• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种基于实验室的 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 抗体免疫分析评估。

Evaluation of four laboratory-based SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody immunoassays.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Biology, Laboratory of Microbiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Clinical Biology, Laboratory of Microbiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 May;100(1):115313. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115313. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115313
PMID:33548855
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7816597/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performances of four SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody immunoassays.

METHODS

Following immunoassays were studied: Abbott's SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay, Diasorin's Liaison SARS-CoV-2 S2/S2 IgG assay, Euroimmun's Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA, and Roche's Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay. Specificity was retrospectively evaluated with 38 samples from 2019. Sensitivity samples (n = 147) were taken from SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR-positive patients who developed COVID-19 symptoms ten days earlier.

RESULTS

Mean specificity was 96.6%. Mean sensitivity was 62.7% from ten days after onset of symptoms, 84.4% from 15 days after onset of symptoms, and 87.5% from 20 days after onset of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Specificity was high, while Abbott and Roche were 100% specific. Sensitivity increased over time, with Abbott and Roche having the highest sensitivity at all time points with ≥90% from 20 days after symptoms' onset. These findings may assist in selecting SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody immunoassays for additional diagnostics, epidemiological research, and vaccine development.

摘要

目的

评估四种 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 抗体免疫测定的诊断性能。

方法

研究了以下免疫测定:雅培 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 测定、DiaSorin Liaison SARS-CoV-2 S2/S2 IgG 测定、欧蒙 Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA 以及罗氏 Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 测定。使用 2019 年的 38 份样本对特异性进行了回顾性评估。敏感性样本(n=147)取自 COVID-19 症状出现 10 天前 SARS-CoV-2 实时 PCR 阳性的患者。

结果

平均特异性为 96.6%。从症状出现后 10 天开始,平均敏感性为 62.7%,从症状出现后 15 天开始为 84.4%,从症状出现后 20 天开始为 87.5%。

