Department of Behavioural Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal 4041, South Africa; Department of Psychology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN 37132, USA.
Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Marseille 13007, France.
J Sport Health Sci. 2021 Jan;10(1):73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
Research on achievement goal orientations in sport has typically relied on the use of variable-centered approaches that tend to overlook population heterogeneity. In this study, we used a person-centered approach to identify subgroups of competitive tennis players according to unique combinations of achievement goal orientations and tested for subgroup differences in motivation and mental toughness.
A sample of 323 competitive tennis athletes (69.35% male) between 15 and 25 years of age (17.60 ± 2.40 years, mean ± SD) completed the 3 × 2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire for Sport, Sport Motivation Scale II, and Mental Toughness Index. Latent profile analysis was used to identify unique combinations of achievement goal orientations. Comparisons between latent subgroups on autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and mental toughness were performed using analysis of variance.
Latent profile analysis supported 3 distinct patterns of achievement goal profiles that were primarily distinguishable based on valence of competence (i.e., approach vs. avoidance). Analyses of variance indicated that athletes who were classified into subgroups that endorsed approach types of goals (regardless of the types of avoidance goals they endorsed) reported higher levels of autonomous motivation and mental toughness.
Results indicated that athletes tend to pursue a number of achievement goals collectively rather than in isolation. Although approach goals are more commonly linked to adaptive psychological functioning and positive outcomes, avoidance goals may also be associated with desirable psychological characteristics if they are pursued in conjunction with approach types of achievement goals.
运动领域的成就目标取向研究通常依赖于使用变量中心方法,这种方法往往忽略了群体异质性。在这项研究中,我们使用了一种以人为中心的方法,根据成就目标取向的独特组合来识别竞技网球运动员的亚组,并测试了动机和心理韧性方面的亚组差异。
本研究共纳入了 323 名 15 至 25 岁(17.60±2.40 岁,均值±标准差)的竞技网球运动员(69.35%为男性),他们完成了 3×2 运动成就目标问卷、运动动机量表第二版和心理韧性指数。使用潜在剖面分析来识别成就目标取向的独特组合。采用方差分析比较潜在亚组在自主动机、控制动机和心理韧性方面的差异。
潜在剖面分析支持了 3 种不同的成就目标模式,这些模式主要基于能力的效价(即接近或回避)来区分。方差分析表明,被归类为追求接近型目标(无论他们是否追求回避型目标)的运动员报告了更高水平的自主动机和心理韧性。
研究结果表明,运动员倾向于集体追求多种成就目标,而不是孤立地追求某一种目标。虽然接近型目标通常与适应性的心理功能和积极的结果相关,但如果与接近型的成就目标一起追求,回避型目标也可能与理想的心理特征相关。