Schlintl Carina, Schienle Anne
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 14;11:608595. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.608595. eCollection 2020.
Research has demonstrated that personality characteristics, such as optimism are associated with placebo/nocebo responding. The present study investigated whether written information about the optimism of a placebo/nocebo provider can influence the occurrence of reported placebo/nocebo side effects.
We analyzed data from 201 females (mean age = 26 years) who participated in a "clinical study on a new massage oil with stone clover extract." The oil (sunflower oil) was introduced as either eliciting a negative side effect (unpleasant itching; "nocebo oil") or a positive side effect (pleasant tingling; "placebo oil"). The administration of the oil was combined with written information about the maker of the product. The oil maker was either portrayed as a very optimistic person or no personal information was provided (only the company name). The participants had no personal contact with the experimenter and received all materials and instructions per post.
The participants reported more frequent and intense itching when they received a nocebo suggestion compared to a placebo suggestion. Positive tingling sensations were reported more frequently than itching but did not differ between the placebo/nocebo conditions. Information about the optimism of the oil maker was associated with a lower frequency of reported side effects (adverse and beneficial).
This study demonstrated that it is sufficient to provide participants with written information about an inert substance to elicit the suggested side effect. Information about the provider's optimistic personality did not specifically influence reported side effects. Future studies should focus on how to adapt written information about a drug/product to minimize adverse side effects and to maximize positive side effects.
研究表明,诸如乐观等人格特征与安慰剂/反安慰剂反应相关。本研究调查了关于安慰剂/反安慰剂提供者乐观态度的书面信息是否会影响所报告的安慰剂/反安慰剂副作用的发生。
我们分析了201名女性(平均年龄 = 26岁)的数据,她们参与了一项“关于含有石苜蓿提取物的新型按摩油的临床研究”。该油(向日葵油)被介绍为会引发负面副作用(不愉快的瘙痒;“反安慰剂油”)或正面副作用(愉悦的刺痛感;“安慰剂油”)。油的施用与关于产品制造商的书面信息相结合。油的制造商要么被描绘成一个非常乐观的人,要么不提供个人信息(仅提供公司名称)。参与者与实验者没有个人接触,所有材料和说明均通过邮寄方式接收。
与安慰剂建议相比,参与者在收到反安慰剂建议时报告的瘙痒更频繁、更强烈。报告愉悦刺痛感的频率高于瘙痒,但在安慰剂/反安慰剂条件之间没有差异。关于油制造商乐观态度的信息与所报告副作用(不良和有益)的较低频率相关。
本研究表明,向参与者提供关于惰性物质的书面信息足以引发所建议的副作用。关于提供者乐观人格的信息并没有特别影响所报告的副作用。未来的研究应关注如何调整关于药物/产品的书面信息,以尽量减少不良副作用并最大化正面副作用。