Suppr超能文献

将基于证据的心理治疗工作下转给无照/非专业卫生工作者的方法学:系统评价方案。

Methodology for task-shifting evidence-based psychological treatments to non-licenced/lay health workers: protocol for a systematic review.

机构信息

Center for Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA

Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 1;11(2):e044012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044012.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

'Task-shifting' or 'task-sharing' is an effective strategy for delivering behavioural healthcare in lower resource communities. However, little is known regarding the actual steps (methods) in carrying out a task-shifting project. This paper presents a protocol for a systematic review that will identify steps in adapting an evidence-based psychological treatment for delivery by lay/non-licenced personnel.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic review of peer-reviewed, published studies involving a non-licenced, non-specialist (eg, community health worker, promotor/a, peer and lay person) delivering an evidence-based psychological treatment for adults will be conducted. Study design of selected articles must include a statistical comparison (eg, randomised controlled trials, quasiexperimental trials, pre-post designs and pragmatic trials). Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, APA PsycInfo and Google Scholar will be searched from 2000 to 2020. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool, and publication bias will be evaluated with the Cochrane GRADE approach. A narrative synthesis will be conducted for all included studies, and a summary table following Proctor's framework for operationalising implementation strategies will be included. This protocol was developed following the 2015 guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This review will analyse data from published studies only; thus, it will not require institutional board review. Findings will be presented at conferences, to the broader community via the Community Health Worker Translational Advisory Board and social media, and the final systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

摘要

简介

“任务转移”或“任务分担”是在资源较少的社区提供行为保健的有效策略。然而,对于实施任务转移项目的实际步骤(方法)知之甚少。本文介绍了一项系统评价的方案,该方案将确定改编基于证据的心理治疗方法以由非持照人员提供的步骤。

方法和分析

将对涉及非持照人员(例如社区卫生工作者、促进者/宣传员、同伴和非专业人员)提供成人基于证据的心理治疗的同行评审、已发表的研究进行系统评价。所选文章的研究设计必须包括统计比较(例如,随机对照试验、准实验试验、前后设计和实用试验)。研究选择将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的指南。将从 2000 年到 2020 年在包括 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册、SCOPUS、护理和联合健康文献累积索引、美国心理学会心理信息和 Google Scholar 在内的数据库中进行搜索。使用 Cochrane 协作的风险偏倚(RoB 2)工具评估偏倚风险,并使用 Cochrane GRADE 方法评估发表偏倚。将对所有纳入的研究进行叙述性综合,并根据 Proctor 的实施策略操作框架纳入总结表。本方案是根据 2015 年系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目指南制定的。

伦理和传播

本综述仅分析已发表研究的数据;因此,它不需要机构委员会审查。研究结果将在会议上展示,通过社区卫生工作者转化咨询委员会和社交媒体向更广泛的社区展示,并将最终的系统评价发表在同行评议的期刊上。

相似文献

4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验