Laverse Etienne, Guo Tong, Zimmerman Karl, Foiani Martha S, Velani Bharat, Morrow Philip, Adejuwon Ademola, Bamford Richard, Underwood Natasha, George Jonathan, Brooke Daniel, O'Brien Karen, Cross Matthew J, Kemp Simon P T, Heslegrave Amanda J, Hardy John, Sharp David J, Zetterberg Henrik, Morris Huw R
Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, UK.
Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Brain Commun. 2020 Sep 7;2(2):fcaa137. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa137. eCollection 2020.
Mild traumatic brain injury is a relatively common event in contact sports and there is increasing interest in the long-term neurocognitive effects. The diagnosis largely relies on symptom reporting and there is a need for objective tools to aid diagnosis and prognosis. There are recent reports that blood biomarkers could potentially help triage patients with suspected injury and normal CT findings. We have measured plasma concentrations of glial and neuronal proteins and explored their potential in the assessment of mild traumatic brain injury in contact sport. We recruited a prospective cohort of active male rugby players, who had pre-season baseline plasma sampling. From this prospective cohort, we recruited 25 players diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury. We sampled post-match rugby players without head injuries as post-match controls. We measured plasma neurofilament light chain, tau and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels using ultrasensitive single molecule array technology. The data were analysed at the group and individual player level. Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein concentration was significantly increased 1-h post-injury in mild traumatic brain injury cases compared to the non-injured group ( = 0.017). Pairwise comparison also showed that glial fibrillary acidic protein levels were higher in players after a head injury in comparison to their pre-season levels at both 1-h and 3- to 10-day post-injury time points ( = 0.039 and 0.040, respectively). There was also an increase in neurofilament light chain concentration in brain injury cases compared to the pre-season levels within the same individual at both time points ( = 0.023 and 0.002, respectively). Tau was elevated in both the non-injured control group and the 1-h post-injury group compared to pre-season levels ( = 0.007 and 0.015, respectively). Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light chain can separate head injury cases from control players. The highest diagnostic power was detected when biomarkers were combined in differentiating 1-h post-match control players from 1-h post-head injury players (area under curve 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.00, < 0.0002). The brain astrocytic marker glial fibrillary acidic protein is elevated in blood 1 h after mild traumatic brain injury and in combination with neurofilament light chain displayed the potential as a reliable biomarker for brain injury evaluation. Plasma total tau is elevated following competitive rugby with and without a head injury, perhaps related to peripheral nerve trauma and therefore total tau does not appear to be suitable as a blood biomarker.
轻度创伤性脑损伤在接触性运动中是相对常见的事件,人们对其长期神经认知影响的兴趣与日俱增。诊断很大程度上依赖于症状报告,因此需要客观工具来辅助诊断和预测预后。最近有报道称,血液生物标志物可能有助于对疑似受伤且CT结果正常的患者进行分类。我们测量了血浆中胶质细胞和神经元蛋白的浓度,并探讨了它们在评估接触性运动中轻度创伤性脑损伤方面的潜力。我们招募了一组前瞻性队列的现役男性橄榄球运动员,他们在赛季前进行了基线血浆采样。从这个前瞻性队列中,我们招募了25名被诊断为轻度创伤性脑损伤的运动员。我们对无头部损伤的赛后橄榄球运动员进行采样作为赛后对照组。我们使用超灵敏单分子阵列技术测量了血浆神经丝轻链、tau蛋白和胶质纤维酸性蛋白水平。数据在组和个体运动员层面进行了分析。与未受伤组相比,轻度创伤性脑损伤病例在受伤后1小时血浆胶质纤维酸性蛋白浓度显著升高(=0.017)。两两比较还显示,在受伤后1小时和3至10天的时间点,头部受伤运动员的胶质纤维酸性蛋白水平高于其赛季前水平(分别为=0.039和0.040)。与同一受试者的赛季前水平相比,脑损伤病例在两个时间点的神经丝轻链浓度也有所增加(分别为=0.023和0.002)。与赛季前水平相比,未受伤对照组和受伤后1小时组的tau蛋白均升高(分别为=0.007和0.015)。此外,受试者工作特征分析表明,胶质纤维酸性蛋白和神经丝轻链可以将头部受伤病例与对照运动员区分开来。当生物标志物联合用于区分赛后1小时的对照运动员和头部受伤后1小时的运动员时,检测到最高的诊断能力(曲线下面积为0.90,95%置信区间为0.79-1.00,<0.0002)。脑星形胶质细胞标志物胶质纤维酸性蛋白在轻度创伤性脑损伤后1小时血液中升高,与神经丝轻链联合显示出作为脑损伤评估可靠生物标志物的潜力。在有或无头部损伤的竞争性橄榄球比赛后,血浆总tau蛋白都会升高,这可能与周围神经损伤有关,因此总tau蛋白似乎不适合作为血液生物标志物。