Alekseyev Kirill, Iskander Peter, De Santo Patrick
Pain Management and Rehabilitation, Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020 May 11;2(3):100058. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100058. eCollection 2020 Sep.
To monitor and treat pain effectively in stroke patients in an inpatient rehabilitation facility using an efficient Pain Assessment Survey.
The study was conducted as a 2-part project. Part 1 was a preintervention study conducted to assess the prevalence of pain in poststroke patients using a Pain Assessment Survey. Factors such as central and peripheral mechanisms, psychological factors, and autonomic input were used to study the surveyed population. Other potential risk factors, such as age and sex, were also incorporated into statistical gathering. The correlation between the presence of pain and poststroke patients was assessed, and an enhanced pain assessment was created and implemented in the admission process of poststroke patients. This helped comprise part of the second portion of the study, the postintervention study.
Participants were chosen from an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Each part of the project was conducted over a 6-month period.
Patients (N=184) were randomly selected. Eighty-two patients were included in the preintervention survey, and 102 patients were included in the postintervention survey. Those who had pain prior to stroke that remained unchanged or if the pain was secondary to another diagnosis were excluded from the study.
Patients with complaints of poststroke pain (PSP) were intervened immediately upon admission using a team approach. This included all personnel involved in the patient's care to resolve pain before discharge. Different types of medications and non-medical modalities were used for pain control.
The prevalence of PSP in poststroke patients.
The preintervention survey revealed a pain prevalence of 31.7%, whereas the postintervention study showed a prevalence of 11.8% in poststroke patients on admission. The odds that a poststroke patient would be discharged without pain and with a proper pain assessment and management was 96.2, with a statistically significant value of .0015.
The team approach to pain management resulted in all patients being successfully treated and discharged pain free. This further demonstrates the importance of using both a pain assessment survey and team approach to assess PSP in poststroke patients.
在住院康复机构中,使用高效的疼痛评估调查问卷对中风患者的疼痛进行有效监测和治疗。
该研究作为一个两部分的项目进行。第一部分是一项干预前研究,旨在使用疼痛评估调查问卷评估中风后患者的疼痛患病率。采用中枢和外周机制、心理因素以及自主神经输入等因素对被调查人群进行研究。其他潜在风险因素,如年龄和性别,也被纳入统计收集范围。评估了疼痛的存在与中风后患者之间的相关性,并在中风后患者的入院过程中创建并实施了强化疼痛评估。这有助于构成研究的第二部分,即干预后研究的一部分。
参与者选自一家住院康复机构。项目的每个部分持续6个月。
随机选择患者(N = 184)。82名患者被纳入干预前调查,102名患者被纳入干预后调查。中风前就存在且未改变的疼痛患者或疼痛继发于另一种诊断的患者被排除在研究之外。
有中风后疼痛(PSP)主诉的患者在入院时立即采用团队方法进行干预。这包括所有参与患者护理的人员,以便在出院前解决疼痛问题。使用不同类型的药物和非药物方法进行疼痛控制。
中风后患者中PSP的患病率。
干预前调查显示疼痛患病率为31.7%,而干预后研究显示中风后患者入院时的患病率为11.8%。中风后患者在进行适当的疼痛评估和管理后无痛出院的几率为96.2,统计学显著性值为0.0015。
团队疼痛管理方法使所有患者都得到了成功治疗且无痛出院。这进一步证明了使用疼痛评估调查问卷和团队方法来评估中风后患者PSP的重要性。