Optometry and Visual Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Jan 15;10(1):26. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.1.26. eCollection 2021 Jan.
To test the effect of different dark adaptation conditions and reliability indices on the variability of two color scotopic microperimetry.
We analyzed data from 22 consecutive visually healthy adults. Scotopic microperimetry was performed (Macular Integrity Assessment microperimeter, CenterVue, Padua, Italy) with two wavelength stimuli, cyan (505 nm) and red (627 nm), after a dark adaptation time of 10, 20, or 30 minutes. All tests were repeated twice to measure test-retest variability with Bland-Altman plots. We also provide a method to more accurately quantify the false-positive (FP) responses based on response data (button pressing) from the device, similar to FP responses used in standard static perimetry. Data on fixation stability (95% bivariate contour ellipse area) and blind spot responses were also extracted. Their relationship with measured sensitivity (in decibels) and test-retest variability was quantified through linear mixed effect models.
Dark adaptation had a significant effect on the sensitivity (dB) measured with the cyan stimulus ( < 0.001), but no effect on the red stimulus. Of the three metrics, the novel FP responses showed the best association with test-retest variability and was the only predictor consistently significant for all tests ( < 0.01).
Dark adaptation protocols should be carefully standardized for scotopic testing, especially if a cyan stimulus is used. The proposed FP responses should be used to assess reliability of microperimetry examinations instead of other metrics.
We developed a method to calculate a more accurate estimate of the FP responses using data available to all researchers, generalizable to all Macular Integrity Assessment microperimeter tests.
测试不同暗适应条件和可靠性指标对两种色视暗点微视野计变异的影响。
我们分析了 22 名连续的视觉健康成年人的数据。使用两种波长刺激(505nm 的青色和 627nm 的红色)进行视暗点微视野计检查(黄斑完整性评估微视野计,CenterVue,帕多瓦,意大利),暗适应时间为 10、20 或 30 分钟。所有测试均重复两次,通过 Bland-Altman 图测量测试-再测试变异性。我们还提供了一种方法,根据设备的反应数据(按钮按压)更准确地量化假阳性(FP)反应,类似于标准静态视野计中的 FP 反应。还提取了注视稳定性(95%双变量轮廓椭圆面积)和盲点反应的数据。通过线性混合效应模型量化了它们与测量灵敏度(分贝)和测试-再测试变异性的关系。
暗适应对青色刺激测量的灵敏度(dB)有显著影响(<0.001),但对红色刺激没有影响。在这三个指标中,新的 FP 反应与测试-再测试变异性的相关性最好,并且是所有测试中唯一一致有统计学意义的预测因子(<0.01)。
暗适应方案应仔细标准化,尤其是在使用青色刺激的情况下。应使用建议的 FP 反应来评估微视野计检查的可靠性,而不是其他指标。
我们开发了一种使用所有研究人员都可获得的数据计算更准确的 FP 反应估计的方法,可推广到所有黄斑完整性评估微视野计检查。