• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Methodology for task-shifting evidence-based psychological treatments to non-licenced/lay health workers: protocol for a systematic review.将基于证据的心理治疗工作下转给无照/非专业卫生工作者的方法学:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 1;11(2):e044012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044012.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions for reducing transmission of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.非药物干预措施对降低 COVID-19 传播的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 22;10(10):e041383. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041383.
6
Changes in blood pressure among users of lay health worker or volunteer operated community-based blood pressure programs over time: a systematic review protocol.随着时间推移,由非专业卫生工作者或志愿者运营的社区血压项目使用者的血压变化:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):30-40. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1927.
7
Minocycline for the treatment of mental health and neurological conditions: study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.米诺环素治疗心理健康和神经疾病的研究方案:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 19;10(3):e035080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035080.
8
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.在医疗保健干预随机试验的系统评价中,因对结果和分析进行选择性纳入及报告而产生的偏倚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.
9
Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol.识别对初级保健执业护士实践敏感的指标:系统评价方案综述
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):e043213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043213.
10
Voices from low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol of primary healthcare interventions within public health systems addressing intimate partner violence against women.来自低收入和中等收入国家的声音:一项关于公共卫生系统中针对亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为的初级卫生保健干预措施的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 25;8(3):e019266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019266.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the Fidelity of Digital Peer Support: A Preliminary Approach using Natural Language Processing to Scale High-Fidelity Digital Peer Support.探究数字同伴支持的保真度:一种使用自然语言处理扩大高保真数字同伴支持的初步方法。
Biomed Eng Syst Technol Int Jt Conf BIOSTEC Revis Sel Pap. 2023 Feb;2023:581-592. doi: 10.5220/0011776500003414.
2
Coaching third parties for suicide prevention.指导第三方预防自杀。
Behav Ther (N Y N Y). 2024 Jul;47(5):247-255.
3
Increasing access to behavioral health care: Examples of task shifting in two U.S. government health care systems.增加行为健康护理的可及性:美国两个政府医疗系统中的任务转移实例。
Fam Syst Health. 2024 Dec;42(4):626-636. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000886. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
Predictors of cessation of exclusive breastfeeding according to the Cox regression model: survey of mothers of children aged 6-12 months, Thiès, Senegal.根据 Cox 回归模型预测停止纯母乳喂养的因素:塞内加尔蒂埃斯 6-12 个月龄儿童的母亲调查。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Sep 11;46:12. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.12.39603. eCollection 2023.
5
Task shifting and task sharing in the health sector in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence, success indicators, challenges, and opportunities.撒哈拉以南非洲卫生部门的工作重迭和分担:证据、成功指标、挑战和机会。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Sep 11;46:11. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.11.40984. eCollection 2023.
6
Lay Health Workers Engaging Latino Fathers: A qualitative study.非专业卫生工作者与拉丁裔父亲的接触:一项定性研究。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022 Oct;141. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106601. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
7
Measurement and assessment of fidelity and competence in nonspecialist-delivered, evidence-based behavioral and mental health interventions: A systematic review.非专科人员提供的循证行为和心理健康干预措施的保真度和能力的测量与评估:一项系统综述
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Oct 4;19:101249. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101249. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
Mind the gap: Identifying training needs of community health workers to address mental health in U.S. Latino communities during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.注意差距:确定社区卫生工作者在新冠疫情期间和之后解决美国拉丁裔社区心理健康问题的培训需求。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 12;10:928575. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.928575. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Community health workers for pandemic response: a rapid evidence synthesis.社区卫生工作者在应对大流行病中的作用:快速证据综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002769.
2
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
3
Community Health Workers and Pandemic Preparedness: Current and Prospective Roles.社区卫生工作者与大流行防范:当前及未来的角色
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 26;7:62. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00062. eCollection 2019.
4
To go or not go: Patient preference in seeking specialty mental health versus behavioral consultation within the primary care behavioral health consultation model.去还是不去:在初级保健行为健康咨询模式下,患者在寻求专科心理健康服务与行为咨询之间的偏好。
Fam Syst Health. 2018 Dec;36(4):513-517. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000374. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
5
What do we know about community-based health worker programs? A systematic review of existing reviews on community health workers.我们对基于社区的卫生工作者项目了解多少?对社区卫生工作者现有综述的系统评价。
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Aug 16;16(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12960-018-0304-x.
6
Lay Health Worker Involvement in Evidence-Based Treatment Delivery: A Conceptual Model to Address Disparities in Care.非专业医疗人员参与循证治疗实施:解决护理差异的概念模型。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018 May 7;14:185-208. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084825. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Cochrane's risk of bias tool in the context of psychotherapy outcome research.Cochrane 偏倚风险工具在心理治疗结果研究中的应用。
Psychother Res. 2018 May;28(3):347-355. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2017.1411628. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
8
Mobilizing Community Health Workers to Address Mental Health Disparities for Underserved Populations: A Systematic Review.动员社区卫生工作者解决弱势群体的心理健康差距:一项系统综述
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Mar;45(2):195-211. doi: 10.1007/s10488-017-0815-0.
9
Psychological Treatments for the World: Lessons from Low- and Middle-Income Countries.面向全球的心理治疗:来自低收入和中等收入国家的经验教训。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:149-181. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045217.
10
Task-Sharing Approaches to Improve Mental Health Care in Rural and Other Low-Resource Settings: A Systematic Review.任务分担方法在改善农村和其他资源匮乏地区精神卫生保健中的应用:系统评价。
J Rural Health. 2018 Dec;34(1):48-62. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12229. Epub 2017 Jan 13.

