ANSES, Nancy Laboratory for Rabies and Wildlife-WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Management in Zoonoses Control; OIE Reference Laboratory for Rabies; European Union Reference Laboratory for Rabies; European Union Reference Laboratory for Rabies Serology-Bâtiment H, Technopôle Agricole et Vétérinaire, Malzéville, France.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Feb 5;15(2):e0009111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009111. eCollection 2021 Feb.
Rabies diagnosis proficiency tests on animal specimens using four techniques (FAT, RTCIT, conventional RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR) were organised over 10 years (2009-2019). Seventy-three laboratories, of which 59% were from Europe, took part. As the panels were prepared with experimentally-infected samples, the error rate of laboratories on positive and negative samples was accurately estimated. Based on fitted values produced by mixed modelling including the variable "laboratory" as a random variable to take into account the longitudinal design of our dataset, the technique that provided the most concordant results was conventional RT-PCR (99.3%; 95% CI 99.0-99.6), closely followed by FAT (99.1%; 95% CI 98.7-99.4), real-time RT-PCR (98.7%; 95% CI 98.1-99.3) and then RTCIT (96.8%; 95% CI 95.8-97.7). We also found that conventional RT-PCR provided a better diagnostic sensitivity level (99.3% ±4.4%) than FAT (98.7% ±1.6%), real-time RT-PCR (97.9% ±0.8%) and RTCIT (95.3% ±5.1%). Regarding diagnostic specificity, RTCIT was the most specific technique (96.4% ±3.9%) followed closely by FAT (95.6% ±3.8%), real-time RT-PCR (95.0% ±1.8%) and conventional RT-PCR (92.9% ±0.5%). Due to multiple testing of the samples with different techniques, the overall diagnostic conclusion was also evaluated, and found to reach an inter-laboratory concordance level of 99.3%. The concordance for diagnostic sensitivity was 99.6% ±2.0% and for diagnostic specificity, 98.0% ±8.5%. Molecular biology techniques were, however, found to be less specific than expected. The potential reasons for such findings are discussed herein. The regular organisation of performance tests has contributed to an increase in the performance of participating laboratories over time, demonstrating the benefits of such testing. Maintaining a high-quality rabies diagnosis capability on a global scale is key to achieving the goal of eliminating dog-mediated human rabies deaths. The regular organisation of exercises on each continent using selected local strains to be tested according to the local epidemiological situation is one factor that could help increase reliable diagnosis worldwide. Rabies diagnosis capabilities could indeed be enhanced by providing adequate and sustainable proficiency testing on a large scale and in the long term.
使用四种技术(FAT、RTCIT、常规 RT-PCR 和实时 RT-PCR)对动物标本进行的狂犬病诊断能力验证测试在过去 10 年(2009-2019 年)内组织开展。73 家实验室参加了测试,其中 59%来自欧洲。由于该检测板是用经实验感染的样本制备的,因此可以准确估计实验室对阳性和阴性样本的错误率。基于混合模型生成的拟合值,其中“实验室”作为一个随机变量纳入数据集中,从而考虑到了数据的纵向设计,最一致的结果是常规 RT-PCR(99.3%;95%CI 99.0-99.6),紧随其后的是 FAT(99.1%;95%CI 98.7-99.4)、实时 RT-PCR(98.7%;95%CI 98.1-99.3)和 RTCIT(96.8%;95%CI 95.8-97.7)。我们还发现,常规 RT-PCR 比 FAT(98.7%±1.6%)、实时 RT-PCR(97.9%±0.8%)和 RTCIT(95.3%±5.1%)提供了更好的诊断敏感性水平(99.3%±4.4%)。关于诊断特异性,RTCIT 是最特异的技术(96.4%±3.9%),紧随其后的是 FAT(95.6%±3.8%)、实时 RT-PCR(95.0%±1.8%)和常规 RT-PCR(92.9%±0.5%)。由于对不同技术的样本进行了多次检测,还评估了总体诊断结论,发现实验室之间的一致性达到 99.3%。诊断敏感性的一致性为 99.6%±2.0%,诊断特异性的一致性为 98.0%±8.5%。然而,分子生物学技术的特异性却低于预期。本文讨论了出现这种结果的潜在原因。定期组织性能测试有助于参与实验室随着时间的推移提高性能,证明了此类测试的益处。在全球范围内保持高质量的狂犬病诊断能力是实现消除犬介导的人类狂犬病死亡目标的关键。定期在每个大陆组织使用选定的当地菌株进行的检测,以根据当地的流行病学情况进行检测,这是有助于提高全球可靠诊断的一个因素。通过在长期内提供充足和可持续的大规模能力验证测试,可以提高狂犬病诊断能力。