响。
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Jun;8(2):100431. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100431. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
A Systematic Intervention To Improve Serious Illness Communication In Primary Care.系统干预以改善初级保健中的重病沟通。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jul 1;36(7):1258-1264. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0219.
5
Implementing Serious Illness Communication Processes in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.在初级保健中实施严重疾病沟通流程:一项定性研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 May;38(5):459-466. doi: 10.1177/1049909120951095. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
6
Quality of clinicians' conversations with patients and families before and after implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program in a hospital setting: a retrospective chart review study.在医院环境中实施严重疾病护理计划前后临床医生与患者及其家属沟通质量的回顾性图表研究。
CMAJ Open. 2020 Jun 19;8(2):E448-E454. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190193. Print 2020 Apr-Jun.
7
Clinicians' Perspectives After Implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program: A Qualitative Study.实施重症护理计划后临床医生的观点:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121517. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21517.
8
A Qualitative Study of Serious Illness Conversations in Patients with Advanced Cancer.一项关于晚期癌症患者严重疾病对话的定性研究。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Jul;22(7):773-781. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0487. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
9
Adapting the serious illness conversation guide for use in the emergency department by social workers.让社会工作者改编用于急诊科的重病谈话指南。
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Dec;19(6):681-685. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521000821.
10
A Descriptive Analysis of End-of-Life Conversations With Long-Term Glioblastoma Survivors.对长期胶质母细胞瘤幸存者临终谈话的描述性分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 May;35(5):804-811. doi: 10.1177/1049909117738996. Epub 2017 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Serious Illness Communication with Hospitalized Limited English Proficient Patients: A Mixed Methods Study.与住院的英语水平有限患者进行重症疾病沟通的质量:一项混合方法研究。
Palliat Med Rep. 2025 May 22;6(1):282-290. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2025.0005. eCollection 2025.
2
Nudging Health Behavior Change Among Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients: A Scoping Review.推动居家心脏康复患者的健康行为改变:一项范围综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Mar 19;18:1639-1653. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S515523. eCollection 2025.
3
Barriers and Strategies to Effective Serious Illness Communication for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease in the Intensive Care Setting.
重症监护环境下终末期肝病患者有效重症疾病沟通的障碍与策略
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Sep 9:8850666241280892. doi: 10.1177/08850666241280892.
4
The Sowers of Seeds: A Qualitative Analysis of the Role of Palliative Care Educators in Facilitating Goals-of-Care Conversations and Palliative Care Referrals.种子播种者:对姑息治疗教育者在促进照护目标对话及姑息治疗转诊中所起作用的定性分析
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 28;42(8):10499091241267917. doi: 10.1177/10499091241267917.
5
Five ways to get a grip on the personal emotional cost of breaking bad news.应对告知坏消息带来的个人情感代价的五种方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Jul 12;15(3):97-99. doi: 10.36834/cmej.78228. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Looking Beyond Mortality Prediction: Primary Care Physician Views of Patients' Palliative Care Needs Predicted by a Machine Learning Tool.超越死亡率预测:初级保健医生对机器学习工具预测的患者姑息治疗需求的看法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 May;15(3):460-468. doi: 10.1055/a-2309-1599. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
7
Core Competencies for Serious Illness Conversations: An Integrative Systematic Review.严重疾病对话的核心能力:综合系统评价。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Oct;39(4):340-351. doi: 10.1177/08258597241245022. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
8
A Mixed Methods Analysis of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations Within an Electronic Health Record Module During Hospitalization.基于电子病历模块的住院期间严重疾病交流的标准化文档记录的混合方法分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Jan;42(1):14-19. doi: 10.1177/10499091241228269. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
9
Exploring the value of structured narrative feedback within the Serious Illness Conversation-Evaluation Exercise (SIC-Ex): a qualitative analysis.探索结构化叙事反馈在严重疾病对话评估练习(SIC-Ex)中的价值:一项定性分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 29;14(1):e078385. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078385.
10
Implementing a Serious Illness Risk Prediction Model: Impact on Goals of Care Documentation.实施重病风险预测模型:对关怀目标文档记录的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Dec;66(6):603-610.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.07.015. Epub 2023 Jul 31.