Hua Njoo Khing, Van der Does Emiel
Department of Family Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3021 HR RotterdamThe Netherlands.
Pain. 1994 Sep;58(3):317-323. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90125-2.
The presence of a trigger point is essential to the myofascial pain syndrome. This study centres on identifying clearer criteria for the presence of trigger points in the quadratus lumborum and gluteus medius muscle by investigating the occurrence and inter-rater reliability of trigger point symptoms. Using the symptoms and signs as described by Simons' 1990 definition and two other former sets of criteria, 61 non-specific low back pain patients and 63 controls were examined in general practice by 5 observers, working in pairs. From the two major criteria of Simons' 1990 definition only 'localized tenderness' has good discriminative ability and inter-rater reliability (kappa > 0.5). This study does not find proof for the clinical usefulness of 'referred pain', which has neither of these two abilities. The criteria 'jump sign' and 'recognition', on the condition that localized tenderness is present, also have good discriminative ability and inter-rater reliability. Trigger points defined by the criteria found eligible in this study allow significant distinction between non-specific low back pain patients and controls. This is not the case with trigger points defined by Simons' 1990 criteria. Concerning reliability there is also a significant difference between the two different criteria sets. This study suggests that the clinical usefulness of trigger points is increased when localized tenderness and the presence of either jump sign or patient's recognition of his pain complaint are used as criteria for the presence of trigger points in the M. quadratus lumborum and the M. gluteus medius.
触发点的存在对于肌筋膜疼痛综合征至关重要。本研究的核心是通过调查触发点症状的发生率和评分者间信度,确定更明确的腰方肌和臀中肌触发点存在标准。根据西蒙斯1990年定义及另外两组先前的标准所描述的症状和体征,5名观察者两两合作,在全科医疗中对61名非特异性下背痛患者和63名对照者进行了检查。西蒙斯1990年定义的两个主要标准中,只有“局部压痛”具有良好的鉴别能力和评分者间信度(kappa>0.5)。本研究未找到“牵涉痛”临床有用性的证据,它不具备这两种能力。“跳跃征”和“识别征”这两个标准,在存在局部压痛的情况下,也具有良好的鉴别能力和评分者间信度。本研究中符合条件的标准所定义的触发点,能显著区分非特异性下背痛患者和对照者。西蒙斯1990年标准所定义的触发点则不然。在信度方面,这两组不同标准之间也存在显著差异。本研究表明,当将局部压痛以及跳跃征或患者对其疼痛主诉的识别作为腰方肌和臀中肌触发点存在的标准时,触发点的临床有用性会增加。