Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, La Ribera University Hospital, FISABIO, Crta. Corbera km 1, 46600 Valencia, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1429. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041429.
Improving nursing students' attitudes towards patient safety is a current and relevant topic. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention based on critical incident and root cause analysis (RCA) techniques regarding attitudes towards patient safety in nursing students. A quasi-experimental before and after study was developed between January 2018 and December 2019 in a sample of 100 nursing students at Universitat Jaume I (Spain). The intervention was developed in two phases. Phase I was at university, where students applied the RCA technique in a real case. Phase II took place during clinical practice. Students used critical incidents to identify a risk situation for the patients and applied RCA to detect its root causes. The measurement of attitudes was performed with the Attitudes to Patient Safety Questionnaire (APSQ-III). The global score of the questionnaire in the baseline measurement was 3.911 (±0.335), in the intermediate measurement it was 4.031 (±0.337) and in the final measurement it was 4.052 (±0.335), with significant differences ( = 0.03). However, intra-group differences were observed in the final measurement ( = 0.021). The teamwork dimension had the highest mean score on all three measures and the notification dimension had the lowest mean scores. An educational intervention combining critical incident and RCA techniques can improves nursing students' attitudes toward patient safety.
提高护理学生对患者安全的态度是当前的热门话题。本研究旨在评估基于关键事件和根本原因分析(RCA)技术的教育干预措施对护理学生对患者安全态度的有效性。在 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间,在西班牙海梅一世大学(Universitat Jaume I)的 100 名护理学生样本中开展了一项准实验性的前后研究。该干预措施分为两个阶段进行。第一阶段在大学进行,学生在真实案例中应用 RCA 技术。第二阶段在临床实习期间进行。学生使用关键事件来识别患者的风险情况,并应用 RCA 来发现其根本原因。使用患者安全态度问卷(APSQ-III)对态度进行测量。在基线测量中,问卷的总分是 3.911(±0.335),在中间测量中是 4.031(±0.337),在最终测量中是 4.052(±0.335),差异具有统计学意义( = 0.03)。然而,最终测量中观察到了组内差异( = 0.021)。在所有三个测量中,团队合作维度的平均得分最高,而通知维度的平均得分最低。结合关键事件和 RCA 技术的教育干预可以提高护理学生对患者安全的态度。