Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Gait Posture. 2021 Mar;85:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.12.028. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
Multidirectional walking, including backward walking, is integral to daily activities, and seems particularly challenging in older age, and in people with pathology affecting postural control such as dementia.
Does exercise influence backward walking speed in people with dementia, when tested using habitual walking aids and without, and do effects differ according to walking aid use?
This study included 141 women and 45 men (mean age 85 years) with dementia from the Umeå Dementia and Exercise (UMDEX), a cluster-randomized controlled trial study set in 16 nursing homes in Umeå, Sweden. Participants were randomized to a High-Intensity Functional Exercise (HIFE) program targeting lower limb strength-, balance and mobility exercise or to a seated attention control activity. Blinded assessors measured 2.4-meter usual backward walking speed, at baseline, 4 - (intervention completion) and 7-month follow-up; tested 1) with habitual walking aids allowed, and 2) without walking aids.
Linear mixed models showed no between-group effect in either backward walking speed test at 4 or 7 months; test 1) 0.005 m/s, P = .788 and -0.006 m/s, P = .754 and test 2) 0.030 m/s, P = .231 and 0.015 m/s, P = .569, respectively. In interaction analyses, exercise effects differed significantly between participants who habitually walked unaided compared with those that used a walking aid at 7 months (0.094 m/s, P = .027).
In this study of older people with dementia living in nursing homes, the effects of exercise had no overall effects on backwards walking speed. Nevertheless, some benefit was indicated in participants who habitually walked unaided, which is promising and merits further investigation in future studies.
多向行走,包括倒退行走,是日常生活的重要组成部分,在老年人和患有影响姿势控制的疾病(如痴呆症)的人群中似乎特别具有挑战性。
在使用习惯性助行器和不使用助行器的情况下,运动是否会影响痴呆症患者的后退行走速度,并且根据助行器的使用情况,效果是否存在差异?
这项研究包括来自瑞典于默奥的痴呆症和运动(UMDEX)的 141 名女性和 45 名男性参与者(平均年龄 85 岁),这是一项在瑞典于默奥的 16 家养老院进行的集群随机对照试验研究。参与者被随机分配到高强度功能锻炼(HIFE)计划中,该计划针对下肢力量、平衡和移动性锻炼,或参与坐姿注意力控制活动。盲法评估员在基线、4 个月(干预完成时)和 7 个月随访时测量了参与者 2.4 米的习惯性后退行走速度;测试 1)使用习惯性助行器,和 2)不使用助行器。
线性混合模型显示,在 4 个月或 7 个月时,两组在任何一项后退行走速度测试中均无组间效应;测试 1)速度增加 0.005 米/秒,P =.788 和速度减少 0.006 米/秒,P =.754,测试 2)速度增加 0.030 米/秒,P =.231 和速度减少 0.015 米/秒,P =.569,分别。在交互分析中,在 7 个月时,习惯性不使用助行器的参与者与使用助行器的参与者之间的运动效果存在显著差异(速度增加 0.094 米/秒,P =.027)。
在这项针对居住在养老院的老年痴呆症患者的研究中,运动对后退行走速度没有总体影响。然而,对于习惯性不使用助行器的参与者,运动显示出了一定的益处,这是有希望的,并值得在未来的研究中进一步探讨。