将基于证据的心理治疗工作下转给无照/非专业卫生工作者的方法学:系统评价方案。

Methodology for task-shifting evidence-based psychological treatments to non-licenced/lay health workers: protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Center for Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA

Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 1;11(2):e044012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044012.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044012
PMID:33526503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7852942/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

'Task-shifting' or 'task-sharing' is an effective strategy for delivering behavioural healthcare in lower resource communities. However, little is known regarding the actual steps (methods) in carrying out a task-shifting project. This paper presents a protocol for a systematic review that will identify steps in adapting an evidence-based psychological treatment for delivery by lay/non-licenced personnel.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic review of peer-reviewed, published studies involving a non-licenced, non-specialist (eg, community health worker, promotor/a, peer and lay person) delivering an evidence-based psychological treatment for adults will be conducted. Study design of selected articles must include a statistical comparison (eg, randomised controlled trials, quasiexperimental trials, pre-post designs and pragmatic trials). Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, APA PsycInfo and Google Scholar will be searched from 2000 to 2020. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool, and publication bias will be evaluated with the Cochrane GRADE approach. A narrative synthesis will be conducted for all included studies, and a summary table following Proctor's framework for operationalising implementation strategies will be included. This protocol was developed following the 2015 guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This review will analyse data from published studies only; thus, it will not require institutional board review. Findings will be presented at conferences, to the broader community via the Community Health Worker Translational Advisory Board and social media, and the final systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

摘要

简介

“任务转移”或“任务分担”是在资源较少的社区提供行为保健的有效策略。然而,对于实施任务转移项目的实际步骤(方法)知之甚少。本文介绍了一项系统评价的方案,该方案将确定改编基于证据的心理治疗方法以由非持照人员提供的步骤。

方法和分析

将对涉及非持照人员(例如社区卫生工作者、促进者/宣传员、同伴和非专业人员)提供成人基于证据的心理治疗的同行评审、已发表的研究进行系统评价。所选文章的研究设计必须包括统计比较(例如,随机对照试验、准实验试验、前后设计和实用试验)。研究选择将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的指南。将从 2000 年到 2020 年在包括 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册、SCOPUS、护理和联合健康文献累积索引、美国心理学会心理信息和 Google Scholar 在内的数据库中进行搜索。使用 Cochrane 协作的风险偏倚(RoB 2)工具评估偏倚风险,并使用 Cochrane GRADE 方法评估发表偏倚。将对所有纳入的研究进行叙述性综合,并根据 Proctor 的实施策略操作框架纳入总结表。本方案是根据 2015 年系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目指南制定的。

伦理和传播

本综述仅分析已发表研究的数据;因此,它不需要机构委员会审查。研究结果将在会议上展示,通过社区卫生工作者转化咨询委员会和社交媒体向更广泛的社区展示,并将最终的系统评价发表在同行评议的期刊上。