• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚拟现实中的信息检索界面——一项聚焦当前技术代的范围综述。

Information retrieval interfaces in virtual reality-A scoping review focused on current generation technology.

机构信息

Department of Information Science, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246398. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0246398
PMID:33544731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7864671/
Abstract

The Information Retrieval user experience has remained largely unchanged since its inception for computers and mobile devices alike. However, recent developments in Virtual Reality hardware (pioneered by Oculus Rift in 2013) could introduce a new environment for Information Retrieval. This paper reports the results of a Scoping Literature Review (PRISMA-ScR) by rigorously examining the entire body of relevant literature with reproducible methods. The following research questions are answered: "What prototypes and concepts of Virtual Reality Information Retrieval systems with current generation hardware exist?", "How are user interaction and especially user input realised in these systems?", "What Retrieval features are used in these systems?", "How are search results displayed in these systems?" and "Can these VR IR systems compare to traditional (non-VR) IR systems?". After querying Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science, 1042 documents were reviewed in depth. Key features and attributes of the systems are summarised and discussed. Sketches of the user interfaces are included as well. The 30 documents that were relevant to the research questions include 16 distinct systems or theories. They discuss and utilise several user input technologies, ranging from controllers, voice input or hand tracking. Although conventional retrieval features are less common, systems enable retrieval of literature, 3D objects, images, books and texts and arrange them in a virtual space (e.g. as grids, arcs or maps). Finally, many of these systems were compared to conventional counterparts through user evaluation (n = 10). Most found user task times to be shorter or equal (n = 5, n = 3). In the seven papers that measured user performance (rate of correct solutions), three reported better performance (one equal). Notably, users always were more satisfied with the Virtual Reality systems compared to conventional ones. Possible limitations of these evaluations are demographic selection and the quality of baseline systems (control).

摘要

自计算机和移动设备问世以来,信息检索的用户体验基本保持不变。然而,虚拟现实硬件(由 2013 年的 Oculus Rift 开创)的最新发展可能会为信息检索带来新的环境。本文通过严格使用可重现的方法检查整个相关文献,报告了范围文献综述(PRISMA-ScR)的结果。回答了以下研究问题:“当前一代硬件的虚拟现实信息检索系统有哪些原型和概念?”、“这些系统如何实现用户交互,特别是用户输入?”、“这些系统使用了哪些检索功能?”、“这些系统如何显示搜索结果?”和“这些 VR IR 系统能与传统(非 VR)IR 系统相比吗?”。在查询 Google Scholar、Scopus 和 Web of Science 之后,深入审查了 1042 份文件。总结和讨论了系统的关键功能和属性,并包括了用户界面的草图。与研究问题相关的 30 份文件包括 16 个不同的系统或理论。它们讨论并利用了几种用户输入技术,从控制器、语音输入或手部跟踪器。虽然传统的检索功能不太常见,但系统能够检索文献、3D 对象、图像、书籍和文本,并将它们排列在虚拟空间中(例如,作为网格、弧形或地图)。最后,许多这样的系统通过用户评估(n=10)与传统的对应系统进行了比较。大多数发现用户完成任务的时间更短或相等(n=5,n=3)。在七篇测量用户绩效(正确解决方案的比率)的论文中,有三篇报告了更好的绩效(一篇相等)。值得注意的是,与传统系统相比,用户总是对虚拟现实系统更满意。这些评估的可能限制包括人口选择和基线系统(对照)的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee2/7864671/1b288edf7363/pone.0246398.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee2/7864671/1e69d7a274fb/pone.0246398.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee2/7864671/7521df022969/pone.0246398.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee2/7864671/76e82623f137/pone.0246398.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee2/7864671/1b288edf7363/pone.0246398.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee2/7864671/1e69d7a274fb/pone.0246398.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee2/7864671/7521df022969/pone.0246398.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee2/7864671/76e82623f137/pone.0246398.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ee2/7864671/1b288edf7363/pone.0246398.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Information retrieval interfaces in virtual reality-A scoping review focused on current generation technology.虚拟现实中的信息检索界面——一项聚焦当前技术代的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246398. eCollection 2021.
2
Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.针对胃肠内镜检查专业学员的虚拟现实模拟培训
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):CD008237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub3.
3
Augmented and virtual reality in spine surgery, current applications and future potentials.脊柱手术中的增强现实和虚拟现实:当前应用和未来潜力。
Spine J. 2021 Oct;21(10):1617-1625. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.018. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
Research Trends in Virtual Reality Music Concert Technology: A Systematic Literature Review.虚拟现实音乐会技术的研究趋势:一项系统的文献综述。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2024 May;30(5):2195-2205. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3372069. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
5
Longitudinal Coadaptation of Older Adults With Wearables and Voice-Activated Virtual Assistants: Scoping Review.老年人穿戴设备和语音激活虚拟助手的纵向协同适应:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 7;26:e57258. doi: 10.2196/57258.
6
A review on ergonomics evaluations of virtual reality.虚拟现实的人体工程学评估综述。
Work. 2023;74(3):831-841. doi: 10.3233/WOR-205232.
7
Understanding cancer patient cohorts in virtual reality environment for better clinical decisions: a usability study.在虚拟现实环境中理解癌症患者队列,以做出更好的临床决策:一项可用性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Dec 20;23(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02392-0.
8
Virtual and augmented reality in biomedical engineering.虚拟现实和增强现实在生物医学工程中的应用。
Biomed Eng Online. 2023 Jul 31;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12938-023-01138-3.
9
Comparing a virtual reality head-mounted display to on-screen three-dimensional visualization and two-dimensional computed tomography data for training in decision making in hepatic surgery: a randomized controlled study.虚拟现实头戴式显示器与屏幕三维可视化和二维计算机断层扫描数据在肝外科决策训练中的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2483-2496. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10615-8. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
10
Developing virtual and augmented reality applications for science, technology, engineering and math education.开发虚拟现实和增强现实应用,用于科学、技术、工程和数学教育。
Biotechniques. 2023 Jul;75(1):343-352. doi: 10.2144/btn-2023-0029. Epub 2023 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
2
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
A Critical Review of the Use of Virtual Reality in Construction Engineering Education and Training.
虚拟现实在建筑工程教育与培训中的应用之批判性回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 8;15(6):1204. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061204.
4
Application of virtual reality technology in clinical medicine.虚拟现实技术在临床医学中的应用。
Am J Transl Res. 2017 Sep 15;9(9):3867-3880. eCollection 2017.
5
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
6
Information retrieval: an overview of system characteristics.信息检索:系统特征概述
Int J Med Inform. 1997 Nov;47(1-2):5-26. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00094-4.