Devold Pay Aase S, Johansen Katarina, Staff Anne C, Laine Katariina H, Blix Ellen, Økland Inger
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Women Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Eur J Midwifery. 2020 Nov 20;4:44. doi: 10.18332/ejm/128364. eCollection 2020.
External cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentation involves manual manipulation of the fetus from breech to cephalic presentation at or near term, in an attempt to avoid breech birth. This systematic review summarizes the literature on the effects of ECV at or near term on pregnancy outcomes in high-resource settings.
The MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MIDIRS, and SweMED+ databases were searched for relevant articles published through April 2019, with no limitation on publication date. Clinical trials comparing the effects of ECV at ≥36 weeks, with or without tocolysis, with that of no ECV, conducted in northern, western, and central Europe, the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were eligible for inclusion.
Nine articles reporting on 184704 breech pregnancies were included. Pooled data showed that ECV attempts reduced the failure to achieve vaginal cephalic birth (risk ratio, RR=0.56; 95% CI: 0.45-0.71), caesarean section performance (RR=0.57; 95% CI: 0.50-0.64), and non-cephalic presentation at birth (RR=0.45; 95% CI: 0.29-0.68) compared with no ECV. ECV attempts also increased the incidence of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes (RR=1.29; 95% CI: 1.10-1.52).
Women for whom ECV is attempted at or near term are at reduced risk of caesarean section, non-cephalic presentation at term, and failure to achieve vaginal cephalic birth. Compared with no ECV, attempted ECV was also associated with a slightly increased risk of a low Apgar score at 5 minutes. The evidence is limited by the scarcity of high-quality research and the presence of risks of bias.
臀位外倒转术(ECV)是指在足月或接近足月时通过手法将胎儿从臀位转为头位,以避免臀位分娩。本系统评价总结了在资源丰富地区足月或接近足月时进行ECV对妊娠结局影响的相关文献。
检索MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、MIDIRS和SweMED+数据库中截至2019年4月发表的相关文章,对发表日期无限制。纳入在北欧、西欧、中欧、美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰进行的比较≥36周时进行ECV(无论是否使用宫缩抑制剂)与不进行ECV效果的临床试验。
纳入9篇报告184704例臀位妊娠的文章。汇总数据显示,与不进行ECV相比,尝试ECV可降低阴道头位分娩失败率(风险比,RR=0.56;95%可信区间:0.45-0.71)、剖宫产率(RR=0.57;95%可信区间:0.50-0.64)以及出生时非头位率(RR=0.45;95%可信区间:0.29-0.68)。尝试ECV还会增加5分钟时阿氏评分<7分的发生率(RR=1.29;95%可信区间:1.10-1.52)。
在足月或接近足月时尝试进行ECV的女性剖宫产、足月非头位分娩以及阴道头位分娩失败的风险降低。与不进行ECV相比,尝试ECV还与5分钟时阿氏评分较低的风险略有增加相关。证据受到高质量研究稀缺以及存在偏倚风险的限制。