Suppr超能文献

中药口服治疗变应性鼻炎的系统评价和荟萃分析:随机对照试验。

Oral application of Chinese herbal medicine for allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Phytother Res. 2021 Jun;35(6):3113-3129. doi: 10.1002/ptr.7037. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

Abstract

Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has long been used for allergic rhinitis (AR). This systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical effects and safety of oral CHM for AR by comparing it to Western medications (WM). Nineteen databases were searched up to May 27, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of CHM on the primary or secondary outcomes comparing to WM, in any age of the patients, were included. The pooled results were expressed as mean difference, standardized mean difference, or odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Eighteen RCTs were included and 17 of them were evaluated in the meta-analysis. CHM may improve total nasal symptom scores, individual symptom scores (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, sneezing, and nasal itching), quality of life, and recurrence rate, compared to antihistamines (loratadine and chlorpheniramine). Only mild and transient adverse events of CHM were reported. However, there were no significant differences in some subgroup analyses in total nasal symptom scores, rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, sneezing, nasal itching, and SF-36. Due to the small number of included studies, poor quality of trial design, and substantial heterogeneities, the potential of CHM for AR should be validated in large, multicenter, and well-designed RCTs in the future.

摘要

中草药(CHM)长期以来一直用于治疗过敏性鼻炎(AR)。本系统评价旨在通过与西药(WM)比较,调查口服 CHM 治疗 AR 的临床效果和安全性。截至 2020 年 5 月 27 日,检索了 19 个数据库。纳入了评估 CHM 对主要或次要结局影响的随机对照试验(RCT),与 WM 相比,患者年龄不限。汇总结果以均数差、标准化均数差或比值比(95%置信区间)表示。纳入了 18 项 RCT,其中 17 项进行了荟萃分析。与抗组胺药(氯雷他定和氯苯那敏)相比,CHM 可能改善总鼻部症状评分、个别症状评分(流涕、鼻塞、打喷嚏和鼻痒)、生活质量和复发率。仅报告了 CHM 的轻度和短暂不良反应。然而,在总鼻部症状评分、流涕、鼻塞、打喷嚏、鼻痒和 SF-36 方面的一些亚组分析中,没有显著差异。由于纳入研究数量较少、试验设计质量差和存在很大的异质性,未来需要在大型、多中心和精心设计的 RCT 中验证 CHM 治疗 AR 的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f0d/8457023/f6d2c15570ce/nihms-1673074-f0001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
New progress in pediatric allergic rhinitis.儿童过敏性鼻炎的新进展。
Front Immunol. 2024 Sep 16;15:1452410. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1452410. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

8
Clinical practice guideline: Allergic rhinitis.临床实践指南:变应性鼻炎。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(1 Suppl):S1-43. doi: 10.1177/0194599814561600.
10
Pathophysiology of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis.变应性和非变应性鼻炎的病理生理学。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011 Mar;8(1):106-14. doi: 10.1513/pats.201008-057RN.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验