结论

特异性较高,雅培和罗氏的特异性均为 100%。敏感性随时间推移而增加,雅培和罗氏在所有时间点的敏感性最高,从症状出现后 20 天开始均≥90%。这些发现可能有助于选择 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 抗体免疫测定以进行额外的诊断、流行病学研究和疫苗开发。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of four laboratory-based SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody immunoassays.四种基于实验室的 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 抗体免疫分析评估。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 May;100(1):115313. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115313. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Performance evaluation of three automated quantitative immunoassays and their correlation with a surrogate virus neutralization test in coronavirus disease 19 patients and pre-pandemic controls.三种自动化定量免疫分析方法的性能评估及其与新型冠状病毒病患者和大流行前对照者替代病毒中和试验的相关性。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Sep;35(9):e23921. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23921. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
3
Comparison of 16 Serological SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in 16 Clinical Laboratories.16家临床实验室中16种血清学新冠病毒免疫分析方法的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02596-20.
4
Inference of SARS-CoV-2 spike-binding neutralizing antibody titers in sera from hospitalized COVID-19 patients by using commercial enzyme and chemiluminescent immunoassays.使用商业酶联免疫吸附试验和化学发光免疫分析方法推断住院 COVID-19 患者血清中 SARS-CoV-2 刺突结合中和抗体效价。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;40(3):485-494. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04128-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 through the evaluation of three immunoassays: Two automated immunoassays (Euroimmun and Abbott) and one rapid lateral flow immunoassay (NG Biotech).评估三种免疫测定法(Euroimmun 和 Abbott 的两种自动化免疫测定法以及 NG Biotech 的一种快速侧向流动免疫测定法)用于诊断 COVID-19 的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104511. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104511. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
6
Comparison of the Clinical Performances of the Abbott Alinity IgG, Abbott Architect IgM, and Roche Elecsys Total SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays.雅培 Alinity IgG、雅培 Architect IgM 和罗氏 Elecsys 总 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测试剂的临床性能比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Dec 17;59(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02104-20.
7
Performance characteristics of five immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2: a head-to-head benchmark comparison.五种 SARS-CoV-2 免疫测定法的性能特征:头对头基准比较。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;20(12):1390-1400. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30634-4. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
8
Evaluation of Three Quantitative Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Immunoassays.三种定量抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体免疫分析方法的评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0137621. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01376-21.
9
Two SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassays comparison and time-course profile of antibodies response.两种 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 免疫分析比较及抗体反应的时间进程。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;99(4):115297. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115297. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
10
Clinical evaluation of the antibody response in patients with COVID-19 using automated high-throughput immunoassays.使用自动化高通量免疫分析评估 COVID-19 患者的抗体反应。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;100(3):115370. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115370. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
An Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy for Seven Different SARS-CoV-2 Serological Assays: A Meta-Analysis and Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.七种不同的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2血清学检测诊断准确性的间接比较:诊断试验准确性的荟萃分析和调整后的间接比较
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2025 Sep;19(9):e70155. doi: 10.1111/irv.70155.
2
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in healthcare workers in Shiga Prefecture, Japan.日本滋贺县医护人员接种 COVID-19 疫苗的效果。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 21;12(1):17621. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22682-3.
3
Recent advances in point of care testing for COVID-19 detection.即时检测在 COVID-19 检测中的最新进展。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2022 Sep;153:113538. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113538. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
4
Serology suggests adequate safety measures to protect healthcare workers from COVID-19 in Shiga Prefecture, Japan.血清学表明,在日本滋贺县采取充分的安全措施可保护医护人员免受 COVID-19 感染。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0270334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270334. eCollection 2022.
5
Sero-Surveillance to Monitor the Trend of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Transmission in India: Study Protocol for a Multi Site, Community Based Longitudinal Cohort Study.血清监测以监测印度 SARS-CoV-2 感染传播趋势:一项多地点、社区为基础的纵向队列研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;10:810353. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.810353. eCollection 2022.
6
A Rapid Detection of COVID-19 Viral RNA in Human Saliva Using Electrical Double Layer-Gated Field-Effect Transistor-Based Biosensors.使用基于双电层门控场效应晶体管的生物传感器快速检测人唾液中的新冠病毒RNA
Adv Mater Technol. 2022 Jan;7(1):2100842. doi: 10.1002/admt.202100842. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
7
SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence survey among health care providers in a Belgian public multiple-site hospital.比利时一家公立多地点医院医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率调查。
Epidemiol Infect. 2021 Aug 10;149:e172. doi: 10.1017/S0950268821001497.
8
Performance evaluation of three automated quantitative immunoassays and their correlation with a surrogate virus neutralization test in coronavirus disease 19 patients and pre-pandemic controls.三种自动化定量免疫分析方法的性能评估及其与新型冠状病毒病患者和大流行前对照者替代病毒中和试验的相关性。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Sep;35(9):e23921. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23921. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
9
Assay dependence of long-term kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.SARS-CoV-2 抗体长期动力学的分析依赖性。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;100(4):115403. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115403. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Immunological considerations for COVID-19 vaccine strategies.针对 COVID-19 疫苗策略的免疫学考虑。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Oct;20(10):615-632. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00434-6. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
2
Rapid Decay of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Persons with Mild Covid-19.轻度新冠肺炎患者体内抗SARS-CoV-2抗体的快速衰减
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 10;383(11):1085-1087. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2025179. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for covid-19: systematic review and meta-analysis.血清学检测在 COVID-19 诊断中的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 1;370:m2516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2516.
4
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.用于识别当前和既往感染新型冠状病毒2的抗体检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6(6):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.
5
Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections.无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的临床和免疫学评估。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1200-1204. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0965-6. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies: an Italian experience.一种自动化化学发光免疫分析检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG 抗体的诊断准确性:意大利经验。
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1671-1675. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25932. Epub 2020 May 10.
7
Developing antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2.研发针对新型冠状病毒的抗体检测方法。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 4;395(10230):1101-1102. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30788-1.
8
Profiling Early Humoral Response to Diagnose Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).分析早期体液免疫反应以诊断新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):778-785. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa310.