School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Phytother Res. 2021 Jun;35(6):3113-3129. doi: 10.1002/ptr.7037. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has long been used for allergic rhinitis (AR). This systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical effects and safety of oral CHM for AR by comparing it to Western medications (WM). Nineteen databases were searched up to May 27, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of CHM on the primary or secondary outcomes comparing to WM, in any age of the patients, were included. The pooled results were expressed as mean difference, standardized mean difference, or odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Eighteen RCTs were included and 17 of them were evaluated in the meta-analysis. CHM may improve total nasal symptom scores, individual symptom scores (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, sneezing, and nasal itching), quality of life, and recurrence rate, compared to antihistamines (loratadine and chlorpheniramine). Only mild and transient adverse events of CHM were reported. However, there were no significant differences in some subgroup analyses in total nasal symptom scores, rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, sneezing, nasal itching, and SF-36. Due to the small number of included studies, poor quality of trial design, and substantial heterogeneities, the potential of CHM for AR should be validated in large, multicenter, and well-designed RCTs in the future.
中草药(CHM)长期以来一直用于治疗过敏性鼻炎(AR)。本系统评价旨在通过与西药(WM)比较,调查口服 CHM 治疗 AR 的临床效果和安全性。截至 2020 年 5 月 27 日,检索了 19 个数据库。纳入了评估 CHM 对主要或次要结局影响的随机对照试验(RCT),与 WM 相比,患者年龄不限。汇总结果以均数差、标准化均数差或比值比(95%置信区间)表示。纳入了 18 项 RCT,其中 17 项进行了荟萃分析。与抗组胺药(氯雷他定和氯苯那敏)相比,CHM 可能改善总鼻部症状评分、个别症状评分(流涕、鼻塞、打喷嚏和鼻痒)、生活质量和复发率。仅报告了 CHM 的轻度和短暂不良反应。然而,在总鼻部症状评分、流涕、鼻塞、打喷嚏、鼻痒和 SF-36 方面的一些亚组分析中,没有显著差异。由于纳入研究数量较少、试验设计质量差和存在很大的异质性,未来需要在大型、多中心和精心设计的 RCT 中验证 CHM 治疗 AR 的潜